Unlike the Arab countries, that can show a long tradition of coexistence with Jews (notwithstanding discrimination though)
Details, details, eh? The Jews got along just fine as long as they knew their place.
Unlike the Arab countries, that can show a long tradition of coexistence with Jews (notwithstanding discrimination though)
The exodus of some 125.000 Iraqi Jews to Israel started in 1949;
that of about 165.000 North-African Jews took place as late as 1955-1957. It is therefore somewhat awkward to claim that Israel had deported its Arabs because of the exodus of Arab Jews that occurred years later.
Details, details, eh? The Jews got along just fine as long as they knew their place.
[SIZE=-1]Father Rantisi was born in Lyda, now the site of Ben Gurion Airport, in 1937. From 1955 to 1958 he attended the Bible College of Wales, moving in 1963 to continue his studies at Aurora College in the state of Illinois. He then served as a missionary in Sudan. In 1965 he opened the Evangelical Home for Boys in Ramallah, West Bank. In 1976 Father Rantisi was elected as Ramallah's deputy mayor and he is now the director of the orphanage of the Evangelical Home of Boys.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]From "Blessed are the Peacemakers ...The History of a Palestinian Christian"[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]I cannot forget three horror-filled days in July of 1948. The pain sears my memory, and I cannot rid myself of it no matter how hard I try.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] First, Israeli soldiers forced thousands of Palestinians from their homes near the Mediterranean coast, even though some families had lived in the same houses for centuries. (My family had been in the town of Lydda inPalestine at least 1,600 years). Then, without water, we stumbled into the hills and continued for three deadly days. The Jewish soldiers followed, occasionally shooting over our heads to scare us and keep us moving.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Terror filled my eleven-year-old mind as I wondered what would happen. I remembered overhearing my father and his friends express alarm about recent massacres by Jewish terrorists. Would they kill us, too?[/SIZE]![]()
[SIZE=-1] We did not know what to do, except to follow orders and stumble blindly up the rocky hills. I walked hand in hand with my grandfather, who carried our only remaining possessions-a small tin of sugar and some milk for my aunt's two-year-old son, sick with typhoid.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] The horror began when Zionist soldiers deceived us into leaving our homes, then would not let us go back, driving us through a small gate just outside Lydda. I remember the scene well: thousands of frightened people being herded like cattle through the narrow opening by armed soldiers firing overhead. In front of me a cart wobbled toward the gate. Alongside, a lady struggled, carrying her baby, pressed by the crowd. Suddenly, in the jostling of the throngs, the child fell. The mother shrieked in agony as the cart's metal-rimmed wheel ran over her baby's neck. That infant's death was the most awful sight I had ever seen.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Outside the gate the soldiers stopped us and ordered everyone to throw all valuables onto a blanket. One young man and his wife of six weeks, friends of our family, stood near me. He refused to give up his money. Almost casually, the soldier pulled up his rifle and shot the man. He fell, bleeding and dying while his bride screamed and cried. I felt nauseated and sick, my whole body numbed by shock waves. That night I cried, too, as I tried to sleep alongside thousands on the ground. Would I ever see my home again? Would the soldiers kill my loved ones, too?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Early the next morning we heard more shots and sprang up. A bullet just missed me and killed a donkey nearby. Everybody started running as a stampede. I was terror-stricken when I lost sight of my family, and I frantically searched all day as the crowd moved along.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] That second night, after the soldiers let us stop, I wandered among the masses of people, desperately searching and calling. Suddenly in the darkness I heard my father's voice. I shouted out to him. What joy was in me! I had thought I would never see him again. As he and my mother held me close, I knew I could face whatever was necessary. The next day brought more dreadful experiences. Still branded on my memory is a small child beside the road, sucking the breast of its dead mother. Along the way I saw many stagger and fall. Others lay dead or dying in the scorching midsummer heat. Scores of pregnant women miscarried, and their babies died along the wayside. The wife of my father's cousin became very thirsty. After a long while she said she could not continue. Soon she slumped down and was dead. Since we could not carry her we wrapped her in cloth, and after praying, just left her beside a tree. I don't know what happened to her body.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] We eventually found a well, but had no way to get water. Some of the men tied a rope around my father's cousin and lowered him down, then pulled him out, and gave us water squeezed from his clothing. The few drops helped, but thirst still tormented me as I marched along in the shadeless, one-hundred plus degree heat.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] We trudged nearly twenty miles up rocky hills, then down into deep valleys, then up again, gradually higher and higher. Finally we found a main road, where some Arabs met us. They took some of us in trucks to Ramallah, ten miles north of Jerusalem. I lived in a refugee tent camp for the next three and one-half years. We later learned that two Jewish families had taken over our family home in Lydda.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Those wretched days and nights in mid-July of 1948 continue as a lifelong nightmare because Zionists took away our home of many centuries. For me and a million other Palestinian Arabs, tragedy had marred our lives forever.
Throughout his life my father remembered and suffered. For thirty-one years before his death in 1979, he kept the large metal key to our house in Lydda.
After more than four decades I still bear the emotional scars of the Zionist invasion. Yet, as an adult, I see what I did not fully understand then: that the Jews are also human beings, themselves driven by fear, victims of history's worst outrages, rabidly, sometimes almost mindlessly searching for security. Lamentably, they have victimized my people.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Four years after our flight from Lydda I dedicated my life to the service of Jesus Christ. Like me and my fellow refugees, Jesus had lived in adverse circumstances, often with only a stone for a pillow. As with his fellow Jews two thousand years ago and the Palestinians today, an outside power controlled his homeland-my homeland. They tortured and killed him in Jerusalem, only ten miles from Ramallah, and my new home. He was the victim of terrible indignities. Nevertheless, Jesus prayed on behalf of those who engineered his death, "Father, forgive them..."[/SIZE]
http://www.alnakba.org/testimony/audeh.htm
Its not ethnic cleansing because it wasn't their land. That has been shown. They were workers living in company housing for pay. Thats no different than farm hands, you get fired from the job or it closes down or sells out, you move out.
I don't challenge the fact that Jews in Muslim Arab countries faced discrimination and harassment. So did Christians, most non-Muslims or Muslims of the wrong sect. The Jews weren't treated differently than other minorities in these countries. But what Jews (and other minorities) faced in Arab/Muslim countries historically and during the 1930's was minor compared to what Jews faced in Europe during the 1930's and 40's. Most Muslims peacefully co-existed with their minorities. The problems between Jews and Muslims began soon after Zionists started their ethnical cleansing of Palestine of non-Jews.
You portray the exodus of Jews from Arab/Muslim countries as occuring at the same time as the Zionist ethnic cleansing of Palestine.
You also claim that Jews from Arab/Mulsim dominated countries faced ethnic cleansing. That's also incorrect. Jews living in Arab/Muslim countries faced increasing discrimination and harassment as a result of what Zionists were doing to Muslims in Palestine. I would agree that harassment and discrimination isn't right, but not getting a job or having vandals write things on your home is not the same thing as massacres of entire villages, rape, torture and murder. There are few cases of Jews being forcibly removed from their homes while its provable that hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were forcibly removed from their homes.
Selling your belongings and moving to Israel is called immigration, not ethnic cleansing.
Clearing an area of non-Jews by razing villages, shooting men, raping the women, and then beating and shooting the survivors as they flee for the border is definitely ethnic cleansing.
Nakba deniers aren't that different from holocaust deniers in my book.
Here is first person testimony of a survivor:
Now that's ethnic cleansing.
Ethnic cleansing of the Arab population of Palestine
"Joseph Weitz was the director of the Jewish National Land Fund...On December 19, 1940, he wrote: 'It must be clear that there is no room for both peoples in this country...The Zionist enterprise so far...has been fine and good in its own time, and could do with 'land buying' - but this will not bring about the State of Israel; that must come all at once, in the manner of a Salvation (this is the secret of the Messianic idea); and there is no way besides transferring the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer them all; except maybe for Bethlehem, Nazareth and Old Jerusalem, we must not leave a single village, not a single tribe'...There were literally hundreds of such statements made by Zionists." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."
Its not ethnic cleansing because it wasn't their land. That has been shown. They were workers living in company housing for pay. Thats no different than farm hands, you get fired from the job or it closes down or sells out, you move out.
You're talking nonsense. The Zionists readily admit that the Arabs had to go. That the Arabs had to be driven out of Palestine. It is well documented that the Arabs were driven from their homes and villages, and the homes and villages razed to the ground so they couldn't return. Who do you think filled the refugee camps? The Arabs lived in Palestine for a longer period than the Jews ever did and had as much right to live there.
1.) The Zionists don't amount to jack ship. There are Islamist groups that openly admit Israel needs to have every last man woman and child butchered in the name of Allah, does that mean every Palestinian needs to be tried for warcrimes? No, they are nuts. What a few crackpots say means nothing.
2.) They didn't own those homes. They were tenants and labourers. They lived there knowing they didn't own the homes. This is no different than many farmhands in America at the time, or workers living in company houses (Which you could only rent when you worked for the factory).
I don't doubt some owned the homes, war isn't fun, I don't doubt many more attempted to become squatters and engaged in violence. many more booked out planning to return and live in the house of Jewish people after the Arab armies slaughtered them, as many have admitted openly in previous years (then recanted mysteriously)
And to top this all off, few alive in Israel are responsible for any of this, and few palestinians left alive suffered from this. Tough nuggies, even if your horror stories were true, I don't see you moving back to the old country and giving your land to the local native council.
Demographics, 1920
In 1920 the majority of the approximately 750,000 people in this multi-ethnic region were Arabic-speaking Muslims, including a Bedouin population (estimated at 103,331 at the time of the 1922 census[42] and concentrated in the Beersheba area and the region south and east of it), as well as Jews (who comprised some 11% of the total) and smaller groups of Druze, Syrians, Sudanese, Circassians, Egyptians, Greeks, and Hejazi Arabs.
In 1922 the British undertook the first census of the mandate. The population was 752,048, comprising 589,177 Muslims, 83,790 Jews, 71,464 Christians and 7,617 persons belonging to other groups. After a second census in 1931, the population had grown to 1,036,339 in total, comprising 761,922 Muslims, 175,138 Jews, 89,134 Christians and 10,145 people belonging to other groups. There were no further censuses but statistics were maintained by counting births, deaths and migration. Some components such as illegal immigration could only be estimated approximately. The White Paper of 1939, which placed immigration restrictions on Jews, stated that the Jewish population "has risen to some 450,000" and was "approaching a third of the entire population of the country". In 1945 a demographic study showed that the population had grown to 1,764,520, comprising 1,061,270 Muslims, 553,600 Jews, 135,550 Christians and 14,100 people of other groups.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_of_Palestine#Population
As of 1931, the territory of the British Mandate of Palestine was 26,625,600 dunums, of which 8,252,900 dunums or 33% were cultivable.[44]Official statistics show that Jews privately and collectively owned 1,393,531 dunums of land in 1945.[45] Estimates of the total volume of land that Jews had acquired by May 15, 1948 are complicated by illegal and unregistered land transfers, as well as by the lack of data on land concessions from the Palestine administration after March 31, 1936.[46]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...ownership_of_the_British_Mandate_of_Palestine
...According to your new findings, how many cases of Israeli rape were there in 1948?
"About a dozen. In Acre four soldiers raped a girl and murdered her and her father. In Jaffa, soldiers of the Kiryati Brigade raped one girl and tried to rape several more. At Hunin, which is in the Galilee, two girls were raped and then murdered. There were one or two cases of rape at Tantura, south of Haifa. There was one case of rape at Qula, in the center of the country. At the village of Abu Shusha, near Kibbutz Gezer [in the Ramle area] there were four female prisoners, one of whom was raped a number of times. And there were other cases. Usually more than one soldier was involved. Usually there were one or two Palestinian girls. In a large proportion of the cases the event ended with murder. Because neither the victims nor the rapists liked to report these events, we have to assume that the dozen cases of rape that were reported, which I found, are not the whole story. They are just the tip of the iceberg."
According to your findings, how many acts of Israeli massacre were perpetrated in 1948?
"Twenty-four. In some cases four or five people were executed, in others the numbers were 70, 80, 100. There was also a great deal of arbitrary killing. Two old men are spotted walking in a field - they are shot. A woman is found in an abandoned village - she is shot. There are cases such as the village of Dawayima [in the Hebron region], in which a column entered the village with all guns blazing and killed anything that moved.
"The worst cases were Saliha (70-80 killed), Deir Yassin (100-110), Lod (250), Dawayima (hundreds) and perhaps Abu Shusha (70). There is no unequivocal proof of a large-scale massacre at Tantura, but war crimes were perpetrated there. At Jaffa there was a massacre about which nothing had been known until now. The same at Arab al Muwassi, in the north. About half of the acts of massacre were part of Operation Hiram [in the north, in October 1948]: at Safsaf, Saliha, Jish, Eilaboun, Arab al Muwasi, Deir al Asad, Majdal Krum, Sasa. In Operation Hiram there was a unusually high concentration of executions of people against a wall or next to a well in an orderly fashion.
"That can't be chance. It's a pattern. Apparently, various officers who took part in the operation understood that the expulsion order they received permitted them to do these deeds in order to encourage the population to take to the roads. The fact is that no one was punished for these acts of murder. Ben-Gurion silenced the matter. He covered up for the officers who did the massacres."
What you are telling me here, as though by the way, is that in Operation Hiram there was a comprehensive and explicit expulsion order. Is that right?
"Yes. One of the revelations in the book is that on October 31, 1948, the commander of the Northern Front, Moshe Carmel, issued an order in writing to his units to expedite the removal of the Arab population. Carmel took this action immediately after a visit by Ben-Gurion to the Northern Command in Nazareth. There is no doubt in my mind that this order originated with Ben-Gurion. Just as the expulsion order for the city of Lod, which was signed by Yitzhak Rabin, was issued immediately after Ben-Gurion visited the headquarters of Operation Dani [July 1948]."
http://www.counterpunch.org/shavit01162004.html
...In his preface, Pappe writes about the "Red House" in Tel-Aviv that became headquarters for the Hagana, the dominant Zionist underground paramilitary militia during the British Mandate period in Palestine between 1920 and 1948 when the Jewish state came into being. He details how David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, met with leading Zionists and young Jewish military officers on March 10, 1948 to finalize plans to ethnically cleanse Palestine that unfolded in the months that followed including "large-scale (deadly serious)intimidation; laying siege to and bombarding villages and population centres; setting fire to homes, properties and goods; expulsion; demolition; and finally, planting mines among the rubble to prevent any of the expelled inhabitants from returning."
The final master plan was called Plan D (Dalet in Hebrew) following plans A, B, and C preceding it. It was to be a war without mercy complying with what Ben-Gurion said in June, 1938 to the Jewish Agency Executive and never wavering from later: "I am for compulsory transfer; I do not see anything immoral in it." Plan D became the way to do it. It included forcible expulsion of hundreds of thousands of unwanted Palestinian Arabs in urban and rural areas accompanied by an unknown number of others mass slaughtered to get it done. The goal was simple and straightforward - to create an exclusive Jewish state without an Arab presence by any means including mass-murder.
Once begun, the whole ugly business took six months to complete. It expelled about 800,000 people, killed many others, and destroyed 531 villages and 11 urban neighborhoods in cities like Tel-Aviv, Haifa and Jerusalem. The action was a clear case of ethnic cleansing that international law today calls a crime against humanity for which convicted Nazis at Nuremberg were hanged. So far Israelis have always remained immune from international law even though names of guilty leaders and those charged with implementing their orders are known as well as the crimes they committed.
They included cold-blooded mass-murder; destruction of homes, villages and crops; rapes; other atrocities; and massacres of defenseless people given no quarter including women and children. The crimes were suppressed and expunged from official accounts as Israeli historiography cooked up the myth that Palestinians left voluntarily fearing harm from invading Arab armies. It was a lie covering up Israeli crimes Palestinians call the Nakba - the catastrophe or disaster that's still a cold, harsh festering unresolved injustice.
Even with British armed presence still in charge of law and order before its Mandate ended, Jewish forces completed the expulsion of about 250,000 Palestinians the Brits did nothing to stop. It continued unabated because when neighboring Arab states finally intervened, they did so without conviction. They came belatedly and with only small, ill-equipped forces, no match for a superior, well-armed Israeli military easily able to prevail as discussed below.
Ethnic Cleansing Defined
Pappe notes that ethnic cleansing is well-defined in international law that calls it a crime against humanity. He cites several definitions including from the Hutchinson encyclopedia saying it's expulsion by force to homogenize the population. The US State Department concurs adding its essence is to eradicate a region's history. The United Nations used a similar definition in 1993 when the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) characterized it as the desire of a state or regime to impose ethnic rule on a mixed area using expulsion and other violence including separating men and women, detentions, murder of males of all ages who might become combatants, destruction of houses, and repopulating areas with another ethnic group.
In 1948, Zionists waged their "War of Independence" using Plan D to "cleanse" Palestine according to the UN definition. It involved cold-blooded massacres and indiscriminate killing, targeted assassinations and widespread destruction as clear instances of crimes of war and against humanity, later expunged from the country's official history and erased from its collective memory...
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Stephen_Lendman/EthnicCleansing_IlanPappe.html
Israel/Occupied Territories: House Demolition/forced eviction
PUBLIC AI Index: MDE 15/029/2007
27 April 2007
UA 99/07 House Demolition/forced eviction
ISRAEL/
OCCUPIED TERRITORIES More than 100 residents of Hadidiya village
...For years Israel has pursued a policy of discriminatory house demolition, allowing scores of Israeli settlements, illegal under international law, to be built on occupied Palestinian land, while confiscating Palestinian lands, refusing building permits for Palestinians and destroying their homes. In particular, there has been relentless pressure from the Israeli army in the
West Bank on Palestinians from Bedouin groups to leave the areas where they have been accustomed to live and graze their flocks for decades. The reasons
given by the Israeli courts – e.g. lack of planning permission, land reserved
for agricultural use or land in a military zone – are used against Palestinians, while Israeli settlements continue to expand on Palestinian agricultural land. The land vacated has often been used for illegal settlements, such as the vast settlement of Maale Adumim near Jerusalem, which was built on land which was once used by Palestinian Bedouin.
Palestinians, including Palestinian Bedouin, in the Jordan Valley, much of
which is now a military area or taken over by some 36 Israeli settlements, have suffered particular pressure. Since May 2005 Palestinians whose identity
documents do not give the northern Jordan Valley as their place of residence
are not allowed to live in the Jordan Valley. House demolition has been widely used as a means to force the Palestinian population to leave the Jordan Valley; then, living elsewhere, the army will not allow such Palestinians to return. Families often receive house demolition orders written in Hebrew, a language which most Palestinians do not understand or read; sometimes these orders are not given to the families but simply left on the land. Families often only know of the order when the army arrives to demolish their homes...
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE150292007
WHO IS A PALESTINE REFUGEE?
"Under UNRWA's operational definition, Palestine refugees are persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. UNRWA's services are available to all those living in its area of operations who meet this definition, who are registered with the Agency and who need assistance. UNRWA's definition of a refugee also covers the descendants of persons who became refugees in 1948. The number of registered Palestine refugees has subsequently grown from 914,000 in 1950 to more than 4.4 million in 2005, and continues to rise due to natural population growth.![]()
http://www.un.org/unrwa/refugees/whois.html
Complete garbage! Save this kind of stuff for when you go to temple next Saturday.. BTW, there are thousands of Jewish families living in Palestinian houses.
Wrong again. The majority of Palestinians never owned the homes, they did live in them though. Perhaps if they hadn't tolerated living in a basically feudal society they would have a right to bemoan.
And no im not Jewish, sometimes people can see through whiney bollshoi and actually look at the base evidence, and not instead see what would make a better story. Sometimes there is no hero and no villain, and you have to stop rewriting history to make it so. Very rarely is there a good guy and a bad guy.
Was it cruel and heartless to evict labourers from homes, even if not their own homes and they had no right to them? Sure it was, while they may have chosen to put and their families in that situation they did as such because it was their best hope for a better life.
If I hire people to come work at logging camp and live their with their families on my land, it would be awful cold of me to just one day up and evict them all after often generations of them working for me just because someone offered to buy it from me or I decided I wanted to turn it into a golf course etc, but that is still my right. While not a good or just act, they are still not victims, they knew this could happen and chose the life anyways.
The true crimes are those who did own their homes (though few did, the area was largely barren in Israel compared to the rest of the region) who did lose them. But there is also know way to know who was unlawfully evicted (and by whom) and who took up arms out of uniform and thus legally lost their homes.
And like it or not, the descendants of both parties share neither guilt nor victimization for anything that happened.
Sorry Juan, history doesn't fold itself into neat little "Good guys/ Bad guys" headings, and if it seems to, you almost certainly know you are seeing a pile of bollshoi.
Juan
Zzrchov isn't about to give any material a fair hearing. His mind is made-up...settled...."there is clearly a right and a wrong involved here"....with Jews being absolutely right and Palestinians being absolutely wrong....
Why would our friend entertain the truth?
Why would our friend Z consider the possibility that a strongly held conviction he has ....is wrong?
Folk like to reduce issues to simple levels like "right" and "wrong", many believe that listening to any evidence, any opinion at odds with their personal perspective on ...anything....is tantamount to admitting defeat....
Tail chasing...
It's what's kept Israelis and Palestinians dying in droves...since that early mistake back in 47...
Must be nice to have it all figured our, eh, Juan? Since you are the moral authority on the subject mabey you could let us know what the solution is.
I wonder what the situation would be if the Jew stayed in the proposed Jewish areas and the Arabs stayed in the proposed Arab areas and there had been no Israeli war of independence, just independence for both peoples? Just imagine for a moment. Its kinda nice...... Now, reality.
Juan
Zzrchov isn't about to give any material a fair hearing. His mind is made-up...settled...."there is clearly a right and a wrong involved here"....with Jews being absolutely right and Palestinians being absolutely wrong....
Why would our friend entertain the truth?
Why would our friend Z consider the possibility that a strongly held conviction he has ....is wrong?
Folk like to reduce issues to simple levels like "right" and "wrong", many believe that listening to any evidence, any opinion at odds with their personal perspective on ...anything....is tantamount to admitting defeat....
Tail chasing...
It's what's kept Israelis and Palestinians dying in droves...since that early mistake back in 47...