Well, at least it's a short trip to the Pole. And rumour has it there's a fat guy with milk and cookies there.If they don’t, Canadians could be headed to the polls during the Christmas season.
Well, at least it's a short trip to the Pole. And rumour has it there's a fat guy with milk and cookies there.If they don’t, Canadians could be headed to the polls during the Christmas season.
We'll be voting this winter.The Carney government tried to inoculate itself against charges of austerity on Wednesday as François-Philippe Champagne promised “sustained funding” for gender equality programs. Phew! But what the finance minister’s right hand giveth, his left hand is set to taketh away in next week’s budget.
As the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives identified in a new research paper, the “sacrifices” Carney referred in his recent speech at the University of Ottawa will likely be made by stealth. Rather than announcing major cuts, the left-wing think tank warned that 32 of 84 departments could meet their government-ordered 15 per cent budget cuts by simply not renewing programs that are due to “sunset.” Another 20 departments could reduce their spending by five per cent by sunsetting.
If those programs are not renewed, all staff positions and contracts simply end.
The most exposed department is Women and Gender Equality, which has very few permanent programs. Hence, the reason why the minister, Rechie Valdez, looked so relieved when she announced more than $600 million in long-term funding for her department on Wednesday.![]()
Federal government's plan to reduce public service will include layoffs — National Post
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne seemed to confirm the plan when he said that Ottawa would implement 'workforce adjustments'apple.news
But the departments of Crown-Indigenous Relations, Environment, Transport and Immigration, and the Public Health Agency, may not be so lucky.
Spending on Indigenous issues, which has quadrupled in the last decade, may be particularly vulnerable.
“Canadians should brace themselves for for one of the most draconian federal budgets in history,” wrote the think-tank report’s authors David Macdonald and Erin Mcintosh.
The bone Champagne threw to the Liberal party’s progressive wing on Wednesday was likely considered a necessary evil. The minority government can’t afford any of its squeamish MPs going wobbly when the budget comes to a vote.
The prospect of the government losing a confidence vote is not out of the question, though it was noticeable that the NDP’s interim leader, Don Davies, did not say his seven MPs would vote against the financial plan, even as he said they would not support an austerity budget. Leaderless, penniless and mired in the polls, discretion would appear to be the better part of valour. A few discrete New Democrat abstentions would be enough to see the budget pass through the House of Commons.![]()
John Ivison: Watch for Carney to deliver a ‘draconian’ budget by stealth — National Post
The idea that the Liberals might take a hatchet to their treasured social programs seems counterintuitive, but that's where the savings areapple.news
With days to go before Prime Minister Mark Carney tables his first federal budget, opportunities to secure alliances to help it pass are dwindling in a parliamentary scenario where a handful of (NDP?) votes stand between the survival of the Liberal minority government and its total collapse.A few discrete New Democrat abstentions would be enough to see the budget pass through the House of Commons.



The government has warned of the possibility of a snap election unless at least one other party steps forward to allow approval of the budget, which will be tabled Tuesday.The minority Liberals have 169 seats — just three seats shy of a majority — which means that they need to find at least three (NDP?) MPs from the opposition benches to either support their budget or abstain to ensure that they survive the confidence vote on the budget.
NDP Interim Leader Don Davies said it’s “possible” that some NDP MPs opt to neither vote for or against the budget.If they don’t, Canadians could be headed to the polls during the Christmas season.
“Abstentions are allowed,” he said during an interview with CBC News that aired Sunday. He stood by those comments in a later e-mail exchange with The Globe and Mail.“Of course, they don’t have the numbers yet,” said Lori Turnbull, professor in the Faculty of Management at Dalhousie University, in an interview. “Surely, they can’t expect the opposition parties to say they’re going to support (the budget) when they haven’t seen it.”


Why can’t these politicals and their advisors read the room . They propped up the Liberals for four years when their popularity had tanked . The NDP could be sitting in opposition right now if they voted against the liberals .And here they are again talking about supporting them again . All those seats for grab and they are making themselves irrelevant.Tomorrow’s budget will be the government’s first fiscal update in almost a year and the first time Prime Minister Mark Carney has signed off an economic plan for the country since forming government during the spring election more than 1/2 a year ago now.
The Liberals are three seats shy of a majority, meaning they will need a few (NDP) opposition MPs to either support or abstain when the budget vote comes — sometime in the coming weeks.
