When will it pop

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
The American dollar is about to lose at least 15% of its value. I do see inflation at all
time highs in the months ahead. In fact before this month is over we will see the signs of a market down turn even more severe than the last one. S&P will drop as
well as as the stock market. I believe by the end of summer we will see the market
gains of the past year wiped out. Oh and for those with bonds, not speculating in
bonds watch out this time they will take a hit. We are in for one rough ride in the
coming months, and it will last a long time this time. RRSPs, Mutual Funds and
speculation stock will be trampled in one big basket. Guess we will see who's right
by fall in late September.
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
I don’t’ know about the West (and I agree that house prices are ridiculously high in Vancouver, but then they have always been that way).

Here in Ontario, there is no housing bubble. Sure house prices are on the increase, but no more than usual.

Average home prices, 50-year price trend, Toronto real estate

Now in 1989, that was a real housing bubble, the prices came crashing down in subsequent years. Nothing like that is happening today.

I am not really familiar with what is happening in the West, I do know that house prices have always been high in places like Vancouver, Calgary etc. But at least in Ontario, there is no housing bubble.

My son is looking for a condo in London (he starts his residency in July, and he figures it is better to buy a small condo than pay rent for four or five years). So we know there is no bubble in London. There is no bubble where I live.

So at least Ontario is safe, I don’t know about the West.

So let me get this straight.
You quote a realtor.
A realtor.
You instantly loose the debate.
And a nice bail job on the rest of Canada, suddenly now you only know about Ontario.
I can link to Euro financial analysts, international financial analysts, American financial analysts, the TD bank, the RBC bank, the ex governor of the bank of Canada.
And so on.

Toronto is by definition heavily into bubble territory.
All of Canada is not, at least by my way of thinking.
London is certainly not in a bubble situation.
So your son, again in my opinion, is buying into a desirable (financially) location.
Toronto and Ottawa are the two problems in Ontario.
Those two place have a huge downside risk.
The rest of Ontario is fine.

Trex
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
Be careful of the bond market? That is one thing you don’t have to worry about, unless you are speculating in bonds. And if you are speculating, you deserve all you get.

But if you have bought bonds for income, why would bonds going down affect you? Unlike stocks, the face value of a bond is guaranteed provided you hold the bond to maturity.

So suppose you have a bond which pays 5%, set to mature in 10 years. You are collecting interest every year. Now interest rates go up, the bond slips form 100 $ to 80$. Why should you care about that? You still keep getting your 5%. Hold the bond for 10 years and you are guaranteed to get your 100 $ back.

So if you hold bonds for interest income it generates, you have nothing to worry about. If you hold bonds to make a quick buck (for capital gains), you may well get burned, and you would deserve it.

SJP
Bonds loose value as interest rates rise.
And corporate bonds are in no way guaranteed.
Short terms are no problem as they are readily redeemable with a minimal downside.
Long term bonds lock you in over the life of the bond issue.
If interest rates are more likely than not to rise (which they are) long bonds suck.

Trex
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
Vancouver has always been a "don't buy, it's too high" zone. Victoria is much the same. That doesn't put the whole province over the edge. Housing isn't cheap and if you are not already in the market, getting there has become more difficult. I don't remember where but somewhere on these forums there is a thread that speaks about the new rules that are being set by the federal governement. Zero down isn't going to happen anymore. I'm not so sure it ever did. My niece and her husband bought in downtown Vancouver and they had to have 10% down. It was their second purchase but they did not do the sell and buy thing. There was a few years in between. My son bought here in town and he didn't have a dime for a downpayment. The guy he was buying from just worked it out so that his purchase included a downpayment - meaning on paper he had the money. I don't know how they are supposed to do it but first time buyers are going to have to show that they can pay the payments for a year mtg. even if they don't go with a fixed rate. Newspaper people trash talk anyone and anything. I think the best thing for anyone to do is talk to their banker before they make any quick decisions and before they have major disappointments.

Van Isle,
Your right zero down is not going to happen any more.
And neither I suspect are the 40 year terms.
Flaherty is slowly but surely tightening the mortgage requirements in order to gently ease out of the Canadian real estate bubble.
The problem is it's very difficult to "ease" out of a bubble, usually they pop.
CMHC is now on the hook for billions of dollars in shaky mortgages which will go underwater fairly rapidly if interest rates rise.

