Lol, how often are people who self declare that they are winning actually winning anything?
CHARLIE SHEEN - WINNING - YouTube
TWU law school snub
- Thread starter gerryh
- Start date
Lol, how often are people who self declare that they are winning actually winning anything?
CHARLIE SHEEN - WINNING - YouTube
Lol, the rules affect gay people differently than straight people. Treating people differently based on an attribute is the definition of discrimination.
So treating someone differently on the attribute they have a sexual predilection for 7 year old boys would be discrimination. Good to know where you stand.
Argument Clinic - John Cleese and Michael Palin - Monty Python - English Close Captioning - YouTube
How's comparing gays to bestiality fans going?
What about comparing gays to gay pedophiles? Then its just an issue of age. ;-)
Of course, do you know what the word discriminate means?
Not all discrimination is bad. I can discriminate between right and wrong. I can discriminate between males and females in terms of who is allowed into which bathroom.
In the U.S., sex segregation in bathrooms is illegal. Just one of those funny legal quirks.
Don't forget the gender-neutral bathrooms. :lol:
Transgendered students get gender-neutral washrooms at University of Victoria | National Post
Why am I not surprised you don't believe an American lawyer would know US law? You're such a f*cking idiot!
Lol, you continue to show that you have zero comprehension of basic legal concepts.
You continue to show zero concept of anything other than your personal opinion. Putting "lol" in front of all your responses just makes you look arrogant as well as ignorant. What you really need to learn and understand is that this is not the universe according BR. Most of us live in the real world under the rule of law and those laws do not always coincide with personal beliefs or opinions. I personally think that TWU should respect same-sex marriage because it is legal in Canada but what is also legal is their right not to respect it. What I consider a worse perversion is a group of lawyers not respecting the law. The precedent has been set by the SCOC that professional associations cannot blacklist a school or its graduates on any basis outside the law. Frankly having lawyers disregard this ruling leads me to believe we really do need a new law school that holds a higher standard of self-control and personal integrity. It would be an added bonus if getting this would also make your brain explode.
My comments about your understanding of the law come from numerous comments that demonstrate that.
"Lol, really? Where? That couldn't be a federal law could it?"
"Why am I not surprised you don't believe an American lawyer would know US law? You're such a f*cking idiot!"
That really seems to show that you have no clue that there are both state laws and federal laws. Me saying "that couldn't be a federal law, could it" in no way means that that isn't a law. I am asking where exactly that law applies.
You repeatedly make false statements about the Charter and various human rights codes.
You repeatedly state that it is somehow immoral and wrong to challenge something that you don't think is right. You think that a ruling about a similar case, but with very different jurisdictional issues, forms an iron clad new law that should never be challenged.
You repeatedly misstate what the SCOC decision was even about. In one post you are saying that they determined that TWU doesn't discriminate(that was never an issue before the court), you now claim "The precedent has been set by the SCOC that professional associations cannot blacklist a school or its graduates on any basis outside the law", also in no way what they said.
You keep trying to argue about if the school breaks the human rights code in BC or not, and think that that is the question at hand, even though nobody other than you has made that the subject of discussion.
The issue is about the right of the law society to make this choice.