Historically, the Liberals have turned to the NDP but interim Leader Don Davies said he wants to see where the cuts are in the budget before deciding, etc…![]()
Champagne promises a budget with something for all Canadians — even the opposition — CBC News
On the eve of presenting his first budget, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne suggested the hotly anticipated document will include measures that even the opposition parties will see worth supporting.apple.news
View attachment 31865
He did not rule out a scenario in which some of the seven NDP MPs opt to vote neither for nor against the budget.
It’s not that the NDP “wants” to support the Liberals regardless of what’s in their budget, but that they really don’t have a choice. It Carney throws a couple of magic beans in there for the NDP to save face, they’ll support it…& if Carney doesn’t, they’ll abstain from voting which accomplishes the same thing for Carney.Why can’t these politicals and their advisors read the room . They propped up the Liberals for four years when their popularity had tanked . The NDP could be sitting in opposition right now if they voted against the liberals .And here they are again talking about supporting them again . All those seats for grab and they are making themselves irrelevant.
What does the NDP want the most that Trump's tariffs didn't already give? Forestry is fucked so there will be more trees that mature in 25 years to hug and burn in 30. We're going nuclear and hydrogen. The air is pretty damn clean there isn't a whale shortage. Forced into expanding markets. Unions have pretty much all struke. What's left?It’s not that the NDP “wants” to support the Liberals regardless of what’s in their budget, but that they really don’t have a choice. It Carney throws a couple of magic beans in there for the NDP to save face, they’ll support it…& if Carney doesn’t, they’ll abstain from voting which accomplishes the same thing for Carney.
(The NDP desperately needs to be seen as something other than the Liberals lapdog)
They (the NDP) already have made themselves irrelevant. That’s just that. They had their non-coalition coalition that definitely was not a coalition-type coalition, for two freak’n years propping up Justin Trudeau who was beyond toxic, and the stank rubbed off on them, and the electorate politically spanked them.
The NDP party is bereft of ideas, leadership, seats in parliament and they’re broke. Jagmeet Singh and the NDP ran their disastrous campaign on borrowed money – millions of dollars – and there is no clear pathway for them to dig their way out. They don’t have any significant fundraising infrastructure (this has long been the case), their coming leadership race will siphon any available NDP donors away from party giving towards candidate giving, and their debts are continuing to pile up.
They’re in no way, shape, or form to go into an election, and every other party knows it. For the NDP, regardless of the noise they make, they will support this budget one way or another, whether directly or through hiding under the bed during the vote on the confidence motion. Political dead man walking.
The NDP do not make up their vote on the hustings . They spend like it is important but the reality is they have a small base and the rest of their support comes from liberals .It’s not that the NDP “wants” to support the Liberals regardless of what’s in their budget, but that they really don’t have a choice. It Carney throws a couple of magic beans in there for the NDP to save face, they’ll support it…& if Carney doesn’t, they’ll abstain from voting which accomplishes the same thing for Carney.
(The NDP desperately needs to be seen as something other than the Liberals lapdog)
They (the NDP) already have made themselves irrelevant. That’s just that. They had their non-coalition coalition that definitely was not a coalition-type coalition, for two freak’n years propping up Justin Trudeau who was beyond toxic, and the stank rubbed off on them, and the electorate politically spanked them.
The NDP party is bereft of ideas, leadership, seats in parliament and they’re broke. Jagmeet Singh and the NDP ran their disastrous campaign on borrowed money – millions of dollars – and there is no clear pathway for them to dig their way out. They don’t have any significant fundraising infrastructure (this has long been the case), their coming leadership race will siphon any available NDP donors away from party giving towards candidate giving, and their debts are continuing to pile up.
They’re in no way, shape, or form to go into an election, and every other party knows it. For the NDP, regardless of the noise they make, they will support this budget one way or another, whether directly or through hiding under the bed during the vote on the confidence motion. Political dead man walking.
They need to center up to be relevant.The NDP do not make up their vote on the hustings . They spend like it is important but the reality is they have a small base and the rest of their support comes from liberals .
They were with Mulclair .They need to center up to be relevant.
Dude is describing IFTA without mentioning IFTA (international fuel tax agreement), it’s for every jurisdiction in the US and Canada (except for a couple of oddball states on the left coast of the US that aren’t in the program) for road taxes that’s hidden in the fuel costs.![]()
Why we needed a permit to cross provinces
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.youtube.com