And no offence but I really don't see your logic in your statement about high prices in Victoria.
Saying "its always been high" is flawed logic.
Thats like saying "Victoria has always been in a real estate bubble so it's not really in a real estate bubble".

In any case it's just not true.
Victoria and Vancouver have NOT always been overpriced.
I was born in Victoria.
My parents purchased and sold several properties in Victoria.
I still have family on the peninsula.
The problem developed in the 90's.

I have also lived in Vancouver, my mother still lives in Vancouver.
I know exactly what properties sold for over the years in Vancouver.

Vancouver and Victoria are in a serious real estate bubbles.
It's unsustainable.
Its a huge downside risk to new first time home buyers.
And thats why I have a problem with it.
I dont care about high income earners or people with money.
And frankly I am not worried about you or me.
We are older and already have skin in the game.
My problem is the young families who think its normal to take on a huge downside risk in Canadian real estate.
It's not normal.

Van Isle or anyone else who is interested in Victoria real estate prices I strongly urge you to go to the Victoria Real Estate Blog.
Here:HouseHuntVictoria
Read the replies to the various starters over the last year.
The replies come from local Victoria realtors, lawyers,bankers, mortgage brokers, flippers and investors, construction company owners, city planners and various local residents.
I know because I follow the blog.
The reason why I follow the blog is because thats where I am from and I know some of the people.
Amongst the replies you will find links to historical stats galore, spreadsheets, formulae, bar graphs, histograms and so on and so forth on concerning everything anyone could possibly want to know about housing prices in Victoria.
You will, of course, also see people who say there is no bubble in Victoria( mainly realtors and mortgage brokers) as well as people who say it doesn't matter.

It does matter.
Its financially unhealthy.
It's bad for the economy.
And it makes young growing families absorb huge downside risk.

I would urge young first time buyers to avoid buying property in the bubble cities of Victoria, Vancouver and Toronto.
I would also urge extreme caution in buying into the overpriced cities of Abbotsford, Kelowna, Edmonton, Calgary and Ottawa.
There is very little upside and huge downside risk involved.
If you go into a negative equity situation you CANNOT walk away like the Americans do.
You will have to pay all the losses back to the bank or declare bankruptcy.

Be careful and get good advice before buying into bubble markets.

Trex
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
SJP
Bonds loose value as interest rates rise.
And corporate bonds are in no way guaranteed.
Short terms are no problem as they are readily redeemable with a minimal downside.
Long term bonds lock you in over the life of the bond issue.
If interest rates are more likely than not to rise (which they are) long bonds suck.

Trex

Bonds never lose the face value. Their market value may drop as interest rates rise, but if you keep the bond to maturity, you are guaranteed the face value. So if you bought the bond for interest income, you don’t have to worry about bond value dropping.

And what do you mean corporate bonds are not guaranteed? Of course they are guaranteed by the corporation. If you buy a Bell bond with a face value of 100$, Bell guarantees to pay you 100 $ at the maturity (or earlier, if Bell recalls the bond earlier). The only way you won’t get your 100 $ is if Bell goes belly up.

If you buy corporate bonds from big corporation such as Bell, any of the banks etc., they are quite safe. If you buy junk bonds, that is a different story. But provided you hold government bonds or corporate bonds issued by big reputable corporations, they are quite safe.

As to long bonds, again it depends upon why you bought them. If you bought them for the interest income, why would you care if they drop in value? How is that going to hurt you? It will hurt you only if you sell. Hold it to maturity and you are OK.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
So let me get this straight.
You quote a realtor.
A realtor.
You instantly loose the debate.
And a nice bail job on the rest of Canada, suddenly now you only know about Ontario.
I can link to Euro financial analysts, international financial analysts, American financial analysts, the TD bank, the RBC bank, the ex governor of the bank of Canada.
And so on.

Toronto is by definition heavily into bubble territory.
All of Canada is not, at least by my way of thinking.
London is certainly not in a bubble situation.
So your son, again in my opinion, is buying into a desirable (financially) location.
Toronto and Ottawa are the two problems in Ontario.
Those two place have a huge downside risk.
The rest of Ontario is fine.

Trex

What is wrong with quoting a real estate agent? I haven’t quoted her opinions; I only refer to the statistics. She has put up the graph showing how prices have varied for the past 50 years. Do you dispute her figures? Are you saying that Toronto house prices are skyrocketing? If so, please put up a link to support your contention.

As to bailing out on rest of Canada, I don’t see any bubble in Ontario, so I assumed the situation would be the same all over Canada.

But as to Toronto, I strongly disagree with you there, unless you can substantiate your opinion (that Toronto has a bubble) by solid figures. Look at the bubble in 1989 shown on the graph which I put up. Prices skyrocketed in 1989 and then crashed. There has been no such skyrocketing in Toronto, where is the bubble?

As to your claim that TD bank, RBC etc. claiming that there is a bubble in Toronto, I look at the numbers and form my own opinion. Toronto house prices have risen only modestly in the past year (by 4%), and I don’t see a bubble.

Rather than telling me that this agency or that agency claims that there is a bubble, put up some concrete figures, how fast do you think house prices are increasing in Toronto. If you don’t agree with the figures put up by the real estate agent, what are the real figures, according to you? How fast are the house prices increasing in Toronto, according to you?
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
The American dollar is about to lose at least 15% of its value. I do see inflation at all
time highs in the months ahead. In fact before this month is over we will see the signs of a market down turn even more severe than the last one. S&P will drop as
well as as the stock market. I believe by the end of summer we will see the market
gains of the past year wiped out. Oh and for those with bonds, not speculating in
bonds watch out this time they will take a hit. We are in for one rough ride in the
coming months, and it will last a long time this time. RRSPs, Mutual Funds and
speculation stock will be trampled in one big basket. Guess we will see who's right
by fall in late September.

I agree with you to some extent. I think there will be a pull back in the stock market for a couple of reasons. One is that we have had a fantastic run up in stocks (from 7600 to 12000), now there will inevitably be some profit taking and stock market will fall.

Another reason is that the normal pattern is for the stock to fall now. In a normal year, first quarter is good for stocks. And we have had a good quarter so far, the stocks are up this quarter. TSE is up by a few hundred point since December.

Second and third quarters are usually bad for stocks. In July and August summer doldrums set in, September is usually the worst month for stocks. We are now approaching the time when normally stock market drops.

The normal pattern is that stock turn around in October, that is when the bear is slain. November and December are usually good months for stocks.

So I wouldn’t be surprised to se 10 to 15 % drop in stock market, which would mean 1200 to 1800 point drop in TSA. TSE may well drop to 10,000 region before the correction is over.

However, I do expect the correction to be over and a strong run up in November and December. Of course, it is a mug’s game to predict what the stock market will do in the short run. However my hunch is that we will finish the year with TSE above 12,000.

This is a dramatically different forecast from yours. We will see who is right in December. However, in the short term, we both agree, stocks are headed downwards. In my opinion, that would be a good buying opportunity.

Anyway, I am not heading for the hills.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
This is no ordinary correction I believe shortly the entire system will collapse.
Even China is now under pressure. Greece is in major trouble, and Iceland
just told the bankers to go to hell. The United States is about to default in
the near future. Whiskey and Gunpowder is a site that pretty much says it
for this one. No need to protest, the system will collapse on it own.
We are facing a major loss in the market. The bond market warnings are
out there, and leveraged funds are about to take us on a roller coaster ride
we have never seen before. Yes the dollar will drop in the US, but Europe is
about to wave goodbye to prosperity. As the world slides into debt, inflation
and unemployment, we will not escape either.
This is not about market correction its about major recession and debt, capped
off by the possibility of a depression all before the end of this year.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
"I agree with you to some extent. I think there will be a pull back in the stock market for a couple of reasons. One is that we have had a fantastic run up in stocks (from 7600 to 12000), now there will inevitably be some profit taking and stock market will fall.

Another reason is that the normal pattern is for the stock to fall now. In a normal year, first quarter is good for stocks. And we have had a good quarter so far, the stocks are up this quarter. TSE is up by a few hundred point since December."

It's going to collapse for sure- but this hasn't been a particularly long bull market, average bulls is about 3 years, at any rate I don't think much will happen before the T.S.X breaks through it's previous mark of just under 15,000. I don't know how many investors took advantage of the last crash and bought in- most out of stupidity unload when they should be buying up stuff cheap. I bought some (mutual funds) wish I'd borrowed more and bought more. A smart guy right now will start slowly converting equities to fixed income. Next major correction will probably be in 2011 at the earliest.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
It's going to collapse for sure- but this hasn't been a particularly long bull market, average bulls is about 3 years, at any rate I don't think much will happen before the T.S.X breaks through it's previous mark of just under 15,000. I don't know how many investors took advantage of the last crash and bought in- most out of stupidity unload when they should be buying up stuff cheap. I bought some (mutual funds) wish I'd borrowed more and bought more. A smart guy right now will start slowly converting equities to fixed income. Next major correction will probably be in 2011 at the earliest.


That would be pretty much my assessment, except I don’t know about the collapse. I think we are in for a 10 to 15% correction some time in the near future, but I also think the market will come out stronger as a result of that.

As to what happens next year, that is anybody’s guess. But I am not putting any more money in the market. While I put in a substantial amount of money in the market in 2008 (those were the days, BMO paying 10% dividend, CIBC paying 9%), I am sitting on the sidelines to see what the market does. If it comes down to 11000, I may put some money into it.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
Trex:
I didn't pay much attention to the housing market in Victoria until the 90's when we moved to the Island. In the beginning of "Island life", Victoria seems like THE place to live. However, after living here now for several years (on the Island, not just Nanaimo), Victoria is one of the last places I would live. I actually don't like it there at all. I know many love it's old city charm as they call it. To me it's just grubby. I know it has some fantastic places to go and all cities have their grubby areas. Victoria is just not my cup of tea. It has always been expensive to our way of thinking and costs considerably more than here. Nanaimo is not cheap either though. Places like Tofino are really expensive. We lived in Surrey in the mid 70's and I recall going to look at a house that had a price tag of $73,000.00. Just an average house. We didn't even consider inquiring at a bank to see if we could buy it. Silly. Wish we had.
I was at the bank the other day talking to the branch manager. She said this is the time to sell a house. Lots of houses selling she says and she also says the market is great. What can I say!
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Trex:
I didn't pay much attention to the housing market in Victoria until the 90's when we moved to the Island. In the beginning of "Island life", Victoria seems like THE place to live. However, after living here now for several years (on the Island, not just Nanaimo), Victoria is one of the last places I would live. I actually don't like it there at all. I know many love it's old city charm as they call it. To me it's just grubby. I know it has some fantastic places to go and all cities have their grubby areas. Victoria is just not my cup of tea. It has always been expensive to our way of thinking and costs considerably more than here. Nanaimo is not cheap either though. Places like Tofino are really expensive. We lived in Surrey in the mid 70's and I recall going to look at a house that had a price tag of $73,000.00. Just an average house. We didn't even consider inquiring at a bank to see if we could buy it. Silly. Wish we had.
I was at the bank the other day talking to the branch manager. She said this is the time to sell a house. Lots of houses selling she says and she also says the market is great. What can I say!

We took Alaska cruise three years ago, starting from Vancouver. We stayed in Vancouver for three days. From the airport to the hotel I got into the conversation with the taxi driver. He told me that to get any kind of house in Vancouver one was talking of 500,000 $.

So sky high house prices in Vancouver is nothing new.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
We took Alaska cruise three years ago, starting from Vancouver. We stayed in Vancouver for three days. From the airport to the hotel I got into the conversation with the taxi driver. He told me that to get any kind of house in Vancouver one was talking of 500,000 $.

So sky high house prices in Vancouver is nothing new.
Well - maybe you and your wife should take a Vancouver Island vacation sometime. It's really quite nice here.
Years ago we were asked to transfer to Vancouver. It would have been a promotional move for my husband. We lived in Courtenay at the time. We said no because we had just built a house in Courtenay for one thing but more importantly, we knew we could not afford a house in Vancouver. I don't like Vancouver anyway. I don't like any big city in any province.
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
Bonds never lose the face value. Their market value may drop as interest rates rise, but if you keep the bond to maturity, you are guaranteed the face value. So if you bought the bond for interest income, you don’t have to worry about bond value dropping.

And what do you mean corporate bonds are not guaranteed? Of course they are guaranteed by the corporation. If you buy a Bell bond with a face value of 100$, Bell guarantees to pay you 100 $ at the maturity (or earlier, if Bell recalls the bond earlier). The only way you won’t get your 100 $ is if Bell goes belly up.

If you buy corporate bonds from big corporation such as Bell, any of the banks etc., they are quite safe. If you buy junk bonds, that is a different story. But provided you hold government bonds or corporate bonds issued by big reputable corporations, they are quite safe.

As to long bonds, again it depends upon why you bought them. If you bought them for the interest income, why would you care if they drop in value? How is that going to hurt you? It will hurt you only if you sell. Hold it to maturity and you are OK.

SJP for someone who posts about how successful his investments are and then posts advising other how to invest you really don't seem to know much about the bond market.

I freely admit I do not know much about it either, but then I don't make posts advising people to buy bonds.

So, because you seem to have no idea what I was talking about before here is a short primer on bonds.

Bonds always move inversely to interest rates.
That is the actual bond value itself not the rate of return.

An investment portfolio should contain between 20 and 35% bonds (on average).
This is to hedge against rising interest rates and to provide stability in choppy markets.
It takes quit a bit of money to actually hold physical bonds in an investment portfolio because the bonds always need to be laddered.
Laddering a bond portfolio is actually quite tricky and I, personally would not attempt it.
Remember the old Canada Savings Bond that grandma purchased for you on your 12th birthday?
That was then.
CSB's have virtually no place in a bond portfolio these days.
CSB's are returning 1% on one year and 1.8% on three years.
Banks like ING and Ally will give you 2% on a daily interest internet savings account and the first 100 thou is guaranteed by the Government of Canada.
So only an idiot would buy into CSB's right now.

SJB was asking me why long bonds are risky and saying that they should be held to maturity.
That tells me either SJP doesn't hold a bond portfolio or he has no clue how bonds as investments work.
A laddered and properly structured bond portfolio indeed will be selling and buying bonds before maturity.
There is far more money to be made in buying and selling bonds on the bonds underlying value than there is sitting around waiting for them to mature.
A proper bond portfolio would probably contain a few zero coupons or stripped bonds which provide no return at all.

Here is an example of making money on a bond. This is made simply to illustrate a point.
Back in 1980 Joe Blow buys a 100 dollar 50 year CSB (no such thing bye the way) at 20% interest.
Joe holds the thing to 2010. 30 years at 20% interest pays Joe $600 bucks and he still has his $100 in the original bond.
So Joe decides to sell it.
Well, obviously its going to cost more than a $100.
There is $500 on the table, so lets say Joe tries to flog it for $375.
That is an example of two things: selling a bond before maturity for a profit and number two making a bundle on a long bond purchased during times of high interest rates and dumping in times of low interest rates.
Remember I said earlier that bonds always move inversely to interest rates?
Well, purchasing a long bond in times of low interest rates and then having to sell it during times of high or rising rates would be the exact opposite of what Joe Blow pulled off and the value of your long bond would be crashed lower than whale $hit.
The Bank of Canada's set rate is now virtually zero, CSB's are paying under 2%.
Anyone but me think interest rates will be going up in the next 3 to 5 years, considering it's pretty much physically impossible to go lower?

So SJP, that is why I feel it would be stupid at this point in time to buy a long bond.
And as to the holding the long bond to maturity logic, that is flat dumb too.
If interest rates are climbing or going to climb and your money is locked for a long time at minimal return you are loosing money constantly sitting on the bond and not having it available for reinvestment at far higher returns.
Thats why the long bond value would be plunging in the first place.

On to corporate bonds.
In my original post I stated that corporate bonds were not guaranteed and SJP was wondering what I was talking about.
Only bank accounts of under 100 thou in Canadian charter banks and Canadian Savings Bonds and GIC's are guaranteed by the Canadian Government.
Corporate bonds you take your chances.
When a company defaults or hits the skids the banks get their money out first.
Next up on the carcass are the bondholders, then preferred share holders and finally common shareholders.
So SJP, thats why there can be quite a bit of risk in holding bonds.
And as to blue chips, you mean like Enron,Dodge,Lehman Bros,Delta Airlines, Bank of America and the like?

A good laddered bond portfolio will of course be holding a blend of high risk and low risk bonds.
If a higher risk company looks like it will go under you dump the bond at a loss.
If a higher risk company suddenly looks golden you can sell the bond for a profit or sit on it for higher returns at a lower risk rate.
In times of potentially increasing interest rates you should be shortening the maturity lengths on your bond portfolio.
And in times of high rates with a possibility of lower future rates you should be buying longer bonds.

Fact is, most folks cant afford to buy all these various investments.
And you need serious cash for bond brokers to get you the good deals on bond prices (and yes they do sell the exact same bond issue for different rates to different investors).
So they buy a bond holding mutual fund.
Which charges a fee to ladder the bonds and buy and sell bonds to tune the fund for maximum return (and tax leverage).
The fee is usually a killer in comparison to the fund returns and once again the little guy with only a few bucks to invest usually gets stiffed.

So there you have it SJP, bonds in a nutshell.
No longer do you buy them and stick them under the mattress.
Today you actually need to participate, or you need to hire someone to do it for you.

A few rules for would be investors.
Do not listen to SJP.
Do not listen to Trex, I freely admit I dont know much about bonds.
Do not get financial advice from internet boards.
Hire a good financial advisor or if you are into mutual funds try hard to get a well recommended broker who will refrain from churning your account and ease off on the hidden costs.

Trex
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
SJP for someone who posts about how successful his investments are and then posts advising other how to invest you really don't seem to know much about the bond market.

I freely admit I do not know much about it either, but then I don't make posts advising people to buy bonds.

So, because you seem to have no idea what I was talking about before here is a short primer on bonds.

Bonds always move inversely to interest rates.
That is the actual bond value itself not the rate of return.

An investment portfolio should contain between 20 and 35% bonds (on average).
This is to hedge against rising interest rates and to provide stability in choppy markets.
It takes quit a bit of money to actually hold physical bonds in an investment portfolio because the bonds always need to be laddered.
Laddering a bond portfolio is actually quite tricky and I, personally would not attempt it.
Remember the old Canada Savings Bond that grandma purchased for you on your 12th birthday?
That was then.
CSB's have virtually no place in a bond portfolio these days.
CSB's are returning 1% on one year and 1.8% on three years.
Banks like ING and Ally will give you 2% on a daily interest internet savings account and the first 100 thou is guaranteed by the Government of Canada.
So only an idiot would buy into CSB's right now.

SJB was asking me why long bonds are risky and saying that they should be held to maturity.
That tells me either SJP doesn't hold a bond portfolio or he has no clue how bonds as investments work.
A laddered and properly structured bond portfolio indeed will be selling and buying bonds before maturity.
There is far more money to be made in buying and selling bonds on the bonds underlying value than there is sitting around waiting for them to mature.
A proper bond portfolio would probably contain a few zero coupons or stripped bonds which provide no return at all.

Here is an example of making money on a bond. This is made simply to illustrate a point.
Back in 1980 Joe Blow buys a 100 dollar 50 year CSB (no such thing bye the way) at 20% interest.
Joe holds the thing to 2010. 30 years at 20% interest pays Joe $600 bucks and he still has his $100 in the original bond.
So Joe decides to sell it.
Well, obviously its going to cost more than a $100.
There is $500 on the table, so lets say Joe tries to flog it for $375.
That is an example of two things: selling a bond before maturity for a profit and number two making a bundle on a long bond purchased during times of high interest rates and dumping in times of low interest rates.
Remember I said earlier that bonds always move inversely to interest rates?
Well, purchasing a long bond in times of low interest rates and then having to sell it during times of high or rising rates would be the exact opposite of what Joe Blow pulled off and the value of your long bond would be crashed lower than whale $hit.
The Bank of Canada's set rate is now virtually zero, CSB's are paying under 2%.
Anyone but me think interest rates will be going up in the next 3 to 5 years, considering it's pretty much physically impossible to go lower?

So SJP, that is why I feel it would be stupid at this point in time to buy a long bond.
And as to the holding the long bond to maturity logic, that is flat dumb too.
If interest rates are climbing or going to climb and your money is locked for a long time at minimal return you are loosing money constantly sitting on the bond and not having it available for reinvestment at far higher returns.
Thats why the long bond value would be plunging in the first place.

Yes, yes, I agree with all that. But how does that contradict anything I said in my post? On the other hand, you are confirming what I said in my posts. Here you are talking about buying and selling bonds as if they were stocks, to make a quick buck, for capital gains.

In that case, you most certainly have to worry about bonds values going down. But many people buy bonds for the interest income they generate. They are not interested in active buying and selling, they are passive investors.

So suppose somebody is getting income of 40,000 $ in bond interest and that is quite adequate for him to live on. Why should he worry about bond prices fluctuating?

I have a friend who is a financial advisor (not our advisor), he was telling me of just such a case a while ago. He has a client who gets almost 100,000 $ in bond interest every year. There was a period when bonds went up quite a bit and he had a substantial capital gain. He was happy about it. The advisor asked him, do you want to sell any of your bonds? He said no, he wants to hold them to maturity. The advisor asked him then why are you happy about increase in bond prices? They don’t affect you.

So notwithstanding all you said (and I agree with you, I know perfectly well how bonds work), you haven’t contradicted anything I said.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,412
14,522
113
Low Earth Orbit
Here is an example of making money on a bond. This is made simply to illustrate a point.
Back in 1980 Joe Blow buys a 100 dollar 50 year CSB (no such thing bye the way) at 20% interest.
Joe holds the thing to 2010. 30 years at 20% interest pays Joe $600 bucks and he still has his $100 in the original bond.
I'm glad neither of you are my advisors. My calculations have that $100 bond sitting at $910,043.82 after 50 years @ 20%
 
Last edited:

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
On to corporate bonds.
In my original post I stated that corporate bonds were not guaranteed and SJP was wondering what I was talking about.
Only bank accounts of under 100 thou in Canadian charter banks and Canadian Savings Bonds and GIC's are guaranteed by the Canadian Government.
Corporate bonds you take your chances.
When a company defaults or hits the skids the banks get their money out first.
Next up on the carcass are the bondholders, then preferred share holders and finally common shareholders.
So SJP, thats why there can be quite a bit of risk in holding bonds.

And isn't that just what I said in my post? You seem to have this strange habit of repeating what I said and then claiming that I disagree with what you said. I did say in my post that corporate bonds are guaranteed by the corporation and that the only way you will lose your money is if the corporation goes belly up. How is that different from anything you said?


And as to blue chips, you mean like Enron,Dodge,Lehman Bros,Delta Airlines, Bank of America and the like?

Hey, no investment is completely free of risk, there is some risk in any investment. But how many corporations are there in North America? Thousands? A handful of them went belly up in the past several years. So what is the real risk? Minimal, I would say. I have Bell bonds, TD Bank bonds (and others) in my portfolio and I feel perfectly safe in owning them.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
A good laddered bond portfolio will of course be holding a blend of high risk and low risk bonds.
If a higher risk company looks like it will go under you dump the bond at a loss.
If a higher risk company suddenly looks golden you can sell the bond for a profit or sit on it for higher returns at a lower risk rate.
In times of potentially increasing interest rates you should be shortening the maturity lengths on your bond portfolio.
And in times of high rates with a possibility of lower future rates you should be buying longer bonds.

Here you are giving the example of building a portfolio with the view of obtaining capital gains. But there are many investors who build up a bond portfolio with the views of getting the interest income.

And again I come back to what I was saying. Provided these people hold a bond to maturity, they are guaranteed to get their money back, they don't have to worry about bond prices fluctuating.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Here is an example of making money on a bond. This is made simply to illustrate a point.
I'm glad neither of you are my advisors. My calculations have that $100 bond sitting at $910,043.82 after 50 years @ 20%

Why blame me, petros? I didn't give that example.