Threads about China By China

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
A HUGE difference between some idiot prosecutor wanting to put her away, and the Chinese doing it!

And she actually broke a law.

Or three.

Umm...perhaps this guy broke a law in China. That makes him and her equivalent.

For the record, anyone who finds actions like this surprising should be ashamed of themselves. After Tian an men square, one should not be surprised at all. I'm certainly not.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Give me the direction punk , I'll deliver the answer to your questions personally .

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Western political models impossible to co


Over the years, in the name of offering advice for political restructuring, some Western forces and their supporters have constantly put forward the so-called "constitutional reform" proposals focusing on multi-party systems and the separation of the government into three powers. In doing so, the advocates Western democracy, freedom and human rights mislead the public as well as attack the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the socialist system.

All these things reflect their thoughts that China should copy the Western political system. It is rooted in the wrong and harmful idea that the "party rotation," "separation of powers" and "parliamentary democracy" in Western countries are the best systems and are suited for any country.

The precondition for the formation of Western political models is both shameful and impossible to copy.

First, the development of Western countries was based on horrifying pillage and plunder over a long time. According to data provided by Western scholars, for 500 years, 30 million Native Americans suffered genocide and 50 million black slaves were sold to the Americas as a free labor force.

Second, under the pattern of global production and distribution, Western developed countries grabbed the utmost profits, and their development is based on the exploitation of third-world countries. If the wealth base were removed, the so-called electoral and multi-party systems would be difficult to maintain.

So far, almost all third-world countries that simply copied the democratic systems of Western nations have failed, and one important reason is that they do not have as much wealth as Western countries do. If serious interest conflicts occur in a pluralist society, the election will lose effectiveness, and social interests will definitely be redistributed through violence.

In order to reduce internal interest conflicts, Western countries have to establish expensive welfare systems through high transfer payments, but the basis of the welfare systems is the enormous wealth and resources they have been exacting from other parts of the world.

The Western world’s so-called democratic system and functioning civil society would quickly collapse without this basis. For example, riots broke out in Paris and several other French cities in 2005, mainly because a large number of Arabian immigrants, especially youths, found it difficult to land jobs after they moved to France and gradually became resentful of the society. If we go deep enough, we may discover the underlying cause is wealth. The French welfare system is not able to cover all immigrants after all.

What happened after a hurricane hit the relatively poor New Orleans, Louisiana in the United States in August 2005 is yet another example. Due to many rape allegations and armed robberies in the disaster-stricken areas, the army for hurricane relief had to drive armored vehicles and be fully armed. This will never happen in China.

There have been no more than 20 Western developed countries since the 18th century. This bloc has a total population of up to 1 billion, accounting for one-seventh to one-eighth of the world's total. One billion people is the limit of this "rich man's club" because there is no way to make their extravagant life style universal.

We certainly admit and borrow ideas from all the achievements of human civilization, including some useful practices and experiences of Western countries.

However, there is absolutely no reason for us to copy them. The excellent situation of modern China is a hard-won achievement — especially under the volatile international situation and the growing economic crisis. The superior ability of socialist countries to concentrate strength on major problems is continually reflected.

If we copy Western countries, we will lose the ideological basis of the common struggle and the strong leadership core. As a result, the country will soon become a mess and the great cause of national rejuvenation will never be realized.

The Chinese road is a whole new road of the whole nation with independence, hard work, self-esteem and self-improvement and has been created by the lives and blood of millions of Chinese people. However, certain people want to become a new political force through relying on foreign forces. They use dry, abstract sermons and political terms to cover up their selfishness and these people will eventually be cast aside for the people.

Again the shill speaks - The numbers you quote come without any links to provide support - The 30 Million First nations is and has been bandied about as to what the more accurate number is.

Again you shill the number of dead - murdered - plundered - killed - etc - Yet under Mao the Great Leader - He is responsible for and I am going from memory - approx 70 Million - You numbers add up to 80 - That is if they are accurate. But I have found that facts, accuracy, morals and character and empathy for a human being are just some of your failings.

No wonder you are single.

Again the shill for China does not check China's history - Really peaceful those 1600 years or so AD before the Europeans came in great numbers. Really peaceful.

If you are looking for work i know of a place where all that is required is a Stem Cell. You would meet those stringent requirement.

Waiting for a reply

Your ever loving pal and friend The "UBER GOOBER"
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Hu, Obama meet in Seoul

Hu, Obama meet in Seoul

(Xinhua)
Updated: 2010-11-11 15:50



Chinese President Hu Jintao (R) meets US President Barack Obama as part of the G20 Summit in Seoul, November 11, 2010. [Photo/Agencies]
SEOUL -- Chinese President Hu Jintao and his US counterpart Barack Obama met in Seoul Thursday to exchange views on Sino-US relations and other major world and regional issues of common concern.
Hu and Obama are meeting on the sidelines of the fifth Group of 20 (G20) summit, at which the participants will mainly discuss how to deal with challenges to the ongoing global economic recovery from a world financial crisis and pave the way for future sustainable and balanced growth.
Hu said that China is willing to strengthen the dialogue, exchanges and cooperation with the United States so as to further promote their positive, cooperative and comprehensive relations.
China believes that good Sino-US ties are not only in the interests of the two countries and two peoples, but also conform to the world peace, stability and development, he said.
"China-US relations have become stronger over the last few years. We discussed a whole range of issues, not only bilaterally, but world issues," Obama said.
"As two leading nuclear powers, obviously we get special obligations to deal with issues of nuclear proliferation."
Obama also said as two big economies in the world, "we have special obligation to deal with ensuring strong, balanced and sustainable growth."

Special Coverage:
Hu Attends G20 Summit
Related readings:
US expert expects US-China co-op at G20 Summit
President Hu arrives in Seoul for G20 summit
President Hu leaves for G20 summit in Seoul
Germany to reject current account limits at G20

This is the third meeting between Hu and Obama in eight months. They met in Washington last April when President Hu was there to attend a nuclear security summit. They met again in Toronto, Canada, last June on the sidelines of the fourth summit of G20. During their Toronto meeting, Hu accepted Obama's invitation for a state visit to the United States early next year.
"China and the United States have maintained close communications on matters concerning the visit," Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ma Zhaoxu told a regular press conference last month.
He said that both China and the United States are expecting the visit to be successful in making progress on a positive, cooperative and comprehensive China-US relationship in the 21st century.
In a meeting with two senior US officials last September, President Hu called on China and the United States to view their bilateral relationship from a global and strategic perspective.
Furthering the positive, cooperative and comprehensive China-US relationship is more important than ever before, as the world is still facing an uncertain economic recovery and various prominent challenges, Hu told Lawrence Summers, head of President Obama's National Economic Council, and then US Deputy National Security Adviser Tom Donilon.
"China and the United States should make unremitting efforts to enhance dialogue and cooperation, increase common interests, and properly handle problems that emerge in bilateral ties," Hu said.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
DurkaDurka;

[/QUOTE]
lol, still feeling burned by that, China?
"runs and hides from China"
Goober

Waiting for a reply
Your ever loving pal and friend The "UBER GOOBER"
Oh ye men of little brain...........

The wedding coach comes back to life .

(chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2010-11-11 17:18



A groom carries his bride from a wedding coach in Xuchang, Henan province, Nov 11, 2010. Produced by a local factory, various original hand-made wedding carriages were displayed on the streets, attracting young people chasing fashion and an environment-friendly lifestyle. [Photo/Asianewsphoto]​

Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Next Page
Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Next Page

Seagull 300 takes to the sky in maiden flight

(chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2010-11-11 17:55



The Seagull 300, the first China-made light multi-functional amphibious plane moves forward on the runway at an airport in Shijiazhuang in North China's Hebei province, Nov 10, 2010. The plane, manufactured by Shijiazhuang Aircraft Industry Co Ltd, is the first of its kind in China to have independent intellectual property rights. [Photo/Asianewsphoto]

Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page
Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page


 
Last edited:

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Re: Hu, Obama meet in Seoul

DaSleeper, thanks for appreciating my attampt at being a smile to this forum.

But seriously, what world leader in their right mind would ever want to be besmirched by being called Obama's soul-mate? Except of course, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez or Robert Mugabe.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Cameron sees China's rise as an opportunity

Cameron sees China's rise as an opportunity .
BEIJING - As British Prime Minister David Cameron entered a Peking University lecture hall on Wednesday to meet more than 500 students, he did so with his own fond memories of living and studying in Hong Kong more than two decades earlier.

Related readings:
China, UK pledge pragmatic economic cooperation
Cameron wraps up China visit
Hu: China-Britain co-op outweighs competition
Chinese President meets British PM


