UNRWA. It's like this...

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
The Supreme Leader whack job? The Iranian president's duties include the following, subject to supervision, policy guidance and approval by the supreme leader: Second in command (after the supreme leader) of the executive branch of government and chairperson of the cabinet. The deputy commander-in-chief of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army.

I don’t think the Iranian president has much choice, but to go along with the whack job.
This is phase two...create civil unrest.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
“The 7 October attack scarred souls,” said UN secretary general, António Guterres. “On this day, we remember all those who were brutally killed and suffered unspeakable violence – including sexual violence – as they were simply living their lives.”

Guterres said Monday was “a day for the global community to repeat in the loudest voice our utter condemnation of the abhorrent acts of Hamas, including the taking of hostages”, who must be released “immediately and unconditionally”.

He added that the “wave of shocking violence and bloodshed” that has since erupted “continues to shatter lives and inflict profound human suffering for Palestinians in Gaza, and now the people of Lebanon” and it was “time to stop the suffering”.

In the US, President Joe Biden condemned the “unspeakable brutality” of the attack, paid tribute to the people – including American citizens – killed and kidnapped and said he remained committed to Israel’s right to defend itself a year on.

“I believe that history will also remember 7 October as a dark day for the Palestinian people because of the conflict that Hamas unleashed that day,” Biden said, adding: “Far too many civilians have suffered far too much during this year of conflict.”

Vice-president Kamala Harris said she was “heartbroken over the scale of death and destruction in Gaza over the past year” and it was “far past time for a hostage and ceasefire deal to end the suffering of innocent people.” Etc…
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Pro-Palestinian events also took place in many countries, with hundreds gathering amid a heavy police presence at Sydney town hall to attend a vigil for Palestinian lives lost, and a rally in Pakistan’s largest city, Karachi, to protest against Israeli airstrikes.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,034
2,420
113
New Brunswick
Pro-Palestinian events also took place in many countries, with hundreds gathering amid a heavy police presence at Sydney town hall to attend a vigil for Palestinian lives lost, and a rally in Pakistan’s largest city, Karachi, to protest against Israeli airstrikes.

Good on those people.

It needs to be remembered that not only Israel was a victim of that day and not only Israel now has to deal with the trauma.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
Pro-Palestinian events also took place in many countries, with hundreds gathering amid a heavy police presence at Sydney town hall to attend a vigil for Palestinian lives lost, and a rally in Pakistan’s largest city, Karachi, to protest against Israeli airstrikes.

Actually, it was only Israel that day. The days after became more inclusive.
Prior if you get the full picture. Oct 7 came not because or Iran or Hezbollah or some other fucked up myth. It wasnt a surprise. It was building a long time.

It came because of Israeli State sponsored terrorism in the West Bank on Palestinians.

Period
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Prior if you get the full picture. Oct 7 came not because or Iran or Hezbollah or some other fucked up myth. It wasnt a surprise. It was building a long time.

It came because of Israeli State sponsored terrorism in the West Bank on Palestinians.

Period
…And the normalization of relations between Israel & Saudi Arabia, which wasn’t in the best interest of….some other Middle Eastern country that thrives on instability in other nations around it that aren’t predominantly Shiite.

Saudi Arabia isn’t predominantly Shiite. The Iranian militias in Saudi Arabia have been ineffective to date, so Iran & Saudi Arabia exactly buddies at this point.

Syria is isn’t predominantly Shiite so “militia’s” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

Lebanon isn’t predominantly Shiite (Muslims are about equally Shiite/Sunni there) so “militias” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

Yemen isn’t predominantly Shiite so “militias” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

Iraq happens to be a bit more Shiite than Sunni (more than half, but not overwhelmingly so), and thus “militias” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

The Gaza wing of Palestinians are not predominantly Shiite so “militias” & instability (sponsored by Iran). The West Bank wing of Palestinians aren’t predominantly Shiite either so….there is a pattern beyond “blame it on the Jews” though they do make a convenient focal point for the “which one of these is not like the others…which one of these is not the same” uniting of Shiites & Sunni’s until there aren’t Jews to single out.

Jews have not been Muslims since before there were Muslims, which is a long time.

