trudeau crossed the floor and pushed aside NDP MPs

[gerryh]

The sad thing is that the "assisted suicide bill" will now be delayed.

Don't worry. Bills that allow the killing of others always get passed.

 

[PoliticalNick]

So your saying Trudeau deserves being assaulted, then accused of being assaulted because he wanted to get a vote done and over with? Like in rape, the victim is at fault?

You can't excuse the NDP's action because of trudeaus actions

I'm saying if the prissy little b*tch had followed parliamentary procedure and the constitutional requirement to allow debate none of this would have happened. There would have been debate then a vote which their majority would ensure passing. But no, not good enough for the entitled, out of touch rich kid. Instead he wanted the opposition to shut up and let him do as he pleases when he pleases. His bad choice to try to circumvent constitutional requirements (as if the law doesn't apply to him) was the initiating factor and displays an arrogance and child-like attitude I do not want in the HoC. I know your lack of IQ combined with your obvious learning disability will preclude you from understanding most of what I just wrote but others here do understand and you have proven yourself many times to be a moron but I still gotta try to get some intelligent data into your inept little brain.

 

[gerryh]

I'm saying if the prissy little b*tch had followed parliamentary procedure and the constitutional requirement to allow debate none of this would have happened. There would have been debate then a vote which their majority would ensure passing. But no, not good enough for the entitled, out of touch rich kid. Instead he wanted the opposition to shut up and let him do as he pleases when he pleases. His bad choice to try to circumvent constitutional requirements (as if the law doesn't apply to him) was the initiating factor and displays an arrogance and child-like attitude I do not want in the HoC. I know your lack of IQ combined with your obvious learning disability will preclude you from understanding most of what I just wrote but others here do understand and you have proven yourself many times to be a moron but I still gotta try to get some intelligent data into your inept little brain.

IF, he was breaking the "law", then that would have been a fairly simple thing to remedy. Instead, the NDP chose to be childish about it. No laws were broken. Limiting debate is a "legal" parliamentary procedure used by many in the past, both Liberal and Conservative. Do try and get a grip.

 

[Angstrom]

Ya, he's not too bright that way.

No one has offered a good argument to prove me wrong to date. :lol: Let's have it Gerryh. Make your argument.

Ya that's what I thought. You got nothing like politicalnick :lol:

You all say I'm wrong but can't provide any real arguments as to why. Your all so useless to me. Debate me!!!! I want you to prove me wrong!!!!

 

[gerryh]

No one has offered a good argument to prove me wrong to date. :lol: Let's have it Gerryh. Make your argument.

Ya that's what I thought. You got nothing like politicalnick :lol:

You all say I'm wrong but can't provide any real arguments as to why. Your all so useless to me. Debate me!!!! I want you to prove me wrong!!!!

Your comparison is a false comparison. They are not equal in any stretch of the imagination. There is nothing to "prove" wrong. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on how one looks at it, you are too stupid to see that.

 

[Angstrom]

I'm saying if the prissy little b*tch had followed parliamentary procedure and the constitutional requirement to allow debate none of this would have happened. There would have been debate then a vote which their majority would ensure passing. But no, not good enough for the entitled, out of touch rich kid. Instead he wanted the opposition to shut up and let him do as he pleases when he pleases. His bad choice to try to circumvent constitutional requirements (as if the law doesn't apply to him) was the initiating factor and displays an arrogance and child-like attitude I do not want in the HoC. I know your lack of IQ combined with your obvious learning disability will preclude you from understanding most of what I just wrote but others here do understand and you have proven yourself many times to be a moron but I still gotta try to get some intelligent data into your inept little brain.

And I agree with you. Justin's showed a lack of good judgment.


But justify NDP inappropriate behaviour this dose not . :lol:

Your comparison is a false comparison. They are not equal in any stretch of the imagination. There is nothing to "prove" wrong. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on how one looks at it, you are too stupid to see that.

How is victim blaming not universal across all victim blaming events?

 

[gerryh]

How is victim blaming not universal across all victim blaming events?

Using rape as a comparison is the problem, dummy.

 

[Angstrom]

Using rape as a comparison is the problem, dummy.

So your saying I'm right. But You mean that it is too shocking to use rape victim blaming to prove it.

Ok I understand thank you.

 

[gerryh]

So your saying I'm right. But You mean that it is too shocking to use rape victim blaming to prove it.

Ok I understand thank you.

The same way false equivalence is unacceptable.

Shocking has nothing to do with it, so no, you don't understand.


wooooooosh.

 

[PoliticalNick]

My guess is, You don't have any valid argument to justify it. :lol: Because I'm right.

My guess is you have a man-crush on Justin and want have prolonged homosexual relations with him. Face it, you are a closet Liberal. You couldn't get any more rabid in your support of his actions. Tell the truth now....you really want to suck his d*ck don't you?

 

[gerryh]

My guess is you have a man-crush on Justin and want have prolonged homosexual relations with him. Face it, you are a closet Liberal. You couldn't get any more rabid in your support of his actions. Tell the truth now....you really want to suck his d*ck don't you?

and I see you are a homophobe. That would be the only thing that would explain why you would use these statements as a "put down" or in a negative connotation. You and your buddy's up there string up any "faggots" lately?

 

[EagleSmack]

Yikes!!!

 

[PoliticalNick]

The NDP and Con's in parliament will gain from the destruction of the Liberal shiny pony's public image of Justin's character.

They will benefit much more from his lack of experience, overspending and his arrogant incompetence.

Remember Harper? Taking him down was a huge exercise in making the public perceive him as, "not a nice guy"

When you got nothing else you toss feces and hope enough sticks. I didn't agree with all of Steve's tactics or policy but he was far superior as a leader than Justine will ever be.

 

[Locutus]

the only apple-apples comparison here is if a whip strode over and grabbed trudeau by his arm. the spittle would have flown boys and girls.

wonder if the rcmp would get involved? :lol:

 

[PoliticalNick]

The broad majority of those surveyed (71%) said it had no impact on their view of Mr. Trudeau...

We didn't like him before and don't like him now

23% said it made them feel worse about him; 6% better.

I sure hope we don't let that 6% out in public unsupervised

Most (49%) of the 23% who said the incident darkened their view of Mr. Trudeau said they voted CPC last fall.

49% is a minority. If you can't understand simple math like that you have no business running a poll. I sure hope you weren't serious when you posted this tripe.

 

[Angstrom]

Shocking has nothing to do with it, so no, you don't understand.


wooooooosh.

:lol:

Is that the sound your brain make when you have no good argument?

Common Gerryh give me the the logical argument :lol:

We didn't like him before and don't like him now

I sure hope we don't let that 6% out in public unsupervised

49% is a minority. If you can't understand simple math like that you have no business running a poll. I sure hope you weren't serious when you posted this tripe.

Hey leave mentalfart out of this, your fight is with me internet tough guy :lol:

 

[PoliticalNick]

That's what happens when you set yourself up so high :lol:
Everyone will be looking to hit you off that horse. It took 10 years to do it to Harper.

Little by little they will chip away at Justin's public image.
Tom did it to Harper, and now he's going to do it to Trudeau.

You really are totally clueless. Mulcair did nothing to Harper. Steve's downfall was passing c-51 against the wishes of 71% of the population. Quite simple really, he didn't listen to the constituents wishes so they fired his a$$. I have to wonder sometimes how someone with such a lack of ability for thinking as you manages to start your computer let alone post anything.

The people's elbow has spoken.


• Favourability towards the PM didn’t shift a single point.

• On the “personal values he brings to the job”, the rating did not shift a single point. 19% judged his values negatively before the incident and after.

• Before #elbowgate 81% said the PM “genuinely cares about other people”, afterwards, 82% agreed with the same statement.

• Before #elbowgate 76% said the PM “sets a good example for young people in Canada”, afterwards, 77% agreed with the statement.

WAS #ELBOWGATE A PIVOT POINT? | Abacus Data

This from the same people who call 49% "most". :roll:

 

[Angstrom]

You really are totally clueless. Mulcair did nothing to Harper. Steve's downfall was passing c-51 against the wishes of 71% of the population. Quite simple really, he didn't listen to the constituents wishes so they fired his a$$. I have to wonder sometimes how someone with such a lack of ability for thinking as you manages to start your computer let alone post anything.

Gooooood. Use your anger Nick, It gives you focus..... :lol:

 

[gerryh]

Gooooood. Use your anger Nick, It gives you focus..... :lol:

Go back to banging nails. This is obviously WAY over your head.

 

[Angstrom]

With each passing post you prove yourself more of a idiot then anyone of us could ever be