Wasted resources in war on terror

Lineman

No sparks please
Feb 27, 2006
452
7
18
Winnipeg, Manitoba
I have done some reading on a cople of other forums where our Canadian Forces personnel post. They understand why Canada is in Afghanistan. Those that are there see it every day. My wife's nephew is there. He had questions about it before he left. He has experienced the plight of people there, he now knows why he is there and couldn't be more commited to making a better life for them. The father of the soldier who was killed recently spoke on TV about how his son understood why they were there. He also understood and despite the loss of a loved one still spoke of how we should continue to help these people. There are those on this thread who want this country to pull back and stand idly by. We and the rest of the world did that with Rwanda, it was a terrifying failure. If those who oppose do not wish to listen to my opinions I have no problem with it but please listen to the ones who are there and are "fighting the good fight and healing the wounds". They are living the conflict, they are the ones willing to die for it, and they believe they are doing the right thing. To Mogz and your brothers: Thank you for all you are doing and all that you will do. You have my utmost respect and support.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Wow, five years in Afghanistan, really four and half. People nowadays just don't like war, but the terrorist threat is still out there. We like freedom and someone has to do the dirty work for us. Cdn soldiers do a good job in Afghanistan, they are appreciated.

We have to be in Afghanistan to keep that divided country from collapsing. The poorest country in the world that was pasted together after colonialism is a prime candidate to be a failed state. Which it was under the Taliban.

There is no comparing Afghanistan to Vietnam.

Canada might be getting a bad press over Afghanistan by handing over prisoners to the US who then ship them to Gitmo. Canada should denounce Gitmo.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: Wasted resources in w

Promised aid money for Iraq has not been forthcoming, in fact it,s decreased every year since the invasion,and the drug trade is bigger than it was during the Taliban years there is not even the slightest possible chance that Canada can make a dent in the poverty and ignorance and bloodshed, we are there for PR work for Uncle Sam. If our troops understand why they are in Afghanistan why don,t the people of Canada, or is this to sensitive to share with civilian Canadians.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Wasted resources in w

darkbeaver said:
If our troops understand why they are in Afghanistan why don,t the people of Canada, or is this to sensitive to share with civilian Canadians.

Hmmm, I know why were there...I'm Canadian a citizen.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Boy, everybody loves to have it both ways when they
criticize.

When aid is coming, you get to attack the unique few
and ONLY corporations in the world willing and big
enough to rebuild the infrastructure of a nation in a
war zone. Nobody in their right mind, much less a
business finds a war zone rewarding enough.

Oh you think so ?

Then why aren't there more than 3 companies in the
world that would even dare contract for business in a
war zone ?

And what companies have the logistical capability
to mount such an operation in a war zone ?

And so it was American companies raping Iraq, when
in reality they had to get the pay to build a power
plant in a war zone, or fix a pipeline that might
bring more revenue to rebuild this phoenix of a nation.

Now the American companies are gone, because the
Iraqis have taken over the handing out of contracts,
and so these contracts are smaller, cheaper, and they're
going to Iraqi companies and Iraqi citizens.

Not without a little corruption of course, and in most
of the world that's a cost of doing business and getting
the job done.

And by the way governmental aid works as well or
worse than business aid to rebuild.

And the terrorists are making sure no rebuilding occurs.

But they're hurting.

It's turning out to be a long lonely haul for the terrorists
as the citizens gain more guts and vicious strength
to strike terror in the heart of the terrorists.

You're watching the birth of a new nation.

And from what I've seen, a birth is not without pain
for this microwave, video gaming want it now generation
of critics.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: Wasted resources in w

Jimmoyer said;
"When aid is coming, you get to attack the unique few
and ONLY corporations in the world willing and big
enough to rebuild the infrastructure of a nation in a
war zone. Nobody in their right mind, much less a
business finds a war zone rewarding enough."

Right and you don,t find it a bit strange that the same corporations who built and delivered the bombs that destroyed the country in the first place are the same who get to rebuild the damaged infrastructure. What i,m saying in case you don,t get the drift, is that the destruction and the rebuilding are being done by the same people. Now what is right minded about that?
 

Canuckgirl

New Member
Mar 1, 2006
10
0
1
Re: RE: Wasted resources in w

darkbeaver said:
And you on the Retarded Religious Redundant Reprehensible Right only use the UN when it suits your purpose. I,am suprised that you resort to The UN as an argument for our involvment. What are we doing there? Are we saving and helping Afgans or are we saving and helping Americans? And don,t tell me that there the same thing.

I am so with you darkbeaver. These "obligations" that are being spoken of simply mean that we are kowtowing to the Americans once again. Not that Afghanistan isn't something that we should be involved in but what ever happened to peacekeeping missions as Canadians? Weren't we being recognized around the world as the best peacekeepers around? Why must we start picking up the slack for the US? And at the cost of our soldiers? I say we go back to what we were good at doing, peacekeeping, and tell the US to go *&^$ itself.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Wasted resources in w

Canuckgirl said:
darkbeaver said:
And you on the Retarded Religious Redundant Reprehensible Right only use the UN when it suits your purpose. I,am suprised that you resort to The UN as an argument for our involvment. What are we doing there? Are we saving and helping Afgans or are we saving and helping Americans? And don,t tell me that there the same thing.

I am so with you darkbeaver. These "obligations" that are being spoken of simply mean that we are kowtowing to the Americans once again. Not that Afghanistan isn't something that we should be involved in but what ever happened to peacekeeping missions as Canadians? Weren't we being recognized around the world as the best peacekeepers around? Why must we start picking up the slack for the US? And at the cost of our soldiers? I say we go back to what we were good at doing, peacekeeping, and tell the US to go *&^$ itself.

It's called being an ally...


Lots of nation do peacekeeping, but it isn't our only role as a country, nor should we be limiting ourselves. The Liberal have reduced our roles to peace keeping and have decimated our forces....expect that to change while conservative run the show.
 

PoisonPete2

Electoral Member
Apr 9, 2005
651
0
16
Re: RE: Wasted resources in w

Jay said:
Canuckgirl said:
darkbeaver said:
to what we were good at doing, peacekeeping, and tell the US to go *&^$ itself.

It's called being an ally...
quote]

RESPONSE: Canadian soldiers are in Afghanistan to protect a puppet government by killing other Afghans in Afghanistan. The Afghans the soldiers kill are supposed to be supporters of those Afghans deposed by the American led invasion of Afghan soil because the Americans were really pissed about a bunch of (mostly Saudi) muslims using commercial jets to attack targets on 9/11..We all know that the training for those attacks took place in the USA, not Afghanistan. Using boxcutters on air crew was not the key component of those attacks. Flying the aircraft was.

This is not "being an ally" so much as participating in 'a conspiracy to commit murder'.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
I guess the Taliban should have listened to us....
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
We and the rest of the world did that with Rwanda, it was a terrifying failure.

Exactly, i've said that before. We sat around on our asses while the Hutus slaughtered the Tutsi's. Are you, Canadian citizens, honestly expecting us to repeat that scenario with Afghanistan? We're in 'ghan for many reasons; we're there to fight militants, we're there to help Afghan's, and most importantly we're there to ensure a better World for tomorrow whether that view on the World be Afghani or Canadian.

Lineman i'd like to thank you for your post. I posted it in to an email I just sent to a few buddys of mine in Kandahar right now. I'm sure they'll appreciate knowing that some Canadians are 100% behind them.

Promised aid money for Iraq has not been forthcoming, in fact it,s decreased every year since the invasion,and the drug trade is bigger than it was during the Taliban years there is not even the slightest possible chance that Canada can make a dent in the poverty and ignorance and bloodshed, we are there for PR work for Uncle Sam. If our troops understand why they are in Afghanistan why don,t the people of Canada, or is this to sensitive to share with civilian Canadians.

I don't see how Iraq aid money ties in with Afghanistan. With regard to opium trade, you're half right. In the North, near Kabul, the opium farms are almost completely gone. My father is now an MP Officer and during his tour in 2003 his multinational company raided dozens of farms and burnt the poppy crops. Then they provided the farms with grain and other things to grow instead. In the South, near Kandahar, the trade is still flourishing, however we recently showed up in the South in force. Give us a roto or two and we'll do exactly what we did to the North. As for the bloodshed/poverty/ignorance, we've made a huge "dent". Random killings in the streets are a thing of the past. People aren't tortured for not having a long enough beard (this used to happen under the Taliban). On the poverty angle we've helped them on an epic scale. We provided them food, clothes, grain, building materials, even radios. We do everything we can for these people, and it's not simply handouts. Our teams go out and teach them how to improve their lives. Tremendous strides have been taken since 2001 and you can see the improvements when you walk around the villages. Our citizens don't know why we're in 'ghan because for years they didn't care and for years they've pretended it was a peacekeeping mission. Now they're seeing bodys come home and they've got a "more honest" Government in power that is telling them like it is. "troops will die, we have to be ready for it".

I am so with you darkbeaver. These "obligations" that are being spoken of simply mean that we are kowtowing to the Americans once again. Not that Afghanistan isn't something that we should be involved in but what ever happened to peacekeeping missions as Canadians?

