Toronto Terrorists - expected result of invasion

[darkbeaver]

These terrorists,

(what else do you call people who accumulate tons of ammonia nitrate) were not naughty school boys. According to police they had targets picked out that could have killed hundreds, maybe thousands of people. What I don't understand is that these people, for the most part, came from successful families. Families that found a good life in Canada. Are the Mullas the problem? Are the Mullas fanning the flames that drive people to these extremes? If they are, throw them out of the country.

There are lots of people in my community that have huge piles of ammonium nitrate they're called farmers, these same farmers also rutinely keep many hundreds of liters of diesel. The police identified no targets. We are happy because security stopped an attack. Will this be enough to wake up the citizens of Canada or will we endure the real thing if this dosn't steer us in the necessary direction. Rex U.S. Murphy dealt with this incident this evening on CBCs Cross Canada Check-up (cbc radio phone in show) half the callers attacked him for his bias and his portrayal of muslims. A very interesting program and thought by a good percentage of the callers to be very premature with so little details released about the alleged incident. I believe we as Canadians are being guided along a certain path as fast as is possible.
If elements of this group were tagged two years ago, why arrest now? Why not continue to watch and let them pick up others? What triggered these arrests at this time? IMO CSIS knew these arrests would be made last week when they advised us of the definite terror potential. :lol:

 

[darkbeaver]

Re: RE: Toronto Terrorists - expected result of invasion

And so far it looks like all of those agencies did a great job so far in stopping this attack and they should be applauded.

I am wondering though, in the big picture, what Canada will do.

Canadas course is obvious EagleSmack, we will invade and destroy a country that had nothing to do with the alleged attack and steal it's oil while murdering it's helpless citizens. It's time for us to use our balls and moral righteousness to protect our christian family way of life
oh and it's good for business. :lol: Hail Wal-Mart

 

[MMMike]

Re: RE: Toronto Terrorists - expected result of invasion

MMMike, #juan
in order to increase its labor force, Canada must welcome immigrants. They don't come alone, naked, and empty brain. So that Canada makes them all Canadians. They got money, clothes, inteligence, religion, culture.

Many of immigrants give up their past and quickly assimilate into new society, which is Canadian society. Many others cannot give up their own culture while integrating into new society. They live as two life within one period of life.

Canada cannot force them to renounce their past. It should accept both ways. Or, it should stop immigration, leaving its labor force to decline.

Blah blah blah... if your idea of "inclusiveness" includes rolling out the welcome mat for extremist mullahs that preach hatred and stand behind the likes of Bin Laden-loving Kadhrs you're beyond help.

 

[dekhqonbacha]

how can you distinguish a normal person from "extremist mullah?"

 

[darkbeaver]

Darkbeaver types with his nose:

:lol:

_________________
First they ignor you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Mahatma Ghandi

You know usually it's not indicative of anything when someone makes a spelling error. Usually it's a typo or they were in a rush or whatever. I usually just try and concentrate on the persons point (if they have one). But it's really hard to take someone seriously when there's a glaring spelling mistake right there in their signature. I mean this is these are going to be the words that someone figures is going to represent them or something they feel is important and they believe in....and I mean it's their SIGNATURE ....they see it every day in front of them. Every post they make. Looks real stupid when they can't even spell it right....and then it goes over their head for the next 20 months.


I mean you quote someone: you read what they said, and you still spell it wrong. wow. And then this guy is going to try and tell you 'what's what'...and all the conspiricies that are out there and all the lies and all the evidence. You wanna take them seriously but you just can't help but to sit back and laugh. If I could take them seriously maybe I would give them the definitions they are demanding.

:lol:


.

Hey sorry about the percieved spelling error, but it's a silent e and under the new Canadian dictionarys rules you're allowed to drop it.
If you;re not up to speed with language developement don't blame me. I can't take a knit-picker to seriously. I can understand someone of your intelligence not wanting to address questions from an illeterate like myself. But having said that why not address the questions for the benifit of the other members who spell better than I do. Must they be deprived because of me? :lol:

 

[Lineman]

Re: RE: Toronto Terrorists -

Whatever aeon. I've read the threads where you guys argue this. The reason I bring up the theory of evolution (actually you know why I did but now you're going to play dumb) is that people like you decide what constitutes evidence and what doesn't based SOLEY on what you want to believe, not what is.

I could sit here all day and show you 'evidence' of evolution and you could still throw it back in my face and say "it doesn't prove anything" --- and you'd be right, technically.


Same thing with 9/11. We could show you all the dots but you could still refuse to connect them and instead point me to some other site (like you did on the other thread) where they are saying something you prefer....and they have no proof either....just a lot of 'it appears that' and 'sources say perhaps...' and all sorts of circumstantial evidence that is fine when it implies what you believe but worthless when it says something you don't want to believe.


.

All the dots?? show them to me, damn it, this is what i am asking since 9-11, dont bring me this video, brought by us officials.

I guess Al Jezeera is part of the conspiracy then, since they first published the video.

 

[aeon]

Re: RE: Toronto Terrorists -

Sure, I think the government f***** it up. There are lots of things to criticize the government about 9/11.

But al-Qaeda was behind the attacks.

There is no way you can convince the Conspiracy Theorists.....

Many, many films of the aircraft flying into the WTC didn't do it......

Bin Laden claiming responsibility didn't do it..........

It is impossible, so save your breath.

None of this, is an evidence, that alquada was behind it, i 've seen the plane crashing into the wtc, and peoples has to be somekind of retards to believe those building were brought down like they did withouth explosives.

 

[Jersay]

Terrorified people, the question is this has nothing to do with the Islamic community in Canada. This is the first time ever that any Islamic group attacked on Canadian soil, if they were to attack because they are innocent until proven quilty. The other 29 attacks came from Sikhs, Christians, Armenians and other people. So this is kind of stupid. There are radical in all groups in Canada, and this one appears to be politically not religiously motivated.