The Tarriff Hype.

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
In response to Trump saying “we don’t need anything that Canada has,” U.S. Ambassador Hoekstra said there’s a “tremendous amount of things” America needs, citing potash used to produce fertilizer as an example.

“We need potash” Hoekstra said, “because there’s not lots of other places that you can get it.”
Historically, the U.S. President and Canadian Prime Minister meet in person an average of 2 to 4 times a year. Because of the deeply integrated bilateral relationship, these meetings range from formal state visits to informal pull-asides at recurring international summits.
1781654102509.jpegWhile the annual average sits comfortably around two to four, the frequency fluctuates based on personal chemistry, shifting global events, or intense trade negotiations. During times of crisis or massive legislative overhauls (such as the NAFTA to USMCA renegotiations), in-person summits and direct diplomatic contact increase significantly.

The formal joint review and potential renewal deadline for the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA/USMCA/NAFTA/SMEGMA/LMNOP) is July 1, 2026, though the July 1 date is not a termination "cliff". CUSMA remains in legal force and will not automatically expire, as its base term runs until July 1, 2036…but it is significant, and the auto sector is likely to be central in some of those trade talks.

Carney arrived at the summit in France with no confirmed bilateral meeting with Trump. The G7 meeting marks the first time the prime minister and the president have been in the same room together this year.

Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Chief Trade Negotiator Janice Charette met with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of the summit to build on the work that was accomplished during their meeting with Greer in Washington on June 2. When asked whether Greer considers Canada’s EV deal with China a U.S. trade irritant, the minister said “he hasn’t described that to me in those, in those contexts” adding that the U.S. is very public about their trade irritants with Canada…be they real or fictitious.🙄

Ahead of the G7 summit, Carney downplayed bringing up any potential issues of trade with the U.S. president, adding that the leaders’ focus would be primarily on geopolitical events.
(YouTube & Spike , Chester and Sylvester)
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Star exclusively reported Wednesday on the list of contentious trade irritants that are at the heart of U.S. concerns as the July 1 deadline looms for Canada, the U.S. and Mexico to declare their intentions about renewing the continental trade deal, known as CUSMA in Canada and USMCA in the United States.

If the three signatories don't declare an intention to renew the deal for another 16 years, a period of annual reviews would kick in, during which the pact would remain in force for another decade — unless any party gives the required six months’ notice to withdraw.
1781742510504.jpeg
Trump said that's clearly his preferred option at this time. "To me, I think it's better without it," he said. "I mean, to be honest with you, I'm not a big fan of it."

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) was primarily negotiated for the United States by then-U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and senior White House advisor Jared Kushner, operating under the administration of President Donald Trump, so why would he like it?

Trump's latest comments on the prospects of signing a new trade agreement go beyond his remarks last week, when he said he was "not looking to renew" the continental trade deal. On Wednesday, he also disputed the notion that the deal would nonetheless remain in force for another decade, saying, "I view it as possibly expiring immediately?” (???)
Asked by reporters to clarify what he meant by terminating the agreement, and if he meant allowing it to roll over into an annual process, Trump said, "I would rather not have the agreement, but I may sign it. But we do better as a country if we don't have an agreement.

Abandoning CUSMA (USMCA) would make America worse off economically, as a full termination of the continental trade agreement would disrupt $2.7 trillion in annual trade, destroy highly integrated cross-border supply chains, and invite retaliatory tariffs.

Without CUSMA’s protections, trading partners would be free to impose retaliatory tariffs on American exports. This would hurt U.S. farmers and manufacturers who rely on these major international markets.

CUSMA establishes predictable rules for intellectual property, digital trade, and labor. Eliminating these frameworks removes investment certainty for U.S. businesses, which can slow job growth, but that’s neither here nor there I guess.
While Trump did not specify on what measure the U.S. would "do better" without a North American free trade deal, there's plenty of evidence that CUSMA has helped fire up the U.S. economy.

Business Roundtable, an association of more than 200 chief executives of major U.S. companies, published a report that shows a 50 per cent increase in two-way trade in the region since the deal took effect, with 13 million U.S. jobs supported by trade with Canada and Mexico.

"Canada and Mexico purchase more U.S. manufactured goods than the next dozen U.S. trading partners combined and represent the top export markets for U.S. agricultural products," said Business Roundtable president Kristen Silverberg in an article for the Brookings Institution, a think-tank in Washington, D.C.
"The USMCA is the largest, fairest, most balanced, and modern trade agreement ever achieved. There’s never been anything like it," Trump told a signing ceremony in January 2020.

"This is a colossal victory for our farmers, ranchers, energy workers, factory workers and American workers in all 50 states," he said.

"The United States cannot withdraw from a congressionally approved trade agreement without the consent of Congress," concluded the Republican-led Senate Finance Committee in a 2020 report, and will Trump hold sway over Congress after November (?) or even leading up to November?
1781801791411.jpeg
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
At the time of its signing of the North American trilateral trade agreement during his first term, Trump called it the best trade agreement ever. The regional trade accord has seen the economic fortunes of all three nations rise exponentially. Moreover, at a time when inflation continues to outpace wages and Canada has entered a technical recession, choking off the flow of goods and services is a sure-fire way to exacerbate stagnant economic growth.

Despite President Trump’s best efforts to pummel the Great White North’s economy through weaponized tariffs, much of Canada