'We’re Talking Big Bucks’: New Bill Puts Oil Companies in Red Over Climate Change

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
'We’re Talking Very Big Bucks’: New Bill Could Put Oil Companies on the Hook for Climate Change Costs

Oil companies have become some of the wealthiest organizations in history by producing a product that we now know is endangering the future of humanity.

Many of these companies have known about the effects of carbon dioxide for decades, yet while they adapted their own businesses to survive climate change, they actively undermined efforts to understand it.

Should Canadians be able to sue oil companies for that?

“They are in a position to pay for this damage; they have the responsibility to pay for this damage,” Peter Tabuns, the NDP’s climate change critic in the Ontario legislature, told DeSmog Canada. “We’re talking very big bucks.”

Tabuns has introduced legislation, the Liability for Climate-Related Harms Act, that would open oil companies up to lawsuits in Ontario.

The bill sets out a legal framework for individuals and the government to sue fossil fuel companies for climate-related damages like flooding or wildfires, and to force them to pay for infrastructure that protects against those effects.

The National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy estimated in 2011 that by 2020 climate change would cost the Canadian economy $5 billion per year — and more than $40 billion by 2050. Around the world, that number is closer to $600 billion annually.

Tabuns’ bill is modelled after lawsuits that are ongoing in the United States.

The question of legal culpability used to be a sticking point for these kinds of cases, but according to Keith Stewart, energy campaigner at Greenpeace Canada, that’s beginning to change.


“We used to say, ‘oh, you can’t attribute any particular disaster to climate change,’ — well, now you can,” he says.

That ability to parse what contribution climate change made to the strength of a hurricane, for example, means a dollar value can now be put on a lawsuit. Directing that lawsuit at a particular company is also now possible thanks to a more thorough accounting of emissions.

“We have evidence of which company has produced which percentage of greenhouse gas emissions,” he says.

https://www.desmog.ca/2018/03/28/we...d-put-oil-companies-hook-climate-change-costs
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
You put oil in your cereal and drink it after pressing 5 lbs. on Fridays.

 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
All cost of this gigantic scam will be passed on to the consumer.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
They kill the world and pay nothing


What had BP paid for the deep water spill?

Peanuts
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,629
14,363
113
Low Earth Orbit
They kill the world and pay nothing


What had BP paid for the deep water spill?

Peanuts

BP fined a record $20.8 billion for oil spill disaster. BP PLC — the company responsible for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill — will pay a record $20.8 billion to the US government to cover damages caused by the disaster, the Department of Justice announced Monday.Oct 5, 2015
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
the BP fine is a small detail Petros, hardly worthy of hoid recognizing it

Interestingly enough though, Transocean and the US Fed bodies that approved everything magically got off the hook though
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
BP fined a record $20.8 billion for oil spill disaster. BP PLC — the company responsible for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill — will pay a record $20.8 billion to the US government to cover damages caused by the disaster, the Department of Justice announced Monday.Oct 5, 2015
Shut up with the facts and let the lefties fantasize.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
'We’re Talking Very Big Bucks’: New Bill Could Put Oil Companies on the Hook for Climate Change Costs

Oil companies have become some of the wealthiest organizations in history by producing a product that we now know is endangering the future of humanity.

Many of these companies have known about the effects of carbon dioxide for decades, yet while they adapted their own businesses to survive climate change, they actively undermined efforts to understand it.

Should Canadians be able to sue oil companies for that?

“They are in a position to pay for this damage; they have the responsibility to pay for this damage,” Peter Tabuns, the NDP’s climate change critic in the Ontario legislature, told DeSmog Canada. “We’re talking very big bucks.”

Tabuns has introduced legislation, the Liability for Climate-Related Harms Act, that would open oil companies up to lawsuits in Ontario.

The bill sets out a legal framework for individuals and the government to sue fossil fuel companies for climate-related damages like flooding or wildfires, and to force them to pay for infrastructure that protects against those effects.

The National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy estimated in 2011 that by 2020 climate change would cost the Canadian economy $5 billion per year — and more than $40 billion by 2050. Around the world, that number is closer to $600 billion annually.

Tabuns’ bill is modelled after lawsuits that are ongoing in the United States.

The question of legal culpability used to be a sticking point for these kinds of cases, but according to Keith Stewart, energy campaigner at Greenpeace Canada, that’s beginning to change.


“We used to say, ‘oh, you can’t attribute any particular disaster to climate change,’ — well, now you can,” he says.

That ability to parse what contribution climate change made to the strength of a hurricane, for example, means a dollar value can now be put on a lawsuit. Directing that lawsuit at a particular company is also now possible thanks to a more thorough accounting of emissions.

“We have evidence of which company has produced which percentage of greenhouse gas emissions,” he says.

https://www.desmog.ca/2018/03/28/we...d-put-oil-companies-hook-climate-change-costs

SO you found someone to quote that is as stupid as you are. Still Don't make it fact when you quote bull$hit.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
What Do Oil Companies Have To Do To Survive The Future?

Houston’s oil and gas companies are doing better since the price of oil has improved.

But is their current path sustainable for the future?

The writing’s on the well, a report by consulting firm Accenture, suggests it is not, and that energy companies will be left behind unless they change their business models.

Muqsit Ashraf, global managing director for energy at Accenture Strategy, authored the report.

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/...l-companies-have-to-do-to-survive-the-future/
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
The writing's on the well

Oil and gas companies are about to enter a new paradigm. It is being shaped by a combination of factors that are flipping the energy industry on its head. Among them:

Supply abundance: Technical advances have swelled reserves and lowered price ceilings.

Demand evolution: Customer interest in clean electricity, petrochemical and gas-powered solutions creates new battlegrounds for margins and returns.

Growth of renewables: The cost of extracting energy from solar and wind resources is nearing parity with fossil fuels. Our analyses suggest that solar and wind may be 30 percent cheaper than coal and gas by 2035. That sets the stage for an irreversible decline in hydrocarbon consumption. By some projections, hydrocarbons’ dominance in the energy mix will fall from 80 percent today to just above half by 2060.

https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-oil-gas-resources