To IMPEACH ????
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
I guess it's could be argued that Trump's legal past does appear to be a tad murky alright, but in quickly scanning over it, it does appear he may have won many more cases than he lost. I might admit (much to Walter's chagrin) that he might be a guy to watch out for. By the same token he may be a guy you want on your side!
I guess it's could be argued that Trump's legal past does appear to be a tad murky alright, but in quickly scanning over it, it does appear he may have won many more cases than he lost. I might admit (much to Walter's chagrin) that he might be a guy to watch out for. By the same token he may be a guy you want on your side!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
I guess it's could be argued that Trump's legal past does appear to be a tad murky alright, but in quickly scanning over it, it does appear he may have won many more cases than he lost. I might admit (much to Walter's chagrin) that he might be a guy to watch out for. By the same token he may be a guy you want on your side!
Murky, lol that's one descriptor.
Democrats call for Bolton to testify in impeachment trial after new report alleges Trump tied Ukraine aid to probe of Bidens
Former national security adviser John Bolton writes in an unpublished manuscript of his forthcoming book that in August, President Trump directly told him that he wanted to keep freezing military aid for Ukraine until its leaders launched investigations into former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter, the New York Times reported Sunday night.
Democrats called on the Republican-controlled Senate to agree to call Bolton as a witness in Trump��s impeachment trial, referring to the new report as "explosive." Bolton has said he would testify before the Senate if subpoenaed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...l_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1
The more leaks like we just had......the tougher it is for the rep senate to justify Trumps behavior. Everything they have come up with so far........was anticipated.
The question is why do people tolerate the fact that the senate is complicit with trump in a cover up?? How is that a fair process?? We know that Trump could care less about the law.........just what HE wants.....and how the law can serve HIM.
Last edited:
watch to see how fast Trump et al.........will try to prevent Boldton from testifying..........or letting contents of his book be used. OBSTRUCTION is Trump's middle name. Saying they want a fair process is just lip service.. as the Trump controlled gang have sold fair trial , integrity in favor of hanging onto power. and prevent Trumps irrational wrath via Twitter. He should be impeached for being the least presidential person in that role.
I in a way hope they bring him and a few other witnesses just to watch it blow up in the Dems. faces, was it leaked with the same editing as the whistle leakers report? By the same Leakers?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitutional qualifications for President, House of Representatives, and Senate are exclusive, i.e., no further requirements can be added without a Constitutional amendment.
I don't think allegations w/o a conviction holds any water in legal circles, just amounts to gossip!
Is Bolton more concerned with the sale of his book as it relates to the impeachment trial?
He might just have some revisions to make....? non?
He might just have some revisions to make....? non?
Either side will cry foul if the impeachement doesn't go their way...
That goes with the folks in this forum too!
That goes with the folks in this forum too!
Yeah I don't think the leak is in full context, and if it does come out in full context the smoking gun will be firing blanks.
lmao You either have no memory or you don't understand what you read beyond two-syllable words.