Usually does every spring.........troll
Usually does every spring.........troll
Always a caveat.Climate scientists are convinced that global warming is, at least to a large extent, attributable to human activity.
What is the percentage of climate change is attributed to humans ? Exactly what is the percentage of the large part of climate change attributed to humans ? I await your scientifically and reproducible reply .The caveat being the truth.
Hong Kong has a 100% carbon tax and it's economy is doing just fine. We Whites could learn something from it.
Wasn't it you who went over there and complained about the choking pollution there? HK is not a model we should follow.
Much of Hong Kong's pollution does not come from Hong Kong itself. Consider its population density too. On a per capita basis, Hong Kong pollutes far less than Canada does.
Just like most if not all of the CO2 that gets put in the atmosphere does not come from Canada. So whatever these tax/money grabs are, they are not designed to help the environment because even if they cause decrease in carbon use, they will not make any significant impact on the environment.
Proof .
Money grab? Hong Kong has a lower overall tax rate than Canada does. Are you saying you'd rather pay more taxes overall just to avoid a carbon tax?
Money grab? Hong Kong has a lower overall tax rate than Canada does. Are you saying you'd rather pay more taxes overall just to avoid a carbon tax?
No. I am saying a carbon tax is useless and just a money grab for the government imposing it.
It's not.
The revenue actually goes toward lowering emissions or reducing other taxes.
A) Costs dropping do NOT necessarily translate into a savings for the consumer.I haven't visited any jail recently myself, so what do I know.
But don't forget that while wages might drop, so would costs even more. We always seem to forget that part of the equation.
Bullshyte!It's not.
The revenue actually goes toward lowering emissions or reducing other taxes.
Personally, I prefer taxes that I can avoid in principle. I have at least some control over how much carbon I consume, but no control over earning an income. In that way, does shifting from income to carbon tax not give consumers more choice while also making the tax more user-pay?