Trump adds $1 TRILLION in DEBT (with pitifully insignificant economic growth)
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
And this could be only the beginning. He created the situation with his tariffs and now prepared to spend megabucks helping those so seriously affected by HIS policy. What did he expect other nations would do?? Just roll over for the US??.....Not for HIM. Trade warts are good.......says the idiot. A very primitive method of doing things.
The question is how long are the Trumptards prepared to support these devastating.......and self destructive policies ...........?? Trump is too calcified and stubborn to reconsider even with blatant facts in front of him. How much are the Trumptards prepared to "sacrifice " for their dotard leader??
Notice that Trump never talks about the national debt....only his unrealistic and grandiose plans.
So the math is $1T for the arms industry + $1T for the interest alone on the National Debt (Rothschild World Bank) and it is a few people running away from a place that is 'dangerous' (because the CIA turned it into a Black Market Pharmacy) that is going to be blamed for the downfall of America, the not so great of a place.
Nope Trump is cut from Denim, Trudeau from gingham!
Well, Nixon WAS an asshole!
$12 Billion a spit in a bucket and it will pay back in spades just to stave off pressure until Trump gets the U.S. trade imbalances closer to even, especially with China,
Trump Administration Plans $12 Billion In Farm Aid To Offset Tariffs
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/24/6319...-provide-farmers-12-billion-to-offset-tariffs
Rural belt voted for Trump on the grounds that they oppose collectivism but when their profits go downward, they always go hat-in-hat to the feds. Thus, no surprise that they are taking this handout.
Let's have forum right wingers condemn this welfarism.
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/24/6319...-provide-farmers-12-billion-to-offset-tariffs
Rural belt voted for Trump on the grounds that they oppose collectivism but when their profits go downward, they always go hat-in-hat to the feds. Thus, no surprise that they are taking this handout.
Let's have forum right wingers condemn this welfarism.
Sorry...he does not . If he did have a thick skin.....he would not react so angrily via twitter to what he sees as insult's to him or his pride etc.He is far to over reactive , and revenge motivated for someone that should be able to handle these things with some degree of panache. He can't headland any form of criticism without having a twitter meltdown. Or do something like this.
Trump might revoke security clearances of former officials who criticized him
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/talalansari/trump-revoke-security-clearance
that is NOT thick skinned at all. That is petulant , easily insulted and vengeful...not to mention childish.
Last edited:
