U.S. Calls for 256% Tariff on Steel From China

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Corrosion-resistant steel imports from China were sold at unfairly low prices and will be taxed at 256 percent, according to a preliminary finding of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

“We’re concerned that the dumping that’s occurring is at higher levels than these determinations reflect,” Tim Brightbill, a partner at Wiley Rein LLP, a law firm representing U.S. steelmaker Nucor Corp., said Tuesday in an interview. “We have serious concerns that these preliminary duties are not enough at a time when unfairly priced imports continue to surge into the U.S. market at unprecedented rates.”

U.S. producers including Nucor, U.S. Steel Corp. and Steel Dynamics Inc. filed cases in June alleging that some products from China, India, Italy, South Korea and Taiwan had been dumped in the U.S., harming domestic companies. In November, the government found that all those countries, except Taiwan, subsidized their domestic production by as much as 236 percent of its price.

U.S. steelmakers have filed three sets of cases against imports of hot-rolled, cold-rolled and corrosion-resistant steel after deliveries from abroad surged. The price of hot-rolled steel coil, the benchmark product, is down about 40 percent this year, with domestic mills idling as much as 38 percent of capacity after imports climbed by 38 percent in 2014.

Imports of all steel products through October rose 3.9 percent in 2015. The Commerce Department estimated that the value of imports of anti-corrosive steel -- coils of the metal which have been coated with zinc or other treatments to prevent rust -- from the target countries to be $2.16 billion.

U.S. Calls for 256% Tariff on Imports of Steel From China - Bloomberg Business
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Poor America. Always looking and willing to f*ck someone else but God forbid they get a taste of it. Then they cry like a bunch of 4 year olds.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It didn't say the local plants were going to pick up the slack so it could be that production will also be down that same amount in the coming year.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
You have to wonder at raw materials being shipped overseas and processed there, then dumped back on these shores cheaper than steel can be produced here. It can't ALL be union scale scourge
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Perhaps the owners of the machines insist on taking 10% for themselves, off the top, or the wheels don't turn.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
You have to wonder at raw materials being shipped overseas and processed there, then dumped back on these shores cheaper than steel can be produced here. It can't ALL be union scale scourge

Only part of the problem. Taxation by multiple levels of government is another third. EXpensive and unnecessary environmental regulations are the third anchor pulling industry in North America underwater. No different than what happened to the sawmilling capacity on the west coast.

The triple corrosion protection bolts we get for rock stabilization in the tunnel project I am working on come from Norway. Apparently there is no North American producer.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
After the stunt we pulled to fu€k China's plans to use their own currency to buy Russian oil. This is just a small kick back. It's all out economic war being waged in the world right now. There is no more mister nice guy now. I wouldn't be surprised if they start intentionally poisoning their products with arsenic soon, if it's not already done.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
Take a look at the Rust Belts and abandoned steel mills in Pennsylvania, upstate New York, Ohio, Indiana and West Virginia.. and you'll realize this should have been done decades ago. And the reasoning should not have been on the basis of 'fairness'.. but simple economic survival. And i am not sure 256% is enough to reboot the industry. And it will need to be a permanent feature, enough to guarantee long term investment and viability in the industry.
 
Last edited:

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Good idea, they make junk.

Seriously, just rejected about $100,000 worth of Chinese stainless, ordered for Adalaide centre in Tdot.

It wasn't even 316, it was 304 for crying out loud. And they couldn't even get that cheap crap right. Delamination, voids. Complete junk.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Go's to show. Over there, the government don't spend money on their population. They subsidize corporations to the max.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
That would depend if that was an example of their best products or we got shipped the product that was rejected by the buyer who was willing to pay top dollar. The design of the building could make use of locally available products and that would eliminate imports and chasing a warranty that may or may not exist.
In the triple corrosion protection how do you verify that the two extra coats were applied without examining the same bolt 50 years later? How much extra for the 2 extra dips??
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Good idea, they make junk.

Seriously, just rejected about $100,000 worth of Chinese stainless, ordered for Adalaide centre in Tdot.

It wasn't even 316, it was 304 for crying out loud. And they couldn't even get that cheap crap right. Delamination, voids. Complete junk.

Why blame the Chinese? Who was the purchase agent?
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Good idea, they make junk.

Seriously, just rejected about $100,000 worth of Chinese stainless, ordered for Adalaide centre in Tdot.

It wasn't even 316, it was 304 for crying out loud. And they couldn't even get that cheap crap right. Delamination, voids. Complete junk.

The number indicates the quality in what sense?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Why blame the Chinese?
Because they make an inferior product.

Perhaps the steel was from Japan and mislabeled.
Geezus you're an idiot.

The number indicates the quality in what sense?
304 is more susceptible to corrosion, since it contains 18% chromium, and 8% nickel. While 316L is far less susceptible and contains 16% chromium, 10% nickel and 2% molybdenum. 304 is harder than 316, but only marginally so.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Geezus you're an idiot.
You are the one taking humor as being serious and skipping over the first part that indicated perhaps Canada ordered the cheap stuff and that is the only issue. Or do you really believe that China is that bad at making all products? Because that would clearly make you the idiot in the room, as always.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You are the one taking humor as being serious and skipping over the first part that indicated perhaps Canada ordered the cheap stuff and that is the only issue.
Geezus you're an idiot.

Or do you really believe that China is that bad at making all products?
I know for a fact that they make sh@tty stainless and elevator motors.

Because that would clearly make you the idiot in the room, as always.
But given absolutely stupid you are, your opinion is irrelevant.