"Twenty five years ago I came to Hong Kong as a student. The year was 1985," Cameron said. The 44-year-old Oxford graduate and youngest prime minister in British history told the audience that "real relations" between China and the UK are founded on people to people exchanges as well as on higher levels.
The young audience was surprised that the British leader could recite the first line of lyrics of China's national anthem in Chinese. "Stand up, stand up," he said with a not-so-standard accent, and then quickly joked, "you see I still have some study to do". "Today the Chinese people are not just standing up in their own country they are standing up in the world," Cameron said.
In his 30-minute speech, Cameron reiterated that Britain sees China's rise as an "opportunity, not a threat. I say it's an opportunity. I choose engagement, not disengagement; dialogue, not stand-off; mutual benefit, not zero-sum game; partnership, not protectionism".
Cameron talked through a wide range of topics from bilateral trade to international affairs, and from China's success to its growing responsibility.
Immediately after the speech, the prime minister handpicked five students from the audience and answered their questions.
"As well as giving China suggestions, what can Britain learn from the country?" one student asked.
The prime minister said there are "many things".
"The first thing I want to learn from you is the Olympics and London is about to hold the games in 2012." Cameron also said the world should learn how China lifted 500 million people out of poverty in just 30 years. "It's clear we still have to know how you generated the growth," he said.
"I'm quite pleased with his answers in general, although I did not have the chance to raise my questions with him," said Xiao Yineng, a chemistry major student.
He said he wanted to ask Cameron to comment on the G20 summit and the Western media's reporting style. "I'm very interested in international politics, and I know that Britain will cut about $130 billion in spending. It seems the prime minister is quite practical."
Zhou Wa contributed to this story.
China Daily
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Divided We Fall



Divided We Fall
Why united action on climate change is vital
By HUANG HUIKANG


July 28, 2009 witnessed the initialling of the U.S.-China Memorandum of Understanding to Enhance Cooperation on Climate Change, Energy and the Environment. China Foto Press
SINCE the mid-18th century Earth’s climate systems have been undergoing detectable changes, mainly characterized by continuous warming and its various effects. This tendency shows itself to be stronger in the 21st century. Threats to humankind of the adverse impacts of global warming emerge in everyday measures of our “norms,” such as the rise of sea levels, deterioration of ecological environments, rampant and frequent typhoons, heatwaves, droughts, floods and other extreme weather conditions. Climate change directly affects not only individual lives and national interests, but also world peace and justice. The whole world is concerned.
Climate change knows no boundaries. It is a universal issue unconfined by natural or political geography in that it generates more than atmospheric and environmental impacts. No country and no region can escape its reach, and no country can handle it alone. International cooperation is the only hope for mitigation.

International Efforts
A trail of research speaks to the historic roots of the current global warming crisis. In its long existence, Earth has experienced several spells of warming and cooling, as is the course of nature. But the latest warming trend bears little resemblance to natural laws we have witnessed or inferred from evidence; it appears to be a result of human activities. More to the point, developed countries have consumed, and continue to consume, a massive amount of fossil fuel since the Industrial Revolution; their lasting obsession with an energy-guzzling lifestyle has increased the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases, consequently strengthening the “greenhouse effect” and unleashing an implacable ascent of terrestrial and atmospheric temperatures. It can be said that developed countries are the primary culprits in global warming and the majority of developing countries its victims. Therefore, in the international campaign against climate change, the developed world has the historical, moral and legal obligation to take the lead in cutting emissions and to provide financial and technological support for developing countries to do the same.
The international community started to focus on the issue of climate change in the 1970s. In 1979 the first World Climate Conference was convened; it worked out a comprehensive climate plan and unveiled a global climate change research program. In 1988 the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) initiated a joint Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); IPCC’s assessment reports in 1990, 1995, 2001 and 2007 provided scientific evidence and suggested response stimuli for international climate change negotiations. In 1990 the UN Assembly decided to start intergovernmental climate change negotiations. Two years later the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, or Rio Summit) passed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Climate Change Convention), which outlined objectives and principles for combating climate change, and defined the rights and obligations of member countries. In 1997 further agreement was reached on the Kyoto Protocol. Both the Convention and its Protocol stand as important interim achievements made by the international community. Reached after years of hard negotiations, they represent a world consensus and provide the legal basis and guidelines for the international campaign against climate change.
International negotiations on climate change have continued since the Convention and its Protocol came into effect. At the heart of every discussion to follow was how to promote overall and effective implementation of the two documents, and in particular, urge developed countries to fulfill their commitments and obligations. But the Bush Administration in the United States, swayed by domestic political considerations, refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol. Meanwhile, some other developed countries who had affixed their signatures became unwilling to face up to their historic responsibilities and follow through on their promises. Consequently, implementation of the Convention and its Protocol remains far from satisfactory, and international negotiations have since seen little or no progress.
Global warming is, without question, a scientific fact; countermeasures are imperative. Various countries, particularly in the developed world, must take immediate action on international cooperation – for the common interest of humankind and the welfare of future generations.
Basic Principles in International Cooperation
The Climate Change Convention and its Kyoto Protocol laid down the ultimate objectives and basic principles for international cooperation on climate change slowdown and mitigation of its effects.
According to the definition of the Convention, climate change is “a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.” The ultimate objective of the Convention is to stabilize the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases to a level that will prevent “dangerous” human interference with the natural climate systems. The Convention has therefore established the following basic principles:
The first principle addresses equality and “common but differentiated responsibilities.” Signatory countries agree that global climate change and its adverse effects are shared concerns of humankind and that the universality of the phenomenon requires all countries to do their best to engage in the widest possible cooperation on mounting effective and appropriate actions. The first item of Article Three says, “The Parties should protect the climate system for the benefit of present and future generations of humankind, on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Accordingly, the developed country Parties should take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse effects thereof.” This principle clarifies that developed countries should be held responsible for historic emission accumulation and their high per-capita discharges. This means changing their unsustainable lifestyles, significantly reducing emissions, and furthermore, providing the capital and technology that will enhance the capabilities of developing countries to join the fight.
The second principle takes into consideration the economic and societal needs of developing countries. Item Two of Article Three says: “The specific needs and special circumstances of developing country Parties, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, and of those Parties, especially developing country Parties, that would have to bear a disproportionate or abnormal burden under the Convention, should be given full consideration.” Economic development and poverty reduction are recognized as the paramount tasks of the developing world for the time being, though during this transition, they are expected to take adaptive measures to reduce contributing to climate stress and to mitigate its effects. How best they can perform their duties depends very much on the level of financial and technological support they receive from developed countries.
Third is the principle of sustainable growth. Climate change is both an environmental and developmental issue, but development is primary. Therefore environmental imperatives should be acted on together with the social and economic goals of a country. Climate change policies and measures should suit the conditions prevalent in each country, and integrated with national development plans. In short, sustainability goals for developing countries should incorporate the right of countries to develop. Under a sustainability framework, economic development is viewed comprehensively, with consideration given to uninterrupted economic growth, poverty reduction and environmental protection, as well as climate change. The related policies and measures should also be cost-effective and consistent with global targets.
The fourth principle stresses the priority ranking of precautionary action, and roles of mitigation and adaptation strategies. The Convention urges its members to establish mechanisms to “anticipate, prevent or minimize the causes of climate change and mitigate its adverse effects.” When facing the threat of serious or irreversible damage, such measures should not be postponed on the basis of “lack of full scientific certainty.” Mitigation and adaptation are two important aspects of combating climate change and deserve equal attention. Mitigation can be long and arduous, while adaptation is immediate and urgent (and by sheer exposure to emergencies, most important to the developing countries). Capital and technology are the indispensable means and guarantees for action on mitigation and adaptation; the financial support of developed countries is also an important and effective weapon in the climate change combat zone.
The above basic principles are a collective cornerstone for international cooperation in preventing and reversing the impacts of global warming, defining clearly the differentiated responsibilities and obligations of developed and developing participants – the right map for a long journey.

China’s Participation
China is one of the hardest-hit victims of climate change in the world. Painful disasters have recently pushed our resolve forward. The Chinese government has participated actively in international negotiations, bearing in mind the long-term interests of the Chinese people and all of humankind.
China was an active party in the Convention and its Protocol negotiations and signed them respectively on June 11, 1992 and May 29, 1998; it was among the first group of signatory countries, and the two documents also apply to Hong Kong and Macao special administrative regions.
Chinese scientists are earnestly involved in major international scientific research projects, including the World Climate Research Program, International Geosphere-Biosphere Program, International Human Dimension of Global Environmental Change Program, the biodiversity research program DIVERSITAS, Earth System Science Partnership, Global Climate Observing System, and Group on Earth Observations.
In the 21st century, the Chinese government has established channels and platforms for exchanges with major developed countries, and conducted fruitful, substantial cooperation projects with them. In 2003 China and Canada signed a joint communiqué declaring their willingness to strengthen their dialogues and cooperation on climate change. They also set up a joint working group, initiating bilateral governmental cooperation in the field. In September 2005 Chinese and EU leaders published a joint communiqué and decided to form a climate change partnership that included a regular discussion mechanism, which in 2010 was elevated to the ministerial level. China has also signed joint communiqués on climate change with Australia and Japan, establishing dialogue channels and agreeing to work hand in hand in combating climate change. In November 2009 on U.S. President Obama’s visit to China, the two countries signed a memorandum of understanding on climate, environment and energy cooperation. Climate change has remained a priority topic in recent years for high-level meetings between China and other countries.
China’s international cooperation in the field is not confined to developed countries. As a member of the developing world, the Chinese government pays special attention to dialogues and cooperation with the Group of 77 and other developing countries. It has initiated the China-Africa climate change partnership and set up regular, ministerial-level dialogue mechanisms with India, Brazil and South Africa. Within the framework of the South-South Cooperation, China has done its utmost to support the developing world, particularly Africa’s least developed countries. After the founding of the China-Africa Cooperation Forum in 2000, China forgave many interest-free debts coming due before 2005; these loans were to the least developed and most heavily indebted of African countries with which China had diplomatic relations. From 2007 to 2009 China provided to some of the same countries in excess of US $3 billion in preferential construction and development loans.
At the China-Africa Cooperation Forum Fourth Ministerial Meeting in November 2009, Premier Wen Jiabao proposed the establishment of a China-Africa partnership on climate change and suggested periodic high-level meetings and cooperation agreements on climate indicators measurement, new energy development, desertification control and protection of urban environments. In the subsequent Sharm el-Sheikh Action Plan (2010-2012), China expressed its support for justified appeals by African countries, including their request that developed countries increase their financial support and technology transfer. For its part, China promised to strengthen human resources training for Africa in new energy utilization, environmental management and pollution prevention. China also agreed to establish within a three-year period (starting in 2010) 100 aid projects, including building small methane, solar and hydraulic clean power stations and drilling wells. China expressed a willingness to continue sharing with African countries the data from the China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellites (CBERS), and to promote its application in support of Africa’s utilization of its land resources, climate observation, and environmental protection activities. China will directly extend a helping hand to African countries in the areas of enhancing monitoring capabilities, protecting or reviving ecological systems, biodiversity, and exercising desertification controls.

Boosting International Cooperation
The battle against climate change will be a long one; it requires more extensive and intense international cooperation. For the next round of negotiations and cooperation, the international community should continue with the dual-track negotiation process established in the Bali Roadmap. First, agreement should be reached on emission reduction targets for signatory developed countries in the second commitment period; developed countries that have not signed the Kyoto Protocol should also adopt commeasurable emission reductions targets under the framework of the Climate Change Convention. Second, arrangements are imperative to establish effective mechanisms that ensure developed countries fulfill their commitments regarding the provision of financial, technological and capability-building support to developing countries. Developed countries should move quickly on their “fast-start funding” agreement – US $30 billion, and make transparent plans for reaching their long-term funding targets. Meanwhile, developing countries should take appropriate action on the environment in accordance with their national conditions and within the framework of sustainable development. At the core of all actions is commitment to the principles of equality and “common but differentiated responsibilities.”
Frequent climate disasters are warnings to all of us that it is imperative to act. Only by moving forward, fulfilling our promises and constructing win-win scenarios can humankind make continuous progress in this global war. At the 2009 Copenhagen Summit, Premier Wen Jiabao made an unconditional commitment to the world: China would reduce its unit GDP carbon dioxide emissions by 40-45 percent from the 2005 baseline. The Chinese government will ceaselessly strive to realize and even surpass that target, for the benefit of the Chinese people as well as the people of the world.
In the Post-Copenhagen era, re-establishment of mutual trust is paramount. China will work earnestly with the rest of the world to propel international cooperation on climate change, and do its own part to ensure fruitful international negotiations and cooperation.
HUANG HUIKANG is special representative of the Chinese Foreign Ministry to climate change negotiations, legal advisor to the ministry, and a member of the UN International Law Commission.
 
Last edited:

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
DurkaDurka;
Goober

Oh ye men of little brain...........

The wedding coach comes back to life .

(chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2010-11-11 17:18



A groom carries his bride from a wedding coach in Xuchang, Henan province, Nov 11, 2010. Produced by a local factory, various original hand-made wedding carriages were displayed on the streets, attracting young people chasing fashion and an environment-friendly lifestyle. [Photo/Asianewsphoto]​

Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Next Page
Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Next Page

Seagull 300 takes to the sky in maiden flight

(chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2010-11-11 17:55



The Seagull 300, the first China-made light multi-functional amphibious plane moves forward on the runway at an airport in Shijiazhuang in North China's Hebei province, Nov 10, 2010. The plane, manufactured by Shijiazhuang Aircraft Industry Co Ltd, is the first of its kind in China to have independent intellectual property rights. [Photo/Asianewsphoto]

Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page
Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page


[/QUOTE]
And this reply to DurkaDurka Rates What?

"Give me the direction punk , I'll deliver the answer to your questions personally ".

I can give you my directions if you see fit to come on out here.

Goober

Oh ye men of little brain...........


And this reply to DurkaDurka Rates What?

"Give me the direction punk , I'll deliver the answer to your questions personally ".

I can give you my directions if you see fit to come on out here.[/QUOTE]

PS - Bring Jbeee with you - it still would not be fair as there would only be 2 of you. Last one i had was not fair either, only 3 of them.
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
51
This thread has been created for a reason, china. Stop creating various threads about China that nobody replies to and post them IN THIS THREAD. I am getting tired of moving them here.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
This thread has been created for a reason, china. Stop creating various threads about China that nobody replies to and post them IN THIS THREAD. I am getting tired of moving them here.
.......so sorry .
 
Last edited:

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Upon the arrival of the J-8F Fighters in Zhuhai on Nov. 12, 2010, aircrafts from China Air Force have been all in place for the Airshow China 2010.

China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition (namely Airshow China) is the only international aerospace trade show in China that is endorsed by the Chinese central government. Since 1996, the show has been successfully held in Zhuhai in every even-number year for seven sessions. Airshow China 2010 will take place from Nov.16th – 21st, 2010 in Zhuhai.


2.jpg (56.89 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


J-8F Fighter

11.jpg (69.85 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


J-8F Fighter

12.jpg (90.36 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


J-8F Fighter

13.jpg (79.86 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


J-8F Fighter

3.jpg (81.67 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


JH-7A Fighter Bomber

4.jpg (81.67 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


JH-7A Fighter Bomber

9.jpg (110.84 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


JH-7A Fighter Bomber

10.jpg (96.87 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


JH-7A Fighter Bomber

8.jpg (35.35 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


KJ-200

1.jpg (72.68 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


H-6H Bomber

5.jpg (88.63 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


H-6H Bomber

6.jpg (78.96 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31


H-6H Bomber

7.jpg (73.23 KB)
2010-11-13 15:31
H-6H Bomber


Comment: Fight corruption while naming officials



13:24, November 08, 2010



Malpractices are rampant in the appointment of officials. This is both a reason for, and an outcome of, the prevalence of corruption in public offices. The Communist Party of China knows this, and wants desperately to solve the problem. The CPC's disciplinary and organizational departments and the Ministry of Supervision have just issued a joint decree stating that they will crack down on the offering and taking of bribes in official appointments. They made public the specifics of 12 violations.

That the appointment of officials has become a new trading place for public and private interests is an indication that the traditional approach is failing. The emerging consensus is that a government built on the favors and disfavors of individual leaders cannot deliver good governance.

So long as it is not done merely to lower the average age of public-office holders, which has often be the case, we agree there is an imperative to breathe new life into our less-than-respected public offices. The CPC and government offices never have to worry about lack of candidates, but the question remains who should be appointed, and how.

In the "two-way exchange" program that brings promising young officials to central government offices from the provinces, and dispatches young officials with leadership potential the other way, those born in the 1960s are in the absolute majority. Aging is a natural phenomenon. Sooner or later, younger people will take the place of their elders. This is natural. Life-long tenure for leaders, no matter how capable they are, does no good to society. Nor does poorly thought-out age limits for public offices. That is why we disagree with any favor or discrimination based solely on age.

There is a universal understanding that as long as the CPC's watchdog wants to bite, there is no safe haven for corrupt elements. The stark reality, however, is that it simply cannot take care of all the problems. Nor would it be possible or fair to have every case attended to personally by somebody of a sufficiently high rank.

Numerous similar proposals and heavy-handed campaigns have failed to stem corruption. But this is not because our leaders are not serious about their pledges. However, to achieve the desired result, we need a change in approach.

Since decisions made behind closed doors have bigger risks of failure, and public-office holders are supposed to serve the public, and are supported by taxpayer's money, taxpayers deserve some say in such processes.

Or at the very least, the appointment of public officials should be conducted in broad daylight.

Source:China Daily




 
Last edited:

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Home>>Sports >> Others
African women's association donates 350,000 yuan to help underprivileged Chinese



20:09, June 02, 2010


E
An African women's association Wednesday donated more than 350,000 yuan to Chinese charity organizations to help vulnerable people.

The funds were raised by the Southern African Development Community Diplomatic Women's Association in Beijing to improve the welfare of orphans and the disabled under the theme, "Disability is not inability."

The rotating chair of the association, Ange Mumbala Kumpel, said the donations prove the association's ability to improve the lives of underprivileged people and they will support and encourage Chinese charity groups to continue in this regard.

Zhang Yu,a representative of a performing troupe, accepted a check at the embassy of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The aid will mean more opportunities for the mentally-disabled to show off their artistic talent and earn dignity and respect, he said.

The women's association was founded in 2007 with the aim of helping the underprivileged in China.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Could Chinese missiles close US bases in attack?
3.jpg (30.51 KB)
2010-11-14 09:56





The Chinese military’s non-nuclear missiles have “the capability to attack” and close down five of six major U.S. Air Force bases in South Korea and Japan, an unpublished government report says.


China’s improved inventory of short- and medium-range missiles provides a “dramatic increase” in its ability to “inhibit” U.S. military operations in the western Pacific, according to excerpts from the draft of the 2010 annual report by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission scheduled for release on Nov. 17.


China’s current force “may be sufficient” to destroy runways, parked aircraft, fuel and maintenance facilities at Osan and Kunsan air bases in South Korea, and Kadena, Misawa and Yokota bases in Japan, the report says. The facilities are within 1,100 kilometers (684 miles) of China.


An upgraded missile arsenal, including a 30 percent increase in cruise missiles since last year, “poses a significant challenge to U.S. forces operating in the region,” the report says. Defense Secretary Robert Gates in June called China’s improved missile arsenal “a real concern” that also threatens U.S. aircraft carriers.


1.jpg (56.92 KB)
2010-11-14 09:56




2.jpg (72.65 KB)
2010-11-14 09:56





The 12-member bipartisan commission was created by Congress in 2000 to monitor the U.S. national security implications of China’s economic and military rise and to report annually to lawmakers with recommendations for U.S. action.


The commission’s 2010 report says Congress should evaluate Pentagon spending to fortify bases from Chinese attack, including missile defenses, early warning systems, runway repairs and hardening buildings and hangars.


Increased military spending could benefit companies that make sea-based missile defense and electronic warfare systems, said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Virginia.


The report also said U.S. Pacific commanders, as part of their annual budget statements, should report on the “adequacy of the U.S. military’s capability to withstand Chinese air and missile assault on regional bases” as well as steps being taken to strengthen U.S. defenses.


The commission’s conclusions are “certainly much stronger” and “much more explicit” than related findings in the Pentagon’s own annual report on Chinese military developments, said Mark Stokes, an analyst for the non-profit Project 2049 Institute in Arlington, Virginia, that studies Asia security issues.


The commission’s report says a decade of improvements in ballistic missiles and in advanced aircraft carrying precision- guided weapons “have greatly improved China’s ability to carry out” a strategy designed to hinder or prevent the U.S. from operating in the region or from aiding Taiwan in a conflict.


Separately, the commission warns that “the future deployment” of China’s new anti-ship ballistic missile “could seriously interfere” with U.S. regional access.


China “appears to be in the final stage of developing” the missile capable of targeting large ships at sea such as aircraft carriers,’’ the report says.


The missile, with a range of almost 900 miles, would be fired from mobile, land-based launchers and is “specifically designed to defeat U.S. carrier strike groups,” the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence has reported.


The Pentagon places a “high priority” on responding to the increased threat to U.S. bases and vessels and it “is soon to gain a much higher profile as a critical public policy challenge,” said Richard Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center, a nonpartisan research group based in Alexandria, Virginia. (From Bloomberg)




Could Chinese missiles close US bases in attack?

 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Skyscraper safety a concern for China


A fire that claimed 53 lives in a 28-story building in the center of Shanghai has made people rethink the safety of high-rises that have been mushrooming up across the country with the economic boom.

Like the CCTV fire last year in Beijing, the Shanghai fire revealed the embarrassing lack of fire safety measures and facilities in China's biggest metropolises.

The first fire trucks arriving at the scene could not do much about the fire that burnt beyond their reach. When the imported fire truck that is capable of dealing with a fire 300 meters high eventually arrived, the fire was already out of control.

There are other concerns, such as whether the building was equipped with enough fire extinguishers to put out the fire in the first place, and whether workers as well as residents in this building had undergone any fire safety training. Allegedly, the construction workers also broke safety rules as well while they were welding, which is believed to be the origin of the fire.

It is hard to imagine what the result would be if a similar fire broke out in a high-rise building in a second or third-tier city.

China has an increasing number of high-rises that dwarf many famous buildings in the world. It has been developing the world's largest high-speed railways and super highways. Yet Chinese urban dwellers feel a major lack of security, be it food, traffic, housing or other facilities.

The nation may have been in a rush in its earlier pursuits to ensure its people have enough to eat and wear, which resulted in poorly supervised and unregulated development. It is time to address the quality of life in China now that those days are gone.

China's modernization should not only mean a wealthier life for its citizens. The drive for modernization should also include the quest for a greater peace of mind. The government and corporate groups should notice the change in society and try to meet the demand.

The authorities should attach as much importance in safety as they do with national defense and social stability. It is not only a humanitarian responsibility of the government, but also a demonstration of the state's power.

It will also give greater confidence of the people toward the country and the government.

Before more tragedies happen, China should take decisive steps to address many of its safety problems in food, health, transportation, housing and other areas.

Only by ensuing people's sense of security can the country declare that it is on the right path toward a modern and civil society.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Re: Skyscraper safety a concern for China


A fire that claimed 53 lives in a 28-story building in the center of Shanghai has made people rethink the safety of high-rises that have been mushrooming up across the country with the economic boom.

Like the CCTV fire last year in Beijing, the Shanghai fire revealed the embarrassing lack of fire safety measures and facilities in China's biggest metropolises.

The first fire trucks arriving at the scene could not do much about the fire that burnt beyond their reach. When the imported fire truck that is capable of dealing with a fire 300 meters high eventually arrived, the fire was already out of control.

There are other concerns, such as whether the building was equipped with enough fire extinguishers to put out the fire in the first place, and whether workers as well as residents in this building had undergone any fire safety training. Allegedly, the construction workers also broke safety rules as well while they were welding, which is believed to be the origin of the fire.

It is hard to imagine what the result would be if a similar fire broke out in a high-rise building in a second or third-tier city.

China has an increasing number of high-rises that dwarf many famous buildings in the world. It has been developing the world's largest high-speed railways and super highways. Yet Chinese urban dwellers feel a major lack of security, be it food, traffic, housing or other facilities.

The nation may have been in a rush in its earlier pursuits to ensure its people have enough to eat and wear, which resulted in poorly supervised and unregulated development. It is time to address the quality of life in China now that those days are gone.

China's modernization should not only mean a wealthier life for its citizens. The drive for modernization should also include the quest for a greater peace of mind. The government and corporate groups should notice the change in society and try to meet the demand.

The authorities should attach as much importance in safety as they do with national defense and social stability. It is not only a humanitarian responsibility of the government, but also a demonstration of the state's power.

It will also give greater confidence of the people toward the country and the government.

Before more tragedies happen, China should take decisive steps to address many of its safety problems in food, health, transportation, housing and other areas.

Only by ensuing people's sense of security can the country declare that it is on the right path toward a modern and civil society.

Pretty difficulct to enforce standards when most involved from the builder, the future owner, the Princleings all want as much profit as possible. Then again most of them have multiple passports for the fast getaway when the whole place comes a tumbling down. Read you history about revoulution in China. When the masses revolt - Heads will roll.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Re: Part of the plot to contain China .

basically eao....who the f*ck cares? If they want to award a chinese dissident the Nobel peace prize for his work, then they have every right to do that and the Chinese government can suck dick. Or do they suddenly have the right to tell others what they can and can't do. Like get pissed off at the Canadian Government for meetings with the Dalia Lama.
Society



China mine safety official jailed for life

(Xinhua)
Updated: 2010-11-17 22:43



Comments(1)
Print
Mail
Large Medium Small CHONGQING - A coal mine safety official in Southwest China was sentenced to life in prison Wednesday for taking 9 million yuan ($1.35 million) in bribes.

Related readings:
Former mine safety official stands trial
Five jailed for China mine blast that kills 76
Officials penalized after deadly mine flood
Water leakage kills 12 in SW China coal mine

The No 5 Intermediate People's Court in Chongqing municipality announced the verdict on Wednesday in which Wang Xiping, former deputy director of Chongqing municipal administration of coal mine safety, along with three other defendants, were found guilty. Wang was convicted of accepting 5.4 million yuan as bribes from coal mine owners, along with Chen Hongqiang, Wu Jungen and Lin Hua, between August 2000 and July 2009, the court said.
Wang was also found guilty of acting on his own when demanding and accepting 3.6 million yuan in bribes from more than 20 coal mine bosses.
The other two principals, Chen, a former criminal police officer, and Wu, former chief of the technology and equipment department under the municipal coal mine safety administration, were both sentenced to 15 years in jail.
Lin, who worked at a vehicle rental company, was also found guilty of accepting a 50,000-yuan car for Wang, and also used the car, himself.
As an accomplice, Lin was jailed for one and a half years.
The four defendants did not appeal the first-instance verdict at the court.
 
Last edited:

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Re: Part of the plot to contain China .

Society





China mine safety official jailed for life

(Xinhua)
Updated: 2010-11-17 22:43


Comments(1)
Print
Mail
Large Medium Small CHONGQING - A coal mine safety official in Southwest China was sentenced to life in prison Wednesday for taking 9 million yuan ($1.35 million) in bribes.

Related readings:
Former mine safety official stands trial

Five jailed for China mine blast that kills 76

Officials penalized after deadly mine flood

Water leakage kills 12 in SW China coal mine

The No 5 Intermediate People's Court in Chongqing municipality announced the verdict on Wednesday in which Wang Xiping, former deputy director of Chongqing municipal administration of coal mine safety, along with three other defendants, were found guilty. Wang was convicted of accepting 5.4 million yuan as bribes from coal mine owners, along with Chen Hongqiang, Wu Jungen and Lin Hua, between August 2000 and July 2009, the court said.
Wang was also found guilty of acting on his own when demanding and accepting 3.6 million yuan in bribes from more than 20 coal mine bosses.
The other two principals, Chen, a former criminal police officer, and Wu, former chief of the technology and equipment department under the municipal coal mine safety administration, were both sentenced to 15 years in jail.
Lin, who worked at a vehicle rental company, was also found guilty of accepting a 50,000-yuan car for Wang, and also used the car, himself.
As an accomplice, Lin was jailed for one and a half years.
The four defendants did not appeal the first-instance verdict at the court.

How many mines are unsafe - How many workers die in mines each year. How mnay mines are operating without permits but overlooked by the local kingpin.
My Lord you do need help.