Trudeau supports doctor assisted suicide ruling for personal reasons

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
If that is their choice then yes. That is the whole point of the SCC ruling, your body...your choice. It's called freedom, you should look into it sometime.



The Dr doesn't have to do anything. There is no requirement for a physician to participate or even provide the means for the patient to do it themselves.

Sounds to me like you support forced suffering. What business is it of yours anyway who lives or dies and when and how they die. As long as nobody is trying to induce your death you shouldn't worry.


Does Freedom trump the long term well being of the individual?
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
Pure BS from our little twit of a PM. He's lying again, and drenching himself in saccharine pathos as is his wont.

Pain is, in fact, extremely manageable at our level of medical technology. Most of us have had relatives or friends who've died of cancer or other wasting illness and know this. The 'intolerability' of pain is a recent phenomenon in our society.. at a time when modern science is most able to relieve it.

It corresponds directly to the loss of any sense of a supernatural quality or meaning to life, EXCEPT, in the avoidance of pain. The promotion of euthenasia, abortion, homosexuality, reflected in a catastrophically diminished fertility rate, are all symptomatic of a society in a profound crisis of faith.

It is no accident that this issue presented itself when the birthrate has fallen below replacement levels. With ever fewer young people to keep our economy vital and support an aging population.. the old and the infirm suddenly become intolerable burdens.

We've had end of life issues for 2000 years in our civilization... we've muddled through. In fact, in more hopeful times, we viewed final suffering as a saving grace, from which divine reconciliation and redemption are forged.

It's only when our society became steeped in pessismism, futility and morbidity.. .. in atheism as the state sponsored ideology.. did it suddenly become an obligation of the government to aid and abet suicide. It's the product of a very sick counter credo.

But's that's all beyond the little dimwit. I think its really pathetic of Justin to drag his father into this.. and assume that Pierre, who had the vestiges of a Catholic faith at the time of his death, would choose this cowardly and soul destroying option. Justin simply mustered him in posthumously to support a political position. He's really quite unconscionable.
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
If that is their choice then yes. That is the whole point of the SCC ruling, your body...your choice. It's called freedom, you should look into it sometime.


I absolutely agree with you Nick, and I think the main criteria should be that the patient is irreparably ill!
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
If that is their choice then yes. That is the whole point of the SCC ruling, your body...your choice. It's called freedom, you should look into it sometime.


Take a look at the Netherlands or Belgium as to where this 'freedom' is leading.

Palliative care has all but disappeared as has medical research into prolonging life, leaving terminally ill no options of dignified care. Government insurance corporations refuse to compensate end of life medicine... leaving the ill with no options but to incur ruinous medical expenses.

In Belgium children can be euthenised if their 'caregiver' deems them to lack 'quality of life'. At least 10%, but likely far more, of patients euthenised in the Netherlands in fact have never given their permission.. they are simply murdered out of convenience.. or some trumped up 'living will' attested to by some relative who stands to benefit from the death. It has become common now for patients to submit a will to a notary of lawyer prohibiting euthenasia.. to prevent their being murdered in hospital

This has nothing to do with freedom. You are perfectly free to take your own life in our society. That's always been the case. Obliging that state to do it for you is another thing entirely.
 
Last edited:

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
Does Freedom trump the long term well being of the individual?

If it is the freedom of that same individual, then yes. It is their life and death for better or worse. Their decision.

This has nothing to do with freedom. You are perfectly free to take your own life in our society. That's always been the case. Obliging that state to do it for you is another thing entirely.

The state doesnt have to do it. This would allow for others to assist. Doesnt have to be the state. If a person wants to die and someone else is willing to help - fine.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Some of the provisions in this bill seem to be the kind of things pro-lifers want to put into abortion legislation to obstruct access. Since this is about life/death and bodily autonomy it seems like the reasons why the supreme court struck down abortion legislation would apply here.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Does Freedom trump the long term well being of the individual?

Absolutely. These are people with incurable or terminal diseases anyway, there is no long term wellbeing. Under the charter even a healthy individual has a lawful right to end their own life so the only issue here really is the legality of helping.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Absolutely. These are people with incurable or terminal diseases anyway, there is no long term wellbeing. Under the charter even a healthy individual has a lawful right to end their own life so the only issue here really is the legality of helping.


About 40 years ago Richard Bloch of H & R Bloch was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer and given months to live, but he said Nah and went to Texas for treatment after which he was cured and lived another 20 or 30 years, so I'm skeptical about these "terminal" diagnoses. I think assisted suicide is good for People in old age whose organs are all shutting down.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bloch
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Absolutely, as long as you kill 2 or 3 bureaucraps first! :)
I wouldn't kill a fly.

Every little soul terminated by yer ego weighs heavy onya. There's that constilation.

I know this Thai cook that does really good junebugs thier back, better than popcorn. Hundreds of kilos of them fly into your sauce pans for a few weeks, every year, after them come the grasshoppers, the nightcrawlers are firstbthough, yummmy
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,367
2,953
113
Toronto, ON
About 40 years ago Richard Bloch of H & R Bloch was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer and given months to live, but he said Nah and went to Texas for treatment after which he was cured and lived another 20 or 30 years, so I'm skeptical about these "terminal" diagnoses. I think assisted suicide is good for People in old age whose organs are all shutting down.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bloch

Why should it not have been his choice? Like who are YOU to decide if somebody chooses to end THEIR life?

Good point! But I think you have to give most patients the benefit of the doubt......................at least until the ravens start moving in!


Again, why can't the patient be the one to decide?