Jesus Christ woman, open your ears and eyes. Several universities in the US have opted for segregated student housing, at the behest of Black students and SJWs. Here's a short list; Reed College, Cornell, UC Berkeley, Williams College and Stanford. Then we have Wesleyan with not one, not two, but SIX segregated residences, each for a different minority group. Of 173 schools surveyed in the US, 42% have segregated residences, 46% offer segregated orientation programs, and 72% host segregated graduation ceremonies. It's called “neo-segregation”: the voluntary and institutionally sanctioned segregation of minority students.
I hadn't heard of any of that, but I will look into it now, thanks.
And if it's as you say, then I'd question why. If the housing is just offered, or was requested by students of different race/color, and that students can share dorms OR go to these 'segregated' dorms, then... well honestly it's not my business if students want to isolate themselves by 'race' or not, that's on them. Uni's will do what students want to make them 'happy' and more productive even if it seems dumbass and counter productive. I wouldn't be good with it, but I don't go to those schools and I'm not black and have the problems black students would have, so...
If they're being FORCED, that's a whole other issue and outright wrong and you would have a point.
But of course that falls under the leftist motto of: "It's only okay when we do it. It's not racism when we engage in racism".
Nice broadbrush of you and no, that's not the "leftist motto", that's a motto people like to claim is left just to make themselves feel "not left".
Irony is, some of those same people would be okay with that situation, or none of those 'non white' students going to Uni at all. The big deal they make over the issue is only because, IMO, they don't get to do it themselves.
As for asking "which race theory" is being supported, I think you fucking well know.
No, I don't.
Are you talking CRT which is a university class? If so, that's one thing and an actual justified class taught to cross-discipline students, usually law and social/civic students. Wouldn't have been my thing in Uni, but that's only because I wanted a completely different study. For students into societal issues, CRT matters.
And since it's a theory, instead of bitching about it, I'd like to see more people try to disprove it if they want to get rid of it so bad.
If you mean the supposed CRT being taught in lower grade schools, that's a non-existent thing that some people whine, bitch, freak out about because what they're really against is ACTUAL history being taught, and only label it CRT because they're fucking ignorant.
So which is it?