trudeau crossed the floor and pushed aside NDP MPs

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Go back to banging nails. This is obviously WAY over your head.

:). Rather be banging My wife;)

Give me a argument !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Prove me wrong Gerryh, your my only hope!

and I see you are a homophobe. That would be the only thing that would explain why you would use these statements as a "put down" or in a negative connotation. You and your buddy's up there string up any "faggots" lately?

Those homos deserved it, right Nick? Beating homos is perfectly justifiable .
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,367
2,953
113
Toronto, ON
IF, he was breaking the "law", then that would have been a fairly simple thing to remedy. Instead, the NDP chose to be childish about it. No laws were broken. Limiting debate is a "legal" parliamentary procedure used by many in the past, both Liberal and Conservative. Do try and get a grip.

Opposition shenanigans are also part of the game (all parties) that has been played in the past. The difference here is the PM decided to do his own seating to avoid the opposition shenanigans. It kind of blew up on him.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Opposition shenanigans are also part of the game (all parties) that has been played in the past. The difference here is the PM decided to do his own seating to avoid the opposition shenanigans. It kind of blew up on him.


Well, it "blew up" with some, not with all. From where I am sitting, the NDP came out with the short end of the stick with the cons being inconsequential.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
My guess is you have a man-crush on Justin and want have prolonged homosexual relations with him. Face it, you are a closet Liberal. You couldn't get any more rabid in your support of his actions. Tell the truth now....you really want to suck his d*ck don't you?

I guess it's perfectly justifiable to use gay's as a insult based on the fact they are gay.

I can see how that in your victim blaming mind that makes perfect sense :lol:

Boy are you in over your head :lol:

Well, it "blew up" with some, not with all. From where I am sitting, the NDP came out with the short end of the stick with the cons being inconsequential.

Can you please give me the argument I asked for Gerryh. , :lol: I'll admit if I'm wrong you know I will.

Just because it's too shocking and in bad taste is not a logical argument that proves what I said wrong :lol:
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
I guess it's perfectly justifiable to use gay's as a insult based on the fact they are gay.
I'm just trying to help you come to terms with your latent homosexual love for Justin. It is okay to admit it. We all accept homosexuality these days, you don't have to hide anymore.
I can see how that in your victim blaming mind that makes perfect sense :lol:
You still see JT as the victim and not the instigator. Until you comprehend your mistake in that assumption you have zero credibility and look even more stupid than usual.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
I'm just trying to help you come to terms with your latent homosexual love for Justin. It is okay to admit it. We all accept homosexuality these days, you don't have to hide anymore.

You still see JT as the victim and not the instigator. Until you comprehend your mistake in that assumption you have zero credibility and look even more stupid than usual.


Your basically arguing two wrongs make a right ;)
Two wrongs don't make a right politicalNick :lol:
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Can you please give me the argument I asked for Gerryh. , :lol: I'll admit if I'm wrong you know I will.

Just because it's too shocking and in bad taste is not a logical argument that proves what I said wrong :lol:


Like I said, over your head. Go back to banging nails.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,367
2,953
113
Toronto, ON
Well, it "blew up" with some, not with all. From where I am sitting, the NDP came out with the short end of the stick with the cons being inconsequential.


I think the NDP reaction was clearly over-dramatic. And it really didn't change my opinion of Trudeau (but that was never positive to start with so it really couldn't get worse). But the reaction off the Liberal supporters on this board makes me think it may have done some 'damage' -- at least planted a seed -- to the PM's image. The fact we are still talking about it tends to back that up in my books as well.

And you are correct about the Conservatives. From my standpoint the Conservatives are not involved at all in the shenanigans at all.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
From my standpoint the Conservatives are not involved at all in the shenanigans at all.

nope. buddy didn't soccer-hold his arm and cringe with pain...it's all overblown and would be a non issue if justin had known his role and stayed put. poor kid. I'm sure butts is schooling him during their japan trip though.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Give me the smoking gun that proves me wrong Gerryh. I'm ready for it. Let me have it :lol:
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I'm calling you on your bluff Gerryh. ;)


What "bluff"? I've already stated that your comparison is "wrong". Using rape as a comparison to what happened here is beyond the pale. There is no comparison between the 2. People that use this type of comparison do so ONLY to get people to agree with them because disagreeing would mean supporting rape. It is small minded, ignorant, brainless twats that try to use this comparison in an "argument" that they don't have a clue about.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
The only way to gauge any damage from this is to look at the aggregate of polls over the next month.

It likely won't have any impact.

It's not a real issue like robocalls or bribing the senate.

You know.

Things that people with no moral compass whatsoever (conbots) do.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Your basically arguing two wrongs make a right ;)
Two wrongs don't make a right politicalNick :lol:

No, I'm arguing that Justine was wrong in trying to bypass constitutional requirements and parliamentary procedure and then not following the rules of order ergo anything that happens is caused by him. The NDP blocking the vote was actually the correct thing for them to do. Would you have them roll over and allow JT to do as he pleases unchecked? If that's the case we don't even need parliament, we can just let JT make any law he wants whenever he wants. Don't need debate or a vote or anything silly like that. To h*ll with centuries of refining correct procedure, Justin is god and should be allowed free reign.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
What "bluff"? I've already stated that your comparison is "wrong". Using rape as a comparison to what happened here is beyond the pale. There is no comparison between the 2. People that use this type of comparison do so ONLY to get people to agree with them because disagreeing would mean supporting rape. It is small minded, ignorant, brainless twats that try to use this comparison in an "argument" that they don't have a clue about.

Your right, In that sense.