Trump suggests revoking journalists’ credentials for reporting negative news about hi

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Free speech rally organized in protest.

Oh wait, that would never happen lol


Trump suggests revoking journalists’ credentials for reporting negative news about him

In his latest volley against the news media, U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday suggested that reporters have their credentials revoked for reporting negative news about him, calling such reporting “fake.”

In a tweet, Mr. Trump complained that “despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else,” most of the network news about him is “negative (Fake).”

“Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt?” Mr. Trump went on to ask, adding: “Take away credentials?”

Reporters require credentials to gain access the White House grounds and cover the President’s official and re-election campaign events.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders, however, insisted the administration is “very committed to a free press” and demonstrates that commitment through near-daily media briefings and access to the President.

“The fact that I’m standing here taking questions, the fact that the President took questions from your colleagues just two hours ago demonstrates this White House’s commitment to accessibility, and to providing information to the American public,” she said. “At the same time, the press has a responsibility to put out accurate information.”

Since the early days of his candidacy, Mr. Trump has railed against the media, going as far as to call reporters “the enemy of the people.” He has also mused about changing libel laws to make it easier to sue reporters for inaccurate stories (though he has no such authority) and has blamed reporters for his low approval ratings.

During his campaign, Mr. Trump also barred reporters from certain news organizations, including The Washington Post and the Des Moines Register, from covering his rallies and news conferences in a move that was widely condemned by advocates for a free press.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/wor...voking-journalists-credentials-for-reporting/
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Well MF, you should have nothing to worry about...
:)
what you post isn't even news.

It's all just coup attempt propaganda.

POLITICS
Media bias continues: 90% of Trump coverage in last three months has been negative, study says

The new study of major broadcast coverage reveals that 90 percent of statements made by reporters and nonpartisan sources the last three months on ABC, NBC and CBS evening newscasts about Mr. Trump and his administration were negative.

It’s all in the numbers. The analysts found 1,123 out of 1,228 statements made about the president on the “Big Three” news networks during September, October and November were critical of Mr. Trump. Only 105 of the statements were considered positive in tone or content.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/12/media-bias-continues-90-of-trump-coverage-in-last-/


I know I know...liebarrels hate facts...they interfere with nazicommieglobalist coup.

Study: News Coverage Of Trump More Negative Than For Other Presidents
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/02/5550...trump-more-negative-than-for-other-presidents

Study: 91 percent of recent network Trump coverage has been negative
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...egative/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.71dda4497927

Covering up for global genocide crooks is NOT news bub...it's COLLUSION.
;)
Hang man is coming...hard
...and he hates you " normal" people haters.

It's obvious that you are a semi pro propagandist, but this is an insignificant forum compared to the readership in the big leagues....so the real propagandists aren't confident in you yet.
:)
don't give up!
 
Last edited:

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Yes, I see you avoided the sources for those links...
:)
lol they aren't missing...YOU are!

I see you can't rationalize that simply identifying a proportion of negative news doesn't actually discredit it.

Nevermind the obvious paradox of lending credibility to the same media you to want to discredit.

But you know....