Uh-oh...
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
please member petros! If you have nothing subject matter related to add to this thread, why do you insist on continuing to derail it? Again, are you the self-professed, self-proclaimed, "King Of The Thread Derailers"?
in other threads, yes - several times now! Within this thread I've opted not to perpetuate/encourage your perpetual thread derailing routine. By the by, why won't you answer my repeated challenges put to you (in appropriate threads) over your "Holocene Optimum" nonsense?
Climate changes all the time it is not due to anything but change itself
all the crap we have been handed is that crap. Now I do think we should
be kind to our environment on a personal level but really this alarm and
scare tactic is just that and yes its a tax and a retool of industry at our
expense we are suckers for a lot of things including this one
all the crap we have been handed is that crap. Now I do think we should
be kind to our environment on a personal level but really this alarm and
scare tactic is just that and yes its a tax and a retool of industry at our
expense we are suckers for a lot of things including this one
no - climate doesn't just magically/mystically change "on its own"! Many factors can cause changes in Earth’s energy balance... in turn causing the Earth's climate to change... many factors, anthropogenic or natural, like greenhouse effect changes, sun energy variations reaching Earth, changes in the Earth's albedo, etc.. C'mon... change happens cause... change happens??? Really, that's what you're going with here? :mrgreen:
these "radiative forcing" changes in the energy budget/balance can either heat or cool the Earth... again, in this case, shyte just doesn't happen on its own!
special graphic for member taxi's graphic presentation phobia:
it is certainly your prerogative to continue with your nothingness posts. C'mon taxi... reach a bit... if you claim what I posted is "more crap", than put up something other than your standard drive-by drivel. Sure you can!
Posts moved to here.
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/wreck-beach/133279-rail-against-derails.html
Keep it up and they'll get deleted.
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/wreck-beach/133279-rail-against-derails.html
Keep it up and they'll get deleted.
no - climate doesn't just magically/mystically change "on its own"! Many factors can cause changes in Earth’s energy balance... in turn causing the Earth's climate to change... many factors, anthropogenic or natural, like greenhouse effect changes, sun energy variations reaching Earth, changes in the Earth's albedo, etc.. C'mon... change happens cause... change happens??? Really, that's what you're going with here? :mrgreen:
these "radiative forcing" changes in the energy budget/balance can either heat or cool the Earth... again, in this case, shyte just doesn't happen on its own!
special graphic for member taxi's graphic presentation phobia:
it is certainly your prerogative to continue with your nothingness posts. C'mon taxi... reach a bit... if you claim what I posted is "more crap", than put up something other than your standard drive-by drivel. Sure you can!
Your drivel isn't worth any more time than that.
ya ya, just another taxi drive-by. Clearly, your "runaway, runaway" routine can be easily drawn out by simply challenging you to support your statements/claims! Runaway, runaway taxi!
skookie, taxi, gerryh, DuhSleeper... why won't any of you CC Deniers comment on the OP subject itself or take on my post? You've sure had a number of unrelated posts in this thread otherwise...
here let me help ya further: the issue the smallish number of models have is that the duration of time step for calculated insolation results in mean insolation varying with longitude. Again, this issue doesn't exist within the majority of models, particularly the more profiled and utilized models.... and, again, the issue for this smallish number of models has no/minimal impact on global temperature... something the paper authors acknowledge within the paper.
here let me help ya further: the issue the smallish number of models have is that the duration of time step for calculated insolation results in mean insolation varying with longitude. Again, this issue doesn't exist within the majority of models, particularly the more profiled and utilized models.... and, again, the issue for this smallish number of models has no/minimal impact on global temperature... something the paper authors acknowledge within the paper.
of course, once the details come forward it's understood that the authors found the issue in 8 of ~30 of the models... but that even within the 8, the resulting affect "averages out" to be a non-factor. None of the more profiled CMIP5 models have the issue. More pointedly, the paper itself states the issue doesn't have any impact on global temperature estimations. The issue reflects upon localized regional scales. But hey now member "skookumchuck" since you put your motor-mouth on mega-flap, are you aware of any CMIP5 models acting as localized regional "weather models"? :mrgreen: