This Is The Grecian Formula Election

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
- No matter who wins the upcoming presidential election, it could well be named The Grecian Formula election.

- While I don't want to come across being as ridiculous as Harry Reid in spreading unlikely and wholly unsubstantiated allegations against Romney, I have suspected for some time that Mitt uses Grecian Formula to keep his hair looking a youthful black. After all, the man is 65 years old, just five years younger than Ronald Reagan was when Dutch ran against Carter, and his father George's similarly thick head of hair started turning gray when he was only in his fifties. (Reagan, as you will recall, didn't use Grecian Formula, its just that his hair was prematurely orange.)

- So I suggest that a vote for Romney is a vote for the old Grecian Formula.

- On the other hand, a vote for Obama is a vote for the new Grecian Formula.

- For those blissfully unaware of such critical matters, the old Grecian Formula turns the hair black while the new Grecian Formula turns the government's books red.

- Obama's four years of unprecedented economic and fiscal failures have increasingly resembled what is happening today in Greece and to a lesser but still ultimately disasterous extent among the rest of the PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain) as they hurtle toward bankruptcy and dormant private sector economies with unemployment already above 25% and rising.

- The new Grecian Formula is really quite simple: create ever more bloated, wasteful, ineffective, inefficient government with a priveleged, overpaid, overpensioned, overperked and underworked public sector that gradually drives up taxes and debt to the point that the competitive market sector is first stifled and then strangled and thus severe cuts in entitlements are required and riots in the streets result.

- Amusingly, some think that the US economy and fiscal situation is somehow magically immune to this spreading disaster which Obama will exaccerbate rather than seek to ameliorate in a second term all too similar to his first term.

- Tell that to the seven US cities that have already declared bankruptcy in the past 18 months (with more of them to come) and to the city of Scranton, Pennsylvania which has had to reduce the pay of all 398 of its city workers including engineers and accountants and other professionals to the minimum wage of $7.25 an hour just to be able to pay the pensions and benefits of its retired employees. I could continue with accounts of the severe current financial struggles of other US states and cities but this is enough to make the point and those who care can do their own research into the matter.

- In any case, the choice is between Romney, the old Grecian Formula, and Mitt's determination to restore the US to its traditional path of exceptionalism and enterprise and Obama, the new Grecian Formula and the continued weakening of the US economy and fiscal situation until it, too, becomes a facsimile of what is happening in the southern nations of Western Europe. You might call it the choice between exceptionalism and enterprise on one side and bloated government and unsustainable entitlements on the other.

- Who will win this Grecian Formula election?

- Given the bump that Obama gained from the ill wind named Sandy, it is now too close to call, a virtual dead heat in the averaging of the opinion polls.

- This is the first election in decades that I find too close to make a bet on although the concensus of the pundits and the polls is that Obama should squeek through with a 1-2% lead in the popular vote and about a 40 seat electoral college lead (290-300 vs 248-238).

- Of course the liberal MSM had the same take on the 2004 election in which they favoured the left wing genius Kerry against the right wing buffoon Bush (who actually has a higher IQ and had a higher SAT score and Yale GPA than Kerry but facts never get in the way of the demonization of the right by then loony left) and W. overcame their bias, bile and BS and won the popular vote by 3% and also the electoral college.

- This time I won't be putting my money where my mouth is but I have a purely unscientific hunch that a combination of the greater enthusiasm of the GOP base this time and the higher percentage of independent voters favouring Romney will help Mitt to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat and win by 2-4% in the popular vote and 310-330 vs 228-208 in the electoral college. Certainly not a huge win or even a large win like BO's 2008 victory four years ago today but a win nonethless.

- But don't put money on this!

- I certainly won't.
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
cool a brand new thread spewing the same ol same ol
YAWN

- Thank you for your usual intelligent, thoughtful and uniquely original and valuable contribution to this thread.

- I always expect nothing less from you and certainly nothing more.

- But hey, here's a thought ... If you are tired of reading election posts because reading always makes your lips and fingers tired, THEN DON'T F'ING READ THEM.

- There is no need to be a moron and waste time posting to tell us that you think the thread is a waste of time. You see, unlike the little girl tired of watching Romney and Obama on TV all the time, you aren't forced by your parents to watch whatever shows they are watching. Or are you?
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
While I don't want to come across being as ridiculous



You think your normal retarded is better than just ridiculous?

- taxslave ... I'm sure you speak about retardation from long personal experience so I shall not engage you in the childish prattle you are trying to instigate with your retarded comment. Come back if you ever have anything intelligent or original or even coherent to offer.

BTW ... Is it true you are a conservative as one of your fellow miscreants and misfits here claimed the other day that you were? If so, I may have to reconsider the attractions of the NDP aka the Notoriously Dumb Party.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
cool a brand new thread spewing the same ol same ol
YAWN

My thoughts exactly!

Just how many election threads has Ballsack started now all with the exact same rhetoric? I think the mods could at least merge of of TB's threads if not all the election threads.

On another note....WTF Teddy? There are like 3 or 4 eligible voting Americans on this entire forum and I don't think you are changing anybody's vote. Give it a rest man!
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
- Thank you for your usual intelligent, thoughtful and uniquely original and valuable contribution to this thread.

- I always expect nothing less from you and certainly nothing more.
Like I said, the same ol same ol gibberish from you.

- But hey, here's a thought ... If you are tired of reading election posts because reading always makes your lips and fingers tired, THEN DON'T F'ING READ THEM.
I didn't read your OP. It was simply in my way when I was cruising throught the "new posts page". So you flatter yourself for nothing.

- There is no need to be a moron and waste time posting to tell us that you think the thread is a waste of time.
Hadn't thought about the waste of time angle. But you have a point. I was really referring to the redundancy of threads. But I am not surprised you haven't the capacity to understand that.
You see, unlike the little girl tired of watching Romney and Obama on TV all the time, you aren't forced by your parents to watch whatever shows they are watching. Or are you?
Nope, but then my parents' tv is no more and even if they were still alive, their tv wouldn't be in my face like your moronic, redundant, and partisan propaganda. :)
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Part of this is right, there has been a lot of nonsense on both sides in this election that is
agreed. It started right after Obama got elected when the House vowed their number one
goal was to defeat him. How do you compromise after that?
It should be pointed out once again for those who are having trouble understanding the
underlying and fundamental problem faced by Obama. The previous administration utterly
destroyed the economy with their buddies in Transnational Corporate America.
This economy has to be rebuilt it was every bit as bad as the Great Depression and it was
averted at least for now. Secondly a nation cannot stand still while fixing one problem, the
nation has to continue to be progressive, and this America's case they had to be brought
into the twentieth century on Medicare while we are living in the twenty first century.
Every other nation in the industrial world and some in the third have a proper medicare
system. The American people I believe will do the right thing and vote Obama for President.
If not America will become a back water in history.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
cool a brand new thread spewing the same ol same ol
YAWN

Oh yeah! I was just thinking we haven't seen one of these in hours!

While I don't want to come across being as ridiculous



You think your normal retarded is better than just ridiculous?

What's really ridiculous is that he thinks people actually read his posts.

BTW, blind partisanship like yours is an enemy of rational objectivity.

Partisanship is bad enough but blind partisanship is the biggest problem with politics, at any level, today. It's easy to criticize the politician that doesn't represent your point of view, but it's moronic not to criticize the one that does. It's also lazy. Forget objectivity, blind bipartisanship demonstrates a complete lack of not only understanding politics but caring about it in the first place. Only fools trust politicians blindly.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Like the poster said if you don't like polyticks why is you reedin any? The more vacuous the better, that is the rule with American politics. Of course they didn't invent it they just excel at it. I would be surprised if grecian formula had not contributed heavily to American political choice. Not to forget corn dogs and pancake breakfasts and licking babies surly all of these have contributed mightily. Of course imaginary policy plays it's very real part. I'm quite sure this will be the last American election so we should sit back and watch histories reward for stupidity unfold like it damn well should. I can't remember any bald presidents.
 
Last edited:

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
BTW ... Is it true you are a conservative as one of your fellow miscreants and misfits here claimed the other day that you were? If so, I may have to reconsider the attractions of the NDP aka the Notoriously Dumb Party.
Teddy, you're so far out in right field, if this were a ball game you'd be stamping parking tickets in the lot. In San Francisco you'd be kayaking in McCovey Cove.

taxslave is definitely a more conservative Canadian than some of the others posting here. Though he has a rather unremarkable gift that most of us have, in that we don't automatically label dissenting posters as being any brand or generic of "others."