TheGuy's repeating theme Threads, that're all on the same tangent, merged here.

[Omicron]

Indeed, it's doesn't have "weight" per se, but don't forget that it still has momentum, and therefore can exert pressure as it bounces off something like a mirror. Photon pressure on the earth at noon is about equal to the gravitational force of one layer of hexane.

One of the freakiest designs I ever saw for a fusion bomb was a tritium rod encased in a shell of plutonium.

When the fission step was triggered, photons would press in on the tritium rod and the fusion stage would ignite purely from photon pressure... not heat... *pressure*.

 

[TheGuy]

The TRUTH is not up to you, no matter how much you want it to be..

I am someone who observes the FACTS

The TRUTH is that some things are a matter of opinion and some are NOT..

Those things that are NOT which you decide are, are your delusions and LIES and presumptions..

It often depends on the context or view point that you take..

From hill A the town looks like a horse shoe
From hill B the town looks like an line..

Just because you stand on hill B, and see a line, does not mean that the horse shoe that I see from hill A is FALSE or nonexistant or untrue..

It just means that the town is both a line and a horse shoe at the same time neither is FALSE, they are both equeally true..

It is CDN BEAR that insists that it is a LINE because he sees a line, and he is entitled to that opinion, and I have no right to insist that it is a horse shoe because I am forcing my TRUTH on him..

It it he that will not entitle me to my opinion.. it is his opinion that I force my truth on him and others, and it is exactly the opposite of this that is the TRUTH..

 

[CDNBear]

The TRUTH is not up to you, no matter how much you want it to be..

That's not what you've said.

I am someone who observes the FACTS

Then believes what you want anyways. Despite what the facts might indicate.

The TRUTH is that some things are a matter of opinion and some are NOT..

I agree.

Those things that are NOT which you decide are, are your delusions and LIES and presumptions..

I agree, your posts are full of lies and presumptions.

It is CDN BEAR that insists that it is a LINE because he sees a line, and he is entitled to that opinion, and I have no right to insist that it is a horse shoe because I am forcing my TRUTH on him..

I didn't insist it was a line. Please quote me.

It it he that will not entitle me to my opinion..

Where have I tried to stop you from having an opinion? Quote me please.

it is his opinion that I force my truth on him and others, and it is exactly the opposite of this that it the TRUTH..

That is not my opinion at all. Please quote me.

 

[DaSleeper]

The energizer bunny is back:lol:

 

[TheGuy]

You are not having a disscussion you are harrassing me..

 

[CDNBear]

You are not having a disscussion you are harrassing me..

No, I'm replying to your posts.

If you post, he will come...

 

[TheGuy]

Just because one can take on another perspective(point of view) does not establish the first perspective false or untrue..


If you are evil and I am good, that is a matter of opinion.. and cannot be established as a FACT or a TRUTH..

But the fact that there exists the concepts of GOOD and EVIL is a FACT and cannot be argued as nonexistant..

 

[CDNBear]

Just because one can take on another perspective(point of view) does not establish the first perspective false or untrue..

True, but it would be nice if you were consistent.

If you are evil and I am good, that is a matter of opinion.. and cannot be established as a FACT or a TRUTH..

But yet you have labeled me and wished me harm.

But the fact that there exists the concepts of GOOD and EVIL is a FACT and cannot be argued as nonexistant..

Agreed, anyone that wishes harm on another, over a conversation on the net, is evil.

 

[TheGuy]

Explain to me what presumptuousness is...
Then
Explain to me what FAITH in the religious sense is..
and then let us compare..

 

[CDNBear]

Explain to me what presumptuousness is...
Then
Explain to me what FAITH in the religious sense is..
and then let us compare..

I'll continue, and answer all your challenges, when you've posted proof of your claims. That I asked you to provide proof for, in post 703.

 

[JLM]

Does the whole kit and caboodle combined warrant discussion?

 

[CDNBear]

Does the whole kit and caboodle combined warrant discussion?

Yes, I actually think so.

But then everyone involved has to be open to the idea, they may not have a lock on the right thought...

 

[TheGuy]

Is it TRUE that a person can have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that if one assumes that it is absolutely TRUE that God exists without proof, that they have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that you are refusing to have any reasonable discussion..

Is it TRUE that you say that you KNOW the TRUTH and I don't..

Is it TRUE that you are going to now PROVE in black and white that you are unwilling to have any reasonable discussion..



Or might it be that you will PROVE it with just WHITE..

 

[CDNBear]

Is it TRUE that a person can have a presumptuous opinion..

I already agreed you did.

Is it TRUE that if one assumes that it is absolutely TRUE that God exists without proof, that they have a presumptuous opinion..

But there is proof.

Is it TRUE that you are refusing to have any reasonable discussion..

Not at all.

Is it TRUE that you say that you KNOW the TRUTH and I don't..

Yes.

Is it TRUE that you are going to now PROVE in black and white that you are unwilling to have any reasonable discussion..

Nope, you already proved you are.

Or might it be that you will PROVE it with just WHITE..

You aren't that lucky.

 

[TheGuy]

What proof do you have that God exists..

{

Is it TRUE that you say that you KNOW the TRUTH and I don't..
​

Yes.
}

Thus it is YOU that is guilty, of what I was accused..

 

[CDNBear]

What proof do you have that God exists..

What proof do you have to support you accusations in you post, #702?

Thus it is YOU that is guilty, of what I was accused..

Not at all. I can actually back my sh!t up. All you do is talk in circles and avoid proving any of your claims.

 

[TheGuy]

What you said is not reasonably a logical argument to what I said, but is rather your irrelevant opinions, and is therefore NOT are reasonble disscussion..

 

[CDNBear]

What you said is not reasonably a logical argument to what I said, but is rather your irrelevant opinions, and is therefore NOT are reasonble disscussion..

Why do you refuse to prove your accusations, and instead move to make more?

If you admit your mistake, in post #702. We can move on.

 

[TheGuy]

So again

Explain to me what presumptuousness is...
Then
Explain to me what FAITH in the religious sense is..
and then let us compare..

Is it TRUE that a person can have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that if one assumes that it is absolutely TRUE that God exists without proof, that they have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that you are refusing to have any reasonable discussion..

 

[CDNBear]

So again

Explain to me what presumptuousness is...
Then
Explain to me what FAITH in the religious sense is..
and then let us compare..

Is it TRUE that a person can have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that if one assumes that it is absolutely TRUE that God exists without proof, that they have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that you are refusing to have any reasonable discussion..

So again...

Why do you refuse to prove your accusations, and instead move to make more?

If you admit your mistake, in post #702. We can move on.