They don't?
No they don't. If one was to accept your goofy logic, the Liberal Party of Canada (the ones that gave us the Charter of Rights and Freedoms) would be authoritative simply because they brought in the war measures Act
They don't?
I think you meant "authoritarian." And yes, liberal parties are entirely capable of being authoritarian.No they don't. If one was to accept your goofy logic, the Liberal Party of Canada (the ones that gave us the Charter of Rights and Freedoms) would be authoritative simply because they brought in the war measures Act
It seems there are a fair amount of people world wide that are united in their dislike for trump.
Can't say it was or wasn't trumps intent.
I think you meant "authoritarian." And yes, liberal parties are entirely capable of being authoritarian.
Sort of like school, when you think back on it, it was the teachers you hated the most then are the ones you respect the most now because they did you the most good.
Yeah, I know what you mean. The two I hated most were the gym teacher, who eventually lost his job when the district finally had to admit that he was porking the middle school girls (they would sit in his lap at lunch time; other gym teachers REFUSED to go on road trips with him and any girls' team), and the math teacher who would get drunk at lunch and punched a kid in the face one afternoon.
Yep, they were the 'best'. In a Trump-lover's world, I guess.
Maybe Canada didn't but the U.S. did. I know, you approve of everything FDR did, but the simple fact is he extended the power of the Federal government more than any other president in history.
He also banned Jewish refugees because they "might be Nazi spies." And imprisoned American citizens of Japanese descent without charges or trial. So the Used-Car-Salesman-in-Chief has pretty good precedents.
The standard of living is going up and there is less violence than we've ever had.
But not "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," which is the Constitutional standard for impeachment.Because it's unconstitutional.
But not "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," which is the Constitutional standard for impeachment.
Why don't you shut your piehole about things you know the square root of sweet f***-all about?
You usually aren't this stupid. Bad day?So, Bill Clinton was guilty of all of that above for fiddling about with the young female help at the White House? Aren't those offenses subject to both broad interpretation and angry mobs with pitck forks?
You usually aren't this stupid. Bad day?