Sounds like the liberals and GST . Nope no politician in Canada ever campaigned one way and governed another .
Trump won’t pursue case against Clinton
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
back up a post or two
you missed something that negates your whole day
don't worry about it too much though
you look good in braids
Back away from campaign promises??????????? Grab a f**king brain. He has at least four years to honour any promises....................starting January 20. What a Hoosier!
We should start a thread and list all the people he has and is disappointing.
1. Fiscal conservatives
2. Throw Hillary in jail crowd
3. Wall construction companies
4. Mexican haters.
5. Climate change deniers
6. Kick out all the Muslims crowd
Who am I missing.
Hyperbole is so unbecoming.
Her supporters might care, Loc. In which case this is a good move by Trump and might soothe a few feathers. It gets him of the hook but leaves Hilary in the hands of the AG.............could be a win- win.
Hillary has virtually no supporters. 60% of Americans voted. Donald and Hillary split that vote and most people that voted, picked the least unpalatable person. Trump and Clinton both had, at best 15% support of the American voting population. Trump doesn't care about those 15%...why should he
Last edited:
Anyone who has the slightest inkling about simple Arithmetic would know they each had support of 30% of the population give or take one percent.........................but we're not all geniuses here!
There must be at least 20 of us who have told him the same thing, but apparently it's just not penetrating!
certainly descibes you
mr hitler the lefty, the party of slavery, and as bill clinton said, making america great again...
and your lil cucky socky poo too
One thing that we have learned about Donald Trump, both from his last two years on the campaign trail and from the Trump of earlier decades, is that it takes a real Gullibilly to believe anything that comes out of his mouth.
Trump used to say all manner of mainly liberal things on issues such as women's rights and such. That was before he chose to infiltrate the GOP. Then he promised his faithful dupes all manner of radical initiatives including a 2,000 mile wall along the Mexican border, the deportation of 12-million Mexican and Central American illegal immigrants, stealing the oil of the Middle East, "bombing the **** out of" ISIS, prison for abortion, on and on and on. Oh yeah, and jailing Hillary.
Less than a week after losing the vote by a significant margin but nonetheless winning the election, Trump is reneging on all those promises that drew the horde of Gullibillies to his side. He is, we're told, going to kill off the TPP but, aside from that, most of the rest was a rich diet of horse**** he fed to the dupes.
Does that mean Trump has been self-neutralized? Has he cut off his own cojones? Much as I would like to believe that I can't. That's because he's a pathological liar, willing to say whatever suits his personal interests from one day to the next.
So don't be sucked in by the kinder, gentler Trump. This is one guy you can never take at his word.
Trump flip-flops 6 times in 1-hour NYT interview
During the 2012 presidential election, Trump called the Electoral College “a disaster for a democracy” and said it had made “a laughingstock out of our nation.”
But after he defeated Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College while losing the popular vote, Trump tweeted that the Electoral College is “actually genius” because it “brings all states, including the smaller ones, into play.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-flip-flops-6-times-in-1-hour-nyt-interview-203417722.html
Trump used to say all manner of mainly liberal things on issues such as women's rights and such. That was before he chose to infiltrate the GOP. Then he promised his faithful dupes all manner of radical initiatives including a 2,000 mile wall along the Mexican border, the deportation of 12-million Mexican and Central American illegal immigrants, stealing the oil of the Middle East, "bombing the **** out of" ISIS, prison for abortion, on and on and on. Oh yeah, and jailing Hillary.
Less than a week after losing the vote by a significant margin but nonetheless winning the election, Trump is reneging on all those promises that drew the horde of Gullibillies to his side. He is, we're told, going to kill off the TPP but, aside from that, most of the rest was a rich diet of horse**** he fed to the dupes.
Does that mean Trump has been self-neutralized? Has he cut off his own cojones? Much as I would like to believe that I can't. That's because he's a pathological liar, willing to say whatever suits his personal interests from one day to the next.
So don't be sucked in by the kinder, gentler Trump. This is one guy you can never take at his word.
Trump flip-flops 6 times in 1-hour NYT interview
During the 2012 presidential election, Trump called the Electoral College “a disaster for a democracy” and said it had made “a laughingstock out of our nation.”
But after he defeated Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College while losing the popular vote, Trump tweeted that the Electoral College is “actually genius” because it “brings all states, including the smaller ones, into play.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-flip-flops-6-times-in-1-hour-nyt-interview-203417722.html
I can't believe there are people stupid enough to swallow that
Anybody who has the slightest inking knows that voting against one candidate does not equal support for the other. But you are right. You clearly are not a genius
But I do. We gonna meet up when I'm down in Phoenix? I'll by you a beer
rhetoric is rhetorical
u.s. election rhetoric
https://www.google.ca/search?espv=2...1j0i13i5i30k1j0i8i13i30k1j30i10k1.XwLJGDbaits
hyperbole is hyperbolic
u.s. election hyperbole
https://www.google.ca/search?espv=2......1c.1.64.serp..0.1.66...30i10k1.MNzFVGQwQYI
u.s. election rhetoric
https://www.google.ca/search?espv=2...1j0i13i5i30k1j0i8i13i30k1j30i10k1.XwLJGDbaits
hyperbole is hyperbolic
u.s. election hyperbole
https://www.google.ca/search?espv=2......1c.1.64.serp..0.1.66...30i10k1.MNzFVGQwQYI
'Promises' and threats made in the heat of a compaign battle.. do not constitute an obligation.. simply a proposal dependent on a given set circumstances and contitions in the future. In total they are intended to give the voter a sense of the political philosophy that would govern a candidate's administration.
So yes, i knew he wouldn't build a wall, deport 11 million illegals, prosecute Hillary but supported him because he represented a revolutionary change for the better from the disastrous NeoCon doctrine that has been foisted on America (and the world) by both parties since the early 70s. I knew he'd tear up TPP; rewrite or rescind Nafta; nominate socially conservative USSC justices; and will likely pull out of the Paris Climate Accord.
Preferences involve as sense of proportion and priority.
Last edited:
He was walking a thin line with this prosecution treats. He pushed it as far as he could, but if the Clinton's had wanted to play and hire lawyers (and they would have gotten lawyers lining-ups) it would have made for interesting court TV. It's too bad they didn't do it; CNN would have kept their ratings and we would have been kept entertained ) I would have don't it, just to Rudi cry.
) I would have don't it, just to Rudi cry.