Tories in damage control over abortion funding

[gerryh]

I'm really sure what Gerry's issue with abortion is. "The law" says it's allowed and since he's used this argument to defend some of his other positions, he does seem to come off as a bit of a hypocrite.

Your really sure are you. Then why don't you explain it.

 

[CDNBear]

I'm really sure what Gerry's issue with abortion is. "The law" says it's allowed and since he's used this argument to defend some of his other positions, he does seem to come off as a bit of a hypocrite.

You look silly crying about hypocrisy.

 

[TenPenny]

I'm not saying that to convince anyone to be against abortion, I just think we need to be a whole lot more controlled over why we abort

I have no problem with that. You can control why you abort, and I'll control why I abort.

Hopefully, gerry can control why he aborts.

 

[CDNBear]

What do guys 'abort'?

 

[lone wolf]

Bad clutch?

 

[cranky]

I have no problem with that. You can control why you abort, and I'll control why I abort.

Hopefully, gerry can control why he aborts.

I dont have a problem with your solution of everyone controlling their own affairs, except I doubt that it will do anything to positively affect our 43 abortions per 100 live births. If we want that number to go down, there will have to be some form of intervention.

 

[Cannuck]

If we want that number to go down, there will have to be some form of intervention.

Then you should vote for Stephen. That's what he would like to see as well.

 

[TenPenny]

I dont have a problem with your solution of everyone controlling their own affairs, except I doubt that it will do anything to positively affect our 43 abortions per 100 live births. If we want that number to go down, there will have to be some form of intervention.

I'm not sure that we need that number to go down. Is there some inherent reason why it should?

 

[gerryh]

I'm not sure that we need that number to go down. Is there some inherent reason why it should?

you're kidding right? You see no reason for the number of baby's killed to go down? I'm sorry to hear that.

 

[cranky]

I'm not sure that we need that number to go down. Is there some inherent reason why it should?

.
what kind of answer or reason are you looking for? isn't a high death count of would be human beings enough?

 

[Cannuck]

you're kidding right? You see no reason for the number of baby's killed to go down? I'm sorry to hear that.

The law says it's OK. Get over it. It's the law.

 

[CDNBear]

The law says it's OK. Get over it. It's the law.

What do you know of the law? You can't even tell the difference between a BCSC ruling and an SCC ruling.

You made a wild claim here...

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/wreck-beach/99644-more-silly-claims-cannuck-r.html#post1413823

And have yet to address your glaring error.

 

[cranky]

The law says it's OK. Get over it. It's the law.

the law says it's OK for the abortion rate to be 1 million abortions per 100 live births. Perhaps that is enough reason for you to accept such a rate?

 

[Cannuck]

the law says it's OK for the abortion rate to be 1 million abortions per 100 live births. Perhaps that is enough reason for you to accept such a rate?

Who says I accept the rate? You are confusing my stance on abortion with my enjoyment at pointing out Gerry's hypocrisy.

 

[CDNBear]

Who says I accept the rate? You are confusing my stance on abortion with my enjoyment at pointing out Gerry's hypocrisy.

You crying about hypocrisy, is funny.

 

[cranky]

Who says I accept the rate? You are confusing my stance on abortion with my enjoyment at pointing out Gerry's hypocrisy.

thanks for clarifying that you have no opinion, I will enjoy ignoring you until you grow some balls

 

[CDNBear]

thanks for clarifying that you have no opinion, I will enjoy ignoring you until you grow some balls

Oh don't ignore him, just keep asking to prove all the claims he's made, that his to cowardly to answer.

It's much more fun watching him twist your words, to avoid doing something, he himself chastises others for failing to do.

hy·poc·ri·sy (h

-p

k

r

-s

)n. pl. hy·poc·ri·sies

1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.
2. An act or instance of such falseness.
3. See Cannuck

 

[gerryh]

.
what kind of answer or reason are you looking for? isn't a high death count of would be human beings enough?

would be humans? At what point do they become humans and what are they before that point?

 

[Cannuck]

thanks for clarifying that you have no opinion, I will enjoy ignoring you until you grow some balls

Who said I have no opinion? You haven't bothered to even ask me if I have one. You seem to like to jump to a lot of conclusions.

 

[cranky]

would be humans? At what point do they become humans and what are they before that point?

good point, I must apologize for my use of words. in most cases, I think they are humans ( ie an individual life) long before they are aborted.

Who said I have no opinion? You haven't bothered to even ask me if I have one. You seem to like to jump to a lot of conclusions.

feel free to clarify anytime