Trudeau Liberals say 'no' to Canadian oil and gas independence

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,629
14,362
113
Low Earth Orbit
Hooray for trade deficts killing GDP and mediocrity!

With the Kinder Morgan pipeline hanging by a thread, the federal Liberals had a chance on the weekend to express support for Alberta and the national economy.

They didn’t.

The party’s annual convention in Halifax voted against a resolution to make “Canadian oil and gas independence” an official policy.

The resolution came from the party’s Alberta section. It was eminently reasonable and responsible. But it wasn’t good enough to become Liberal doctrine.

The winning resolutions focused on a guaranteed minimum income, decriminalization of consensual sex work and the sex trade, pharmacare, a Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights, and a good deal more.

But the idea that Canadian oil and natural gas should fill all of Canada’s needs for oil and natural gas? Not a chance.

That would mean new pipelines to the east, through vote-rich Ontario and Quebec, and on to the Atlantic. Liberal territory, every inch of the way.

With an election due next year, that applecart would not be upset.

Party officials point out that the resolution went through several hoops before being included in a list of 30, and then 20 resolutions up for consideration. It did have some support from members.

But the Alberta plan didn’t make the list of 15 official policies of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s governing party.

Now, governments don’t always pay that much attention to the policies their party members adopt.

But they pay none at all to policies their members do not adopt. Oil and gas independence is a dead idea in Liberal Canada.

I asked for comment on this vote from two Alberta Liberal MPs, Calgary’s Kent Hehr and Amarjeet Sohi of Edmonton, the infrastructure minister.

There was no response Monday.

The Notley government didn’t comment either. You can understand that — with the pipeline at such a crucial stage, there’s no point in annoying the uneasy allies in Ottawa.

United Conservative Party leader Jason Kenney, however, was not reticent.

“Not surprised this wasn’t a priority for the Liberals,” Kenney wrote on Twitter. “After all, Justin Trudeau killed Energy East, the pipeline that would’ve brought Western Canadian oil to the rest of the country.”

It is now fixed policy that this country will keep buying oil from crooked and environmentally lax regimes, in preference to western Canadian oil. Hundreds of tankers from overseas and the U.S. will continue to ply the Atlantic Coast and the St. Lawrence.

Of all the many weird things about Canada, strangest of all is the anti-tanker opposition to pipelines on the West Coast, and the pro-tanker rejection of pipelines in the East.

In rational terms — which is to say, not Canadian terms — it’s hard to see how any government could reject this resolution.

It said, in part:

Canada imported roughly 759,000 barrels and 736,000 barrels of oil per day, in 2016 and 2015 respectively, despite Canada having among the largest oil and gas reserves in the world, capable of meeting all Canadian oil and gas needs;
Canadian oil and gas independence would allow Canada to ensure that domestic natural resource extraction and usage would be carried out more efficiently, safely, and sustainably than in countries which export oil and gas to Canada.
The resolution itself asked the government to:

Implement a strategy for oil and gas independence, with particular attention to: strong environmental and safety regulations, and oversight of the oil and gas sector; national job creation and economic growth; and, respect for the rights and interests of Indigenous peoples.
Consult with all provinces, territories, First Nations, Metis, Inuit, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and all other relevant stakeholders in developing acceptable infrastructure and pipelines necessary for oil and gas independence.
The Liberals’ answer to all that is “No.” Their clear policy is to build no tidewater pipeline but Kinder Morgan. And they wonder why so many people feel they aren’t even serious about that.

Don Braid’s column appears regularly in the Herald

dbraid@postmedia.com

Twitter: @DonBraid
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,554
8,150
113
B.C.
Just goes to show that Canada is a united country sea to shiny sea . Or should that read lake to shiny sea .
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
They pour $4.5 billion into an Alberta bailout - but that isn't enough.

They want more.

**** oil
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
They pour $4.5 billion into an Alberta bailout - but that isn't enough.

They want more.

**** oil

Alberta has never needed a bailout. What it need is the Feds to stay the **** out of the way and quit "helping". TrudOWE is only interested in the tax revenue he can skim off to give to other countries.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
They pour $4.5 billion into an Alberta bailout - but that isn't enough.

They want more.

**** oil

It's closer to a $12 BILLion dollar expenditure


Alberta has never needed a bailout. What it need is the Feds to stay the **** out of the way and quit "helping". TrudOWE is only interested in the tax revenue he can skim off to give to other countries.

You're totally correct.

All that was needed was for the Feds to man-up and enforce the laws in letting construction start and lay down the law to Burnaby and YVR that their make-believe enviro position and hysterics are worthless
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
They pour $4.5 billion into an Alberta bailout - but that isn't enough.

They want more.

**** oil
You're such a loser even oil wouldn't let you f*ck it.

And to sum up the Libtards' view, it's in the national interest to sell our oil to China, but it's NOT in the national interests to become energy independent.
Really makes ya wonder just whose national interests the Libtards are working for.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I wonder if someone could gives us some details on how we become "energy independent"

does it involve secret handshakes and tiki torch rallies?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
PM Harper's Cancun speech was pretty clear that the Canadian Government would tale directions from Big Biz and Big Oil as to what bills were passed and which were not. I'm quite sure Big Oil likes the deal they have in Canada where they keep the lion's share of the money they make so that is why no changes would be made.

Try to relate what happened in Iran when they nationalized the oil industry, same as Hugo in Venezuela, soon as he did that it was unending economic warfare by the World bankers using their favorite puppet, the USofA. .

I wonder if someone could gives us some details on how we become "energy independent"

does it involve secret handshakes and tiki torch rallies?
Ir requires we send a lot of our money out of the country every year and the operation is open ended so no matter the moves made they are never enough. Perhaps if we cancelled winter for the next 50 years we might make some headway.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Would there be a carbon tax on foreign oil?

I wonder if the American will allow Canada to be energy independent:

"Divert any of the oil flowing south into the US and we'll consider it as a strategic threat. We will then seize your oilfields to protect American supplies. Have a nice day, Justin."
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
This should be no surprise that Justin Trudeau is a lackey for the International Trading and Financial Cartels. The sovereign, moral, nation state.. with an integrated national industrial economy and energy self sufficiency.. is their arch enemy.

That's why they are so supportive of an effeminate, pussy whipped little flap jack of quisling like Justin. He doesn't believe there is a Canada.. just a colonial victimizer of first nations, women, homosexuals and ethnic minorities. And he views himself as 'citizen of the world'.. not a Canadian. He's above all that.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
I wonder if someone could gives us some details on how we become "energy independent"

does it involve secret handshakes and tiki torch rallies?


Really? This basic premise baffles you?


I wonder if the American will allow Canada to be energy independent:

"Divert any of the oil flowing south into the US and we'll consider it as a strategic threat. We will then seize your oilfields to protect American supplies. Have a nice day, Justin."


This your quote?
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
I wonder if someone could gives us some details on how we become "energy independent"

does it involve secret handshakes and tiki torch rallies?
Oh fer chure mang. Then they gather together for a rousing rendition of Horst Wessel Lied and a human sacrifice to the oil god, Petra Oleum.

F'kin idiot.