I can't WAIT until the Cons and Poo-lover get in. The overnight reversal in commenters' positions and attitudes'll be a STITCH!
It seems rabble and Wiki have differing ideas of what the Conservative's election laws were. By Wiki version, I can see why turdOWE cancelled many of them. They would not act in his interest.Admittedly I haven't followed the stuff about the China issue because I thought it was pretty clear - Investigate publicly and share what's learned - and I expected Trudeau to fuck it up.
Then this popped up in my feed.
Which got me wondering after Dominic LeBlanc (the fathead and unfortunately the MP for my region... no I didn't vote for him but he's French so...) called PP out for something he said yesterday, I got looking into things.
![]()
Trudeau avoids inquiry; Poilievre forgets own record on electoral shenanigans
Public inquiries and electoral interference; two issues with complicated track records for the Trudeau Liberals and Poilievre's Conservatives.rabble.ca
![]()
Fair Elections Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Sooner Trudeau's gone the better, but I have to wonder, as the article brings up at the end, where would we be if PP's little bill had continued; just how would our elections be more secure?
To clarify, I honestly think NO government is safe when it comes to China because China - the Government - can't be trusted at all. Their own ideas of Manifest Destiny are what is driving them to all this, and there are too many people who put greed over everything else to let their will be done.
Me too.I can't WAIT until the Cons and Poo-lover get in. The overnight reversal in commenters' positions and attitudes'll be a STITCH!
Rumor has it that Trudeau and her are doing the Jolie .She's kinda jolie. For a politician.
Of course they have something to hide and more importantly someone to hide.Rather than explain what he knows, Trudeau is suggesting there will be an investigation into what he knows. Will NSICOP study whether it, itself, already briefed the prime minister? Will it feature members of the committee asking themselves questions?![]()
Opinion: The eight excuses of Liberal MPs to duck a public inquiry (and none of them are good enough) — The Globe and Mail
The Liberals see many stumbling blocks on the path to an independent public inquiry into China’s election meddlingapple.news
The federal Conservatives, New Democrats and Bloc Quebecois have all called for a public inquiry even though information could come out that would hurt them. Only the Liberals have resisted the public knowing more about this issue and that makes them look guilty.![]()
NP View: Trudeau Liberals’ familiar scandal playbook — sow confusion — National Post
The goal is to drag the scandal out until no one can remember why it mattersapple.news
Justin Trudeau’s Liberals are certainly desperate to stop Katie Telford from testifying about China’s election interference.
![]()
Trade Minister Mary Ng did not consider resigning, repaying money after ethics breach — CTV News
Canada's minister for international trade says she never considered resigning after the federal ethics commissioner found she broke rules by awarding a contract to a friend.apple.news
Telford, Trudeau’s chief of staff, has testified before Commons committees at least twice in the past couple of years on controversial topics with no issues.
That fact really does make you wonder why the Liberals are so adamant that Telford not testify. It certainly feeds into the notion that the Liberals have something to hide.
![]()
LILLEY: What does Katie Telford know that Liberals want to keep under wraps? — Toronto Sun
She has appeared before Commons committees before, so what are the Liberals hiding on election interference?apple.news
Many more than someone .Of course they have something to hide and more importantly someone to hide.
Trudeau’s smugness and the arrogance of his MPs this week in filibustering a parliamentary committee that sought to force the prime minister’s chief of staff, Katie Telford, to testify about what security briefings she and Trudeau received on foreign interference in our elections. It was a shocking abuse of parliamentary process.Rather than explain what he knows, Trudeau is suggesting there will be an investigation into what he knows. Will NSICOP study whether it, itself, already briefed the prime minister? Will it feature members of the committee asking themselves questions?
Instead of calling a public inquiry, Trudeau will appoint a “rapporteur” — whatever that is — to probe the interference. So this yet-to-be-named person of his choice will investigate him. So much for transparency. Trudeau will investigate himself.The federal Conservatives, New Democrats and Bloc Quebecois have all called for a public inquiry even though information could come out that would hurt them. Only the Liberals have resisted the public knowing more about this issue and that makes them look guilty.
After watching all those clips am once again reminded why I hate LIEberals .Canadians want a PUBLIC Inquiry. Trudeau wants a “Repporteur” that he picks to secretly decide if there should be a public inquiry or not…bypassing parliament and the desire of more than 70% of Canadians.
The irony, that Bardish Chagger (Former Trudeau Cabinet Minister & the Minister of Excuses) is Chairing this fiasco of a Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs….wow…that’s wow….from testifying in a previous Liberal Scandal in front of an Ethics Committee (WE) to the Chair of this current one?:
…or on the SNC-Lavalamp Scandal:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zp458HaWlTc
“Holy Optics Batpeople!!”