The West Bank as an excuse has very little to do with those that consider themselves Palestinians, and everything to do with the fact that it was once Muslim land, so it must always remain Muslim land into perpetuity. Spain & India (parts of it) are a focal point for the future I’m going to assume, but that’s not the current story.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
…And the normalization of relations between Israel & Saudi Arabia, which wasn’t in the best interest of….some other Middle Eastern country that thrives on instability in other nations around it that aren’t predominantly Shiite.

Saudi Arabia isn’t predominantly Shiite. The Iranian militias in Saudi Arabia have been ineffective to date, so Iran & Saudi Arabia exactly buddies at this point.

Syria is isn’t predominantly Shiite so “militia’s” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

Lebanon isn’t predominantly Shiite (Muslims are about equally Shiite/Sunni there) so “militias” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

Yemen isn’t predominantly Shiite so “militias” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

Iraq happens to be a bit more Shiite than Sunni (more than half, but not overwhelmingly so), and thus “militias” & national instability (sponsored by Iran).

The Gaza wing of Palestinians are not predominantly Shiite so “militias” & instability (sponsored by Iran). The West Bank wing of Palestinians aren’t predominantly Shiite either so….there is a pattern beyond “blame it on the Jews” though they do make a convenient focal point for the “which one of these is not like the others…which one of these is not the same” uniting of Shiites & Sunni’s until there aren’t Jews to single out.

Jews have not been Muslims since before there were Muslims, which is a long time.

The West Bank as an excuse has very little to do with those that consider themselves Palestinians, and everything to do with the fact that it was once Muslim land, so it must always remain Muslim land into perpetuity. Spain & India (parts of it) are a focal point for the future I’m going to assume, but that’s not the current story.
Dont get lost in these those and them layers. Is there love between Sephardic and Ashkenzi and whats its impact on the price of rice in China?

OCCUPATION and now a Supremacist Govt in Israel with fucking nukes is NFG. At all for anyone. Would you hand a nuke to Arayan Nation?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Dont get lost in these those and them layers. Is there love between Sephardic and Ashkenzi and whats its impact on the price of rice in China?

OCCUPATION and now a Supremacist Govt in Israel with fucking nukes is NFG. At all for anyone. Would you hand a nuke to Arayan Nation?
I’m not handing a nuke to anybody, & the price of rice in China is about as relevant as the fate of the “Palestinians” to the rest of the Muslim world. They’re seat-warmers and that’s about it. The more “civilian casualties” in Gaza, the better the propaganda for Hamas & in turn Iran and its other proxies.

How many rockets & Missiles has Hamas lobbed into Egypt in the last year, & why? ‘Cuz the West Bank? Seriously? If the Jews were just another sect of Islam, would this even be newsworthy? Background newsworthy? Open Air Prison anyone?
1728354691573.jpeg
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
I’m not handing a nuke to anybody, & the price of rice in China is about as relevant as the fate of the “Palestinians” to the rest of the Muslim world. They’re seat-warmers and that’s about it. The more “civilian casualties” in Gaza, the better the propaganda for Hamas & in turn Iran and its other proxies.

How many rockets & Missiles has Hamas lobbed into Egypt in the last year, & why? ‘Cuz the West Bank? Seriously? If the Jews were just another sect of Islam, would this even be newsworthy? Background newsworthy? Open Air Prison anyone?
View attachment 25154
Because Israel has been taken over by nut job supremacists with nukes that even hate you. Thats the worst possible thing to happen to Israel and the middle east.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Over the past year, Israel has launched attacks on multiple countries and occupied territories: the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iran.

Yet countries and territories aside, Israel has also targeted one specific organization with a series of unprecedented rhetorical and violent attacks.

Yes, the United Nations. We have all witnessed Israel, effectively, declare war on the UN.
Consider the record of recent weeks and months:

Israel’s prime minister, while standing on stage at the UN general assembly, denounced the body as “contemptible”, a “house of darkness” and a “swamp of antisemitic bile”.

Israel’s outgoing ambassador to the UN shredded a copy of the UN charter with a miniature paper shredder while also standing at the podium of the general assembly, and later said the UN headquarters in New York “should be closed and wiped off the face of the Earth”.

Israel’s foreign minister falsely accused the UN secretary general of not having condemned Iran’s attacks on Israel, declared him “persona non grata in Israel” and announced that he had “banned him from entering the country”.

The Israeli government actively obstructed a UN-mandated commission of inquiry trying to collect evidence on the 7 October attacks.

Israel’s parliament is in the process of designating a longstanding UN agency, Unrwa, as a “terrorist organization”.

The Israeli military has bombed UN schools, warehouses and refugee camps in Gaza for 12 consecutive months, and killed a record 228 UN employees in the process. “By far the highest number of our personnel killed in a single conflict or natural disaster since the creation of the United Nations,” to quote the UN secretary general.
The Israeli military is now also attacking UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon. According to the UN, “five UN ‘Blue Helmets’ serving with UNIFIL in Lebanon have been injured as Israeli forces inflicted damage on UN positions close to the ‘Blue Line’.”

How is any of this OK? Acceptable? Legal?

Perhaps the biggest question of all: how is Israel still allowed to remain a member of the UN? Why has it not yet been expelled from an organization that it is relentlessly and shamelessly attacking and undermining? Sure, there are other human rights abusers that remain card-carrying members of the UN – Syria, Russia and North Korea, to name but a few – but none of them have killed UN employees en masse; none of them have sent tanks to invade a UN base; none of them have “refused to comply with more than two dozen UNSC resolutions”. It has been more than 60 years since any country in the world dared make the UN secretary general himself “persona non grata”.

To be clear: it’s not as if there isn’t a mechanism for expelling a UN member state. Article 6 of the UN charter says:

“A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

Now some might point out that no member state has ever been expelled from the UN under Article 6. Plus, the United States, which has vetoed over 50 UN security council resolutions critical of Israel since the early 1970s, would never allow such a “recommendation of the Security Council” to be made.

It’s a valid objection. History, however, teaches us that there are workarounds to security council vetoes. As the international law professor and former US state department adviser Thomas Grant pointed out in October 2022, while making his own case for expelling Russia from the United Nations in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, “UN members on two occasions in the past have judged a particular Member delegation no longer fit to sit at the organization’s table. On both occasions, the UN improvised a solution.”

In 1971, socialist and non-aligned nations in the Global South voted in the UN general assembly to recognized the People’s Republic of China as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations” and thereby replaced the representatives from the Republic of China (Taiwan), which had been a founding member of the UN. ROC was out, PRC was in – and it was the general assembly, not the security council, that decided it.

Three years later, relying again not on the UN charter but its own “rules of procedure” as the human rights lawyer and former UN official Saul Takahisi has noted, the UN general assembly “voted to refuse to recognize the credentials of the South African delegation” and “barred South Africa from participation in the Unga” until 1994.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
continued from above…

Oh, and the two main reasons cited by the UN general assembly for suspending South Africa’s membership? Its practice of apartheid against the indigenous Black population and its illegal occupation of neighboring Namibia. Sound familiar?

Crucially, as Thomas Grant has written, “the move against South Africa followed no precise procedural pathway in the UN charter or existing UN practice” and the UN showed how “an improvisatory ethos prevails, when the member states judge a matter important enough that they must act.”

So what is more “important” for the UN member states right now than attacks on the UN itself by a single member state? On the UN’s authority, personnel, headquarters and charter? On Saturday, 40 countries issued a joint statement condemning Israel’s brazen and ongoing assault on UN peacekeepers in Lebanon but talk is cheap. UN member states need to act.

The Israeli government may want to pretend that the United Nations, and the general assembly in particular, is irrelevant, impotent and filled with antisemitic bias, yet Israel only exists today because of a UN general assembly resolution. The country’s own 1948 Declaration of Independence makes seven different references to the United Nations, all of them super-positive and ever-so-grateful.

So evicting Israel from the UN, or at least suspending its participation in the general assembly as a first step, would send a powerful message – both to the people of Israel and to the rest of the world.

That the authority of the United Nations still matters. That the lives of UN staff and peacekeepers also matter. And that one rogue nation cannot declare war on the UN itself and continue to get away with it.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
Over the past year, Israel has launched attacks on multiple countries and occupied territories: the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iran.

Yet countries and territories aside, Israel has also targeted one specific organization with a series of unprecedented rhetorical and violent attacks.

