U.S. soldiers seeking refugee status in Canada

McCaulley

Electoral Member
Mar 23, 2008
102
0
16
Pennsylvania
This guy voluntered, and so he must stick with it until it is done. He's made a commitment, if he wants to back down, it shows me a lot about what this guy is made of. i'm kinda glad he left our country, i don't want those kinda people defending my country
 

McCaulley

Electoral Member
Mar 23, 2008
102
0
16
Pennsylvania
I believe we treat our soldiers with the honor and reverence they deserve. It when they dont treat their contracts with honor when we disown them
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Okay, so, now here's where I show off how little I know... lol... individuals being brought to international courts for war crimes, because they did what their country said to do, from within the military they had to serve... how do charges ever stick if they HAVE to do what they are told? Or is it only the top brass being brought up on war crimes?

Well that is a slippery slope indeed. They are brought to International Courts because they lost. I assure you...if we were ever conquered you would see a lot of our leaders in front of these same courts. People say Bush should be brought in front of the world court. Who is going to come get him? The leaders of China after the Tiennamen Square Massacre should have been brought in front of the world court. Who is going to get them?

Who was brought in front to trial after WWII. Japanese and Germans...why?...they lost...plain and simple.

EDIT: But sometimes soldiers and Marines act on their own accord and do nasty things. No order was given to those prison guards to do those things and they were punished. Soldiers and Marines who just killed for no reason purposefully or act negligently aren't acting on the orders of the General. Those guys are punished too. But if you think the US Military is going to hand over soldiers at a checkpoint for hosing down a car that didn't stop to a Italian Kangaroo Court...forget it.
 
Last edited:

McCaulley

Electoral Member
Mar 23, 2008
102
0
16
Pennsylvania
plus it was mainly their high-ranking officers and commanders of POW camps that were tried, lower ranking soldiers were following orders
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
... i don't want those kinda people defending my country

If they want to live in my country, and they've signed up to protect it they cant quit. Hell, im in favor of bringing back the draft

I think you might want to give the issue some serious thought and figure out which of these statements is really your opinion. Do you or do you not want them serving?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
That's an awful way to put it!! Did you read what I posted about Cynicism today?

That is why I don't always respond to the Mikey's on CanCon.

At least Prax, Wolf and Juan (lately ;-)) has a brain and has ability to reason and debate with only a little sarcasm and minimal insults. Others in here have absolute ZERO ability to reason and look at things objectively or from another person's point of view. Eternal pessimist should also be added to it.
 

McCaulley

Electoral Member
Mar 23, 2008
102
0
16
Pennsylvania
Im am trying to say that i think that the men of our country, every one of them, even if they dont want to, have a responsibility, and debt, to serve our country, and if they have to, die for our country. They should not be able to reap the benefits without feeling the sacrifice. Does that clear it up for you
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I think you might want to give the issue some serious thought and figure out which of these statements is really your opinion. Do you or do you not want them serving?

Laughing... BUT...I think you missed his point. I think he is just adding that you just can't quit. There is a place for those that try to and are caught. It is called the brig. That is where these people belong. As soon as you get them back to us they can serve out their sentences and live their lives as best they can with a Dishonorable or Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD). While scrolling through the articles one soldier stood by his beliefs and got seven years and a BCD. That is going to stick like glue wherever he goes to apply for a job.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
While scrolling through the articles one soldier stood by his beliefs and got seven years and a BCD. That is going to stick like glue wherever he goes to apply for a job.

Okay, so here's the other issue that has come up in the discussion.... they should just take what's coming to them, be men about it. But some of these men have families. So, to just 'man up' and destroy any future potential for a career, is that really a wiser option? Does that really make them stronger and more honorable?
 

McCaulley

Electoral Member
Mar 23, 2008
102
0
16
Pennsylvania
Well, maybe they should have thought of the consequences of their actions before they deserted, maybe they should have grown themselves a pair before they decided to quit and run away from defending these very same families of theirs.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Laughing... BUT...I think you missed his point. I think he is just adding that you just can't quit.

I know what he was saying Eagle, except that the addition of the 'fine, you take them, we don't want them anyway.' is a form of insulting the country they fled to, and it's an emotional lash out over their decision. In times of war, lashing out emotionally is highly counterproductive, and ends in people running off to other countries to hide.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
That is why I don't always respond to the Mikey's on CanCon.

The only reason I commented was because I was the one who said he was a Cynic... not a cynic, but a Cynic, from one of the first schools of philosophical thought. I even followed it up with an article on Cynicism. But I don't think he saw that. :smile:
 

McCaulley

Electoral Member
Mar 23, 2008
102
0
16
Pennsylvania
im sorry if you took that as an insult to your country, i was just refering to the people who seemed overjoyed that he had quit the United States military forces, i meant that they could have him
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I do not think it is the right place to bring this up either but that is what has been brought up in here as an excuse for a deserter who defected to Canada.

It's related, it's how we see it, I sorta brought the topic to existence here, I think it relates.... and considdering it's your troops coming into our country, it does indeed relate and matter, since most here in this country can clearly understand why they would make a decision such as they did. Not that that's a stab at your country in paticular in regards to general Canadian's viewpoints (Anti-American if you will) I am sure if people here in Canada were in a war they all greatly opposed, they would flee our country to somewhere else.... such as your own. But if they did that, I wouldn't be PO'd at them.... that's their decision to make.

To me, it's a touchy balance..... your principles towards protecting your country and it's objectives, or principles towards your current family and plans for the future.

The Administration decided to go to war whether you agree with it or not. Congress approved. So regardless of what other nations of the world said the US did it. Again, that will be debated and argued over forever. I personally think we pulled the trigger too fast but now that we are there we have to see it through.

During the course of this war soldiers, Marines, etc have to conduct themselves properly. When they are called to go to Iraq, they must go. When they get there they must fight or do whatever their job requires. So when Marines and soldiers do nasty things just to do nasty things they get punished.

Individual soldiers cannot not decide for themselves that this is illegal no matter how many support groups or drums are pounded out in front of the White House. No matter how many countries come out in protest...they're Americans...they volunteered...they signed a contract...and made a decision for themselves that they are not going. Now they are listed as deserters.

That didn't seem to answer the question.... or is there no real answer?

So even if the entire country, or the majority of the country opposes this war, which depending on which articles or reports you read state true.... then that still doesn't matter and the President and Congress still get to do whatever the hell they wish, even if it goes against the majority of the country's wishes, and even though it is their children and parents going off to be killed for their personal agendas?

Sounds pretty friggin sick if you ask me. More Communist then Democratic, but that's JMO.
 
Last edited:

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Fashioning honor out of corruption and failure seems to be a distinctly American passtime.

As an accused cynic, can someone please help me out with the issue of where common sense and integrity, personal responsibility and accountability to fundamental human morality falls?

Because we made a mistake and slaughtered more people than Saddam Hussein ever killed...we have to do the honorable thing and keep our fists firmly wrapped around the petroleum pipelines....

And so because of some "agreement" some "contract" made between young men and a lying corrupt political system....the onus is on the individual to surrender his or her life in the name of lies and deceit.

Great argument.

Ding ding... another angle of what I was explaining but better. The government can break rules and laws, commit illegal acts and yet... it's the soldiers and families who suffer from their action..... great country.