What Grade Would You Give Obama for First 100 Days?
- Thread starter SirJosephPorter
- Start date
"Extrefire's rants sounds like a ''fact' sheet from the Drudge Report."
gopher, have you ever even clicked onto the Drudge Report? I doubt it. It is painfully obvious that you and SirRupertMurgartroyd (I use that name because he was that way back when on an aother forum when he claimed that the Drudge Report was a conservative website) NEVER read the Drudge Report. If you had, you would know that the Drudge Report is nothing more than a collection of links to other websites, columnists, opinion makers, etc., regardless and in equal measure to both liberals and conservatives.
So, claim that the Drudge Report is conservative. You only reveal your ignorance.
gopher, have you ever even clicked onto the Drudge Report? I doubt it. It is painfully obvious that you and SirRupertMurgartroyd (I use that name because he was that way back when on an aother forum when he claimed that the Drudge Report was a conservative website) NEVER read the Drudge Report. If you had, you would know that the Drudge Report is nothing more than a collection of links to other websites, columnists, opinion makers, etc., regardless and in equal measure to both liberals and conservatives.
So, claim that the Drudge Report is conservative. You only reveal your ignorance.
"Extrafire, about what I would have expected of you (I assume the other ‘F’ belongs to Yukon Jack)."
SirJosephPorter, you are a gift that keeps on giving.
Once again, as usual, you managed to make yourself into the second syllable of the word that wise debaters are wise enough to avoid.
Where have you seen my rating of Obama? Where have you seen anything I posted to give you this silly ASSumption?
SirJosephPorter, you are a gift that keeps on giving.
Once again, as usual, you managed to make yourself into the second syllable of the word that wise debaters are wise enough to avoid.
Where have you seen my rating of Obama? Where have you seen anything I posted to give you this silly ASSumption?
"Even after Yukon predicted it you couldn't resist."
Extafire, this guy is soooo set in his mixed up ways, that he would not know the difference between pulp fiction and Shakespeare. He would declare Shakespeare, produced in paperback, pulp fiction. Just as he would declare Clive Cussler's novels "classics" if they came in hard cover. For a shallow individual contents mean nothing, it is the packaging.
It is a good bet he NEVER logged into Townhall. It is even a better bet he NEVER read anything by Dr. Sowell. (Hell, he hasn't even got the decency to spell the name right).
He chose to impose ignorance upon himself. How can anyone feel towards him anything but pity?
Extafire, this guy is soooo set in his mixed up ways, that he would not know the difference between pulp fiction and Shakespeare. He would declare Shakespeare, produced in paperback, pulp fiction. Just as he would declare Clive Cussler's novels "classics" if they came in hard cover. For a shallow individual contents mean nothing, it is the packaging.
It is a good bet he NEVER logged into Townhall. It is even a better bet he NEVER read anything by Dr. Sowell. (Hell, he hasn't even got the decency to spell the name right).
He chose to impose ignorance upon himself. How can anyone feel towards him anything but pity?
Re #134.
When anyone is so sickly and desperately is hanging onto a flawed concept as Gore is hanging onto his Global Warming nonsense - and has not given up yet, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary - Does anyone think he would have conceded the Presidency if he had thought that he had any reasonable chance to win, with or without the Supreme Court?
He realized that since the people who knew him best (Tennessee) and the people of the State that he should have carried, being the Vice President of an Arkansan, gave him the well-deserved middle digit, he had no business being in any race other than the one to the bathroom to change his diapers.
So, he gave up, the more credit to him, Supreme Court or no Supreme Court.
The Left really should give up on this already. No amount of bitching will change history.
When anyone is so sickly and desperately is hanging onto a flawed concept as Gore is hanging onto his Global Warming nonsense - and has not given up yet, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary - Does anyone think he would have conceded the Presidency if he had thought that he had any reasonable chance to win, with or without the Supreme Court?
He realized that since the people who knew him best (Tennessee) and the people of the State that he should have carried, being the Vice President of an Arkansan, gave him the well-deserved middle digit, he had no business being in any race other than the one to the bathroom to change his diapers.
So, he gave up, the more credit to him, Supreme Court or no Supreme Court.
The Left really should give up on this already. No amount of bitching will change history.
Seven more pages.....188 posts of beating a horse that has been dead eight and a half years.....how long must this go on:?::?::?::roll::roll:
I would imagine until these guys can find something of more earth shattering importance to argue about. People who will argue about politics to begin with obviously are very disillusioned, like arguing who's better Rat one or Rat two.