I hope you get hit by a bus and I witness it. First off we're not "kowtowing" to the U.S. in Afghanistan because we've been doing our own thing since 2002. We haven't been embedded with them for years. Our missions are planned and carried out by Canadians. Only now in Kandahar are we working with the U.S. because the Airfield is the only safe place to house ourselves...an airfield we share with the U.S. Secondly, you're just the example I needed. Everyone that has read my posts on moron Canadians thinking we're a "peacekeeping" nation, take note. Canuckgirl we are a war fighting nation, always have been and always will be. The media over the decades has built the CF in to this peace and love and hippy organization that doesn't go to war. We haven't been on a peacekeeping mission since 2000. That's over half a decade. Furthermore i'd like to point out that in the 20th Century we spent more years at war than peacekeeping. Lastly, yes we are seen as the Worlds best peacekeepers, but not because that's all we do. We're seen in this light because of the quality of soldiers we produce. Men and women we can send in to adverse situations and expect them to exercise restraint in the hopes of bettering a situation.

And at the cost of our soldiers?

116 Canadian soldiers have been killed while peacekeeping. You make peacekeeping sound so safe and moral, when in reality it is dangerous, even more so than combat because you're confined in the actions you can take.

I say we go back to what we were good at doing, peacekeeping, and tell the US to go *&^$ itself.

Well lucky for Canada you're not in a position to make a call like this. Some FYI, no soldier would ever agree that we're a peacekeeping nation. You live in a bubble.
 

Lineman

No sparks please
Feb 27, 2006
452
7
18
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Canuckgirl Quote- I say we go back to what we were good at doing, peacekeeping

I can't figure out if it's arrogance or ignorance?
Pulling out of Afghanistan and letting them fend for themselves is so contrary to what I believe being "Canadian" is. Our soldiers are there because it's part of the Canadian "ethic" to defend those less fortunate than us. Well it used to be......Hmmm who do we blame for that....Wasted resources? How much is an Afghan life worth... is it the same as a Canadian?
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
In the Vancouver Sun newspaper on Saturday, Mar 11, it said the Cdn military contingent increased from 140 in 2001 to 2000 in 2006 with very little public debate on the subject. The political classes agree Afgh is important, but permit little discussion of it in Parliament.

I saw on the CBC yesterday that even for the Korean war there was no vote in Parliament for it- and it was a UN mission. We didn't vote on World War I because we were part of the British Empire so were automatically involved. But Cdn parliamentarians did vote on entering World War II in 1939. The debate on Yugoslavia in the 1990s was also very sparse. The Dutch debate war issues endlessly, so should we.

The elite has worries, for most of living memory, we Cdns have thought of ourselves as a peacekeeping nation. Only a tiny percentage of Cdns have ever been in the military, it is an elitist organization. What the public feels about war we learn from the media and the media in Canada does reflect what the public thinks. Most people don't like getting shot at or shooting other people.

That could be why Foreign Affairs Minister Mackay says that any discussion might demoralize the troops. Funny how issues that involve foreigners like war and immigration never get extensive debate and a straightforward vote in Parliament. Harper said that during the election the cheap slogan "Standing up for Canada" was debate about Afgh. Hardly.

It is not moronic to help Afghanis with millions of dollars, they need help now. The Cdn military already gets billions of dollars, few Cdn civilians are dying in the war on terror.

Gwynne Dyer stats that the US has been conducting military exercises with India this year, part of a geopolitical plan to contain China. US soldiers that could be used to fight in Afgh and pacify the country are being wasted. Afgh is now just a pawn in the the military-industrial complex's endless war on terror.

The elite and military can have their current Kandahar mission, but after that it is time to open up the process.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
I wonder if the Far Left and the Far Right ever care
about the people.

They defecate on each other grabbing each issue
as props, um, I mean, as turds to drop on each other.

Meanwhile both Far Left and Far Right really really
don't care about the people in Afghanistan.

The Far Left won't even have the guts to lead
in an issue like Dafur. 200 Canadian soldiers ???
Any French soldiers ? Are they too weak to lead
on this issue ?

And the Far Right, they care little for karma, make
the whole Middle East glass.

A song for us:

Well I don't know why I came here tonight

I got the feeling that something ain't right

I'm so scared in case I fall off my chair

And I'm wondering how I'll get down the stairs

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right

Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.




It is just a means to argue at each other.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Wasted resources in war on terror

jimmoyer said:
And the Far Right, they care little for karma, make
the whole Middle East glass.

We were just kidding.... :)

It's an "only if we had to" sorta thing.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
On the CBC I they showed last night an attack from the Taliban, originating from Pakistan. The Taliban are firing these big long shoulder-held missiles and some Coalition helicopter gunships do a flyby in response but not much else. The Taliban hide in the trees and smile, unworried.

Why aren't there any troops immediately dropped on the ground to pursue these Taliban? You know, to make the Taliban worry about getting captured or killed? The Taliban are taunting the Coalition forces with these raids.

The US needs 10,000 more troops in Afghanistan right away to deal with these immediate threats. Yet troop exercises with India are more important.

I must say the Cdn troops do look very good, al-Qaeda and the Taliban seem to melt away when they appear. Only insane indviduals attack them. Happily, and suspiciously, casualties are very low.