Yes, the United Nations. We have all witnessed Israel, effectively, declare war on the UN.
Consider the record of recent weeks and months:

Israel’s prime minister, while standing on stage at the UN general assembly, denounced the body as “contemptible”, a “house of darkness” and a “swamp of antisemitic bile”.

Israel’s outgoing ambassador to the UN shredded a copy of the UN charter with a miniature paper shredder while also standing at the podium of the general assembly, and later said the UN headquarters in New York “should be closed and wiped off the face of the Earth”.

Israel’s foreign minister falsely accused the UN secretary general of not having condemned Iran’s attacks on Israel, declared him “persona non grata in Israel” and announced that he had “banned him from entering the country”.

The Israeli government actively obstructed a UN-mandated commission of inquiry trying to collect evidence on the 7 October attacks.

Israel’s parliament is in the process of designating a longstanding UN agency, Unrwa, as a “terrorist organization”.

The Israeli military has bombed UN schools, warehouses and refugee camps in Gaza for 12 consecutive months, and killed a record 228 UN employees in the process. “By far the highest number of our personnel killed in a single conflict or natural disaster since the creation of the United Nations,” to quote the UN secretary general.
The Israeli military is now also attacking UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon. According to the UN, “five UN ‘Blue Helmets’ serving with UNIFIL in Lebanon have been injured as Israeli forces inflicted damage on UN positions close to the ‘Blue Line’.”

How is any of this OK? Acceptable? Legal?

Perhaps the biggest question of all: how is Israel still allowed to remain a member of the UN? Why has it not yet been expelled from an organization that it is relentlessly and shamelessly attacking and undermining? Sure, there are other human rights abusers that remain card-carrying members of the UN – Syria, Russia and North Korea, to name but a few – but none of them have killed UN employees en masse; none of them have sent tanks to invade a UN base; none of them have “refused to comply with more than two dozen UNSC resolutions”. It has been more than 60 years since any country in the world dared make the UN secretary general himself “persona non grata”.

To be clear: it’s not as if there isn’t a mechanism for expelling a UN member state. Article 6 of the UN charter says:

“A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

Now some might point out that no member state has ever been expelled from the UN under Article 6. Plus, the United States, which has vetoed over 50 UN security council resolutions critical of Israel since the early 1970s, would never allow such a “recommendation of the Security Council” to be made.

It’s a valid objection. History, however, teaches us that there are workarounds to security council vetoes. As the international law professor and former US state department adviser Thomas Grant pointed out in October 2022, while making his own case for expelling Russia from the United Nations in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, “UN members on two occasions in the past have judged a particular Member delegation no longer fit to sit at the organization’s table. On both occasions, the UN improvised a solution.”

In 1971, socialist and non-aligned nations in the Global South voted in the UN general assembly to recognized the People’s Republic of China as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations” and thereby replaced the representatives from the Republic of China (Taiwan), which had been a founding member of the UN. ROC was out, PRC was in – and it was the general assembly, not the security council, that decided it.

Three years later, relying again not on the UN charter but its own “rules of procedure” as the human rights lawyer and former UN official Saul Takahisi has noted, the UN general assembly “voted to refuse to recognize the credentials of the South African delegation” and “barred South Africa from participation in the Unga” until 1994.
continued from above…

Oh, and the two main reasons cited by the UN general assembly for suspending South Africa’s membership? Its practice of apartheid against the indigenous Black population and its illegal occupation of neighboring Namibia. Sound familiar?

Crucially, as Thomas Grant has written, “the move against South Africa followed no precise procedural pathway in the UN charter or existing UN practice” and the UN showed how “an improvisatory ethos prevails, when the member states judge a matter important enough that they must act.”

So what is more “important” for the UN member states right now than attacks on the UN itself by a single member state? On the UN’s authority, personnel, headquarters and charter? On Saturday, 40 countries issued a joint statement condemning Israel’s brazen and ongoing assault on UN peacekeepers in Lebanon but talk is cheap. UN member states need to act.

The Israeli government may want to pretend that the United Nations, and the general assembly in particular, is irrelevant, impotent and filled with antisemitic bias, yet Israel only exists today because of a UN general assembly resolution. The country’s own 1948 Declaration of Independence makes seven different references to the United Nations, all of them super-positive and ever-so-grateful.

So evicting Israel from the UN, or at least suspending its participation in the general assembly as a first step, would send a powerful message – both to the people of Israel and to the rest of the world.

That the authority of the United Nations still matters. That the lives of UN staff and peacekeepers also matter. And that one rogue nation cannot declare war on the UN itself and continue to get away with it.
Hey hey hey. Adolf Netanyahu is a straight shooter with no guff.
 
Last edited:

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Israeli military is now also attacking UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon. According to the UN, “five UN ‘Blue Helmets’ serving with UNIFIL in Lebanon have been injured as Israeli forces inflicted damage on UN positions close to the ‘Blue Line’.”
1729429201569.jpeg
How could this tunnel, weapons cache, & firing position be constructed without UNIFIL knowledge? If Hezbollah put a tiny flag on a pole at that tunnel entrance, UNFIL could spend their time trying to drive golf balls into it from this UNFULFILLED compound.
1729429721621.jpeg
Since 1978, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has been tasked with maintaining peace along the Israel-Lebanon border. However, UNIFIL’s mandate to monitor and prevent hostilities has been systematically undermined by its own inability — or unwillingness — to act against Hezbollah’s growing military presence.
Over those years, Hezbollah has entrenched itself in southern Lebanon, right under UNIFIL’s watch, preparing for an assault on Israel that could have had devastating consequences. Despite clear violations of UN Security Council Resolutions 1559 and 1701, which call for the disarmament of Hezbollah and forbid any armed presence south of the Litani River, UNIFIL has failed to enforce these mandates.
Just two weeks ago, I spoke with a young woman in Israel whose family was displaced by Hezbollah. Her family, part of a rooted Christian community in South Lebanon, had lived in the region for generations. They were taken in by Israel after being driven out by Hezbollah during the group’s consolidation of control.

The family had been aligned with the South Lebanon Army, a militia battling Hezbollah, but was forced to flee as the terror organization overran their homeland. Their displacement allowed Hezbollah to set up its extensive terror network, aimed squarely at Israel, while UNIFIL turned a blind eye.

The most glaring example of this failure is Hezbollah’s extensive military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have recently uncovered hundreds of Hezbollah weapons caches, tunnel shafts and underground command centres just metres from the Israeli border. Near the town of Metula, IDF troops were shocked by the vast amount of sophisticated military equipment and supplies they discovered, including vehicles armed with heavy machine-guns, gas, combat uniforms and medical kits. The IDF even uncovered an 800-metre underground base serving as a command centre for Hezbollah’s elite Radwan force, whose primary objective is to launch an invasion of Israel.
Despite UN Resolution 1701, which demands that Hezbollah withdraw its forces north of the Litani River, the Radwan Force remains deployed along the Blue Line—the border monitored by United Nations peacekeepers—conducting surveillance and gathering intelligence on northern Israel.
The unit has been involved in the fighting since October 7, 2023, and is expected to lead any future Hezbollah incursions into Israel.

This isn’t just a defensive measure — Hezbollah was actively preparing for war. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah had openly boasted about “conquering the Galilee,” and given the strength and resources of Hezbollah, such an attack could have been far more devastating than the recent Hamas-led assault on Israel on October 7, 2023. Within a single square kilometre, IDF forces found roughly 100 Hezbollah sites, including tunnels, weapons storage, and supplies for a prolonged conflict. Many of these munitions were newly manufactured, some as recently as the previous year, showing that Hezbollah’s buildup is both recent and unchecked.

The most troubling aspect is that all of this happened under UNIFIL’s nose. How could such an extensive network of tunnels, military bases and weapons caches be constructed without their knowledge? The answer is painfully clear: they are complicit. The international peacekeeping force, tasked with ensuring security, had given Hezbollah cover to operate with impunity. Instead of confronting Hezbollah’s violations, UNIFIL has stood by while the group continued to fortify its military infrastructure.

This is part of a broader trend among UN agencies when it comes to Israel. It’s not just UNIFIL that has turned a blind eye — UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, has also allowed terrorist organizations to exploit its facilities. UNRWA’s central headquarters housed a Hamas server centre in its basement, its schools were used as weapons depots, and some of its staff participated in the October 7 massacre. Across the UN system, agencies and international courts have been weaponized against Israel, selectively applying international law while ignoring the terrorism and violence aimed at the Jewish state.

Hezbollah’s buildup is not only a violation of UN mandates but also a direct threat to regional stability. UN Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon recently highlighted how Hezbollah terrorists have used UNIFIL outposts as hiding places and ambush sites. In one recent incident, Hezbollah fired anti-tank missiles at Israeli troops near a UNIFIL base. An Israeli tank, caught in the crossfire and attempting to evacuate casualties, accidentally backed into the UNIFIL post, damaging the main gate. IDF international spokesperson Nadav Shoshani clarified that this was not a deliberate act, but rather a desperate effort to protect their soldiers under heavy fire.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…
Hey hey hey. Adolf Netanyahu is a straight shooter with no guff.
…has called on UN Secretary-General António Guterres to remove UNIFIL forces from Hezbollah strongholds. “We regret the harm to UNIFIL soldiers, and we are doing our utmost to prevent such harm,” Netanyahu said. “But the simplest and most obvious way to ensure this is simply to withdraw them from the danger zone.”
1729433927132.jpeg
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu again called Monday for the peacekeepers in southern Lebanon to move from certain areas near the Israeli border, while dismissing as “completely false” claims that Israeli forces targeted the UN force known as UNIFIL.

The reality is that Hezbollah’s extensive military preparations and tunnel networks could have been stopped years ago if UNIFIL had done its job.
But instead of enforcing peace, UNIFIL has allowed Hezbollah to grow into a formidable military force, ready to launch a devastating attack on Israel. The international community must act now. UNIFIL has proven ineffective, and its presence in southern Lebanon has only emboldened Hezbollah.
If the UN does not take decisive action to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure and remove UNIFIL from the danger zone, the consequences will be disastrous — not only for Israel — but for the entire region. There can be no more looking the other way.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
View attachment 25287
How could this tunnel, weapons cache, & firing position be constructed without UNIFIL knowledge? If Hezbollah put a tiny flag on a pole at that tunnel entrance, UNFIL could spend their time trying to drive golf balls into it from this UNFULFILLED compound.
View attachment 25288
Since 1978, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has been tasked with maintaining peace along the Israel-Lebanon border. However, UNIFIL’s mandate to monitor and prevent hostilities has been systematically undermined by its own inability — or unwillingness — to act against Hezbollah’s growing military presence.
Over those years, Hezbollah has entrenched itself in southern Lebanon, right under UNIFIL’s watch, preparing for an assault on Israel that could have had devastating consequences. Despite clear violations of UN Security Council Resolutions 1559 and 1701, which call for the disarmament of Hezbollah and forbid any armed presence south of the Litani River, UNIFIL has failed to enforce these mandates.
Just two weeks ago, I spoke with a young woman in Israel whose family was displaced by Hezbollah. Her family, part of a rooted Christian community in South Lebanon, had lived in the region for generations. They were taken in by Israel after being driven out by Hezbollah during the group’s consolidation of control.

The family had been aligned with the South Lebanon Army, a militia battling Hezbollah, but was forced to flee as the terror organization overran their homeland. Their displacement allowed Hezbollah to set up its extensive terror network, aimed squarely at Israel, while UNIFIL turned a blind eye.

The most glaring example of this failure is Hezbollah’s extensive military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have recently uncovered hundreds of Hezbollah weapons caches, tunnel shafts and underground command centres just metres from the Israeli border. Near the town of Metula, IDF troops were shocked by the vast amount of sophisticated military equipment and supplies they discovered, including vehicles armed with heavy machine-guns, gas, combat uniforms and medical kits. The IDF even uncovered an 800-metre underground base serving as a command centre for Hezbollah’s elite Radwan force, whose primary objective is to launch an invasion of Israel.
Despite UN Resolution 1701, which demands that Hezbollah withdraw its forces north of the Litani River, the Radwan Force remains deployed along the Blue Line—the border monitored by United Nations peacekeepers—conducting surveillance and gathering intelligence on northern Israel.
The unit has been involved in the fighting since October 7, 2023, and is expected to lead any future Hezbollah incursions into Israel.

This isn’t just a defensive measure — Hezbollah was actively preparing for war. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah had openly boasted about “conquering the Galilee,” and given the strength and resources of Hezbollah, such an attack could have been far more devastating than the recent Hamas-led assault on Israel on October 7, 2023. Within a single square kilometre, IDF forces found roughly 100 Hezbollah sites, including tunnels, weapons storage, and supplies for a prolonged conflict. Many of these munitions were newly manufactured, some as recently as the previous year, showing that Hezbollah’s buildup is both recent and unchecked.

The most troubling aspect is that all of this happened under UNIFIL’s nose. How could such an extensive network of tunnels, military bases and weapons caches be constructed without their knowledge? The answer is painfully clear: they are complicit. The international peacekeeping force, tasked with ensuring security, had given Hezbollah cover to operate with impunity. Instead of confronting Hezbollah’s violations, UNIFIL has stood by while the group continued to fortify its military infrastructure.

This is part of a broader trend among UN agencies when it comes to Israel. It’s not just UNIFIL that has turned a blind eye — UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, has also allowed terrorist organizations to exploit its facilities. UNRWA’s central headquarters housed a Hamas server centre in its basement, its schools were used as weapons depots, and some of its staff participated in the October 7 massacre. Across the UN system, agencies and international courts have been weaponized against Israel, selectively applying international law while ignoring the terrorism and violence aimed at the Jewish state.

Hezbollah’s buildup is not only a violation of UN mandates but also a direct threat to regional stability. UN Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon recently highlighted how Hezbollah terrorists have used UNIFIL outposts as hiding places and ambush sites. In one recent incident, Hezbollah fired anti-tank missiles at Israeli troops near a UNIFIL base. An Israeli tank, caught in the crossfire and attempting to evacuate casualties, accidentally backed into the UNIFIL post, damaging the main gate. IDF international spokesperson Nadav Shoshani clarified that this was not a deliberate act, but rather a desperate effort to protect their soldiers under heavy fire.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…

…has called on UN Secretary-General António Guterres to remove UNIFIL forces from Hezbollah strongholds. “We regret the harm to UNIFIL soldiers, and we are doing our utmost to prevent such harm,” Netanyahu said. “But the simplest and most obvious way to ensure this is simply to withdraw them from the danger zone.”
View attachment 25289
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu again called Monday for the peacekeepers in southern Lebanon to move from certain areas near the Israeli border, while dismissing as “completely false” claims that Israeli forces targeted the UN force known as UNIFIL.

The reality is that Hezbollah’s extensive military preparations and tunnel networks could have been stopped years ago if UNIFIL had done its job.
But instead of enforcing peace, UNIFIL has allowed Hezbollah to grow into a formidable military force, ready to launch a devastating attack on Israel. The international community must act now. UNIFIL has proven ineffective, and its presence in southern Lebanon has only emboldened Hezbollah.
If the UN does not take decisive action to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure and remove UNIFIL from the danger zone, the consequences will be disastrous — not only for Israel — but for the entire region. There can be no more looking the other way.
Why should they act against Hezbollah? Are they hostile against the UN?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,273
9,617
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Why should they act against Hezbollah? Are they hostile against the UN?
You mean the U.N. &/or UNIFIL? Why should they act against Hezbollah on behalf of….oh, let’s say Lebanon and its stability which is their mission for the last 45+ years you mean? Resolutions 1701 & 425 & 426? No reason I guess.

UNIFIL (Arabic: يونيفيل, Hebrew: יוניפי״ל), is a United Nations peacekeeping mission established on 19 March 1978 by United Nations Security Council Resolutions 425and 426, and several further resolutions in 2006 to confirm Hezbollah demilitarisation, support Lebanese army operations against insurgents and weapon smuggling, and confirming Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, in order to ensure that the government of Lebanon would restore its effective authority in the area.
The 1978 South Lebanon conflict, also known as the First Israeli invasion of Lebanon and codenamed Operation Litani by Israel, began when Israel invaded southern Lebanon up to the Litani River in March 1978. It was in response to the Coastal Road massacre near Tel Aviv by Palestinian militants based in Lebanon.
1729451581749.jpeg