Wulfie, grading Obama for first 100 days is an intellectual, perhaps idle exercise, and I don’t see anything wrong with it. The grade doesn’t have any practical significance, and probably would change in later days.
And I seriously doubt whether we will be doing the exercise 13 more times. It probably will be repeated when he has been I the office for one year. After two years, well, there are elections.
Yukon Jack, you are simply venting. You frustration, your anger, your bitterness because your party, Republicans received a sound thrashing in 2006 and 2008 is evident in your posts.
Perhaps that is why you are cheering yourself with the wishful thinking that any Republican will win against Obama in 2012. I doubt you really think that, but you wish it to happen.
Anyway, I am keeping a record of this thread and your post claiming that Obama will lose in 2012 on my hard disk. If you turn out to be wrong in 2012 (as I hope you turn out to be), I will post your post again here (assuming of course, that both of us are participating here).
I have a modicum of pity for him being so disconnected from reality. But mainly I feel utter distain toward him.
I think we should average out the concensus and give Obama a "C+" and then close the subject for another year. It's been beaten to death already along with Bush and Gore, and quite frankly I think there's bigger fish to fry.
How about that Joe McCarthy, he is causing a few problems for those commie movie stars.
:roll:
I assume you mean disconnected with ‘conservative’ reality, the reality of the right and the far right. If so, I plead guilty.
History has a nasty habit of repeating itself.
The utter disdain and disrespect America held for Nixon after Watergate resulted in the election of Jimmy Carter.
The totally unrational dislike, fuelled by ignorant left-wing media, for GW Bush resulted in the election of Obama.
Comparing Carter to Obama: one was an over-his-head peanut farmer masquarading as President, the other is an over-his-head community organizer, masquarading as a President.
Carter created the current day Islamic terrorism by being a totally noodle-spined sap instead of giving Iran the well-deserved spanking, that America was still able to deliver in 1979. His blatant incompetance resulted in the election of Ronald Reagan.
Obama's equivalent of Carter's failure of a strong and forceful resolution of the Iraninian hostage taking is still in the future. It may be his incredibly stupid decision of closing Gitmo. It may be the nationalization of car companies. It may be the fact that he tripled Bush's deficit. But whatever, he will be just another Carter. Future Nobel Piss Prize winner, no doubt.
AS for the new Rnald Reagan?? Who knows? It is already obvious that any prospective Republican leader is viciously attacked by the Democrats and their best ally the main stream media. It is also obvious that with a philibuster proof majority in the Senate, the Democrats WILL screw up, just as Republicans screwed up with their majority. And the higher you are the harder you fall.
Meanwhile, left-wingers, spread your hate. It will come back to haunt you. You will be singing a different tune in November 2012.
Save this on your hard drive!
The utter disdain and disrespect America held for Nixon after Watergate resulted in the election of Jimmy Carter.
The totally unrational dislike, fuelled by ignorant left-wing media, for GW Bush resulted in the election of Obama.
Comparing Carter to Obama: one was an over-his-head peanut farmer masquarading as President, the other is an over-his-head community organizer, masquarading as a President.
Carter created the current day Islamic terrorism by being a totally noodle-spined sap instead of giving Iran the well-deserved spanking, that America was still able to deliver in 1979. His blatant incompetance resulted in the election of Ronald Reagan.
Obama's equivalent of Carter's failure of a strong and forceful resolution of the Iraninian hostage taking is still in the future. It may be his incredibly stupid decision of closing Gitmo. It may be the nationalization of car companies. It may be the fact that he tripled Bush's deficit. But whatever, he will be just another Carter. Future Nobel Piss Prize winner, no doubt.
AS for the new Rnald Reagan?? Who knows? It is already obvious that any prospective Republican leader is viciously attacked by the Democrats and their best ally the main stream media. It is also obvious that with a philibuster proof majority in the Senate, the Democrats WILL screw up, just as Republicans screwed up with their majority. And the higher you are the harder you fall.
Meanwhile, left-wingers, spread your hate. It will come back to haunt you. You will be singing a different tune in November 2012.
Save this on your hard drive!
Not at all JLM, it is not a question of being disillusioned. Politics, religion and social issues (such as abortion, gay marriage etc.) always make for passionate, heated, interesting discussions. Hardly anybody changes their mind as a result of these discussions, though.
We participate here to discuss issues, so what is wrong with politics? You may have noticed, it is the thread about politics, religion etc. which generate plenty of passionate discussion.
Post a thread about how good everything is, how we should get along with brotherly love etc. and you will be lucky to get ten responses.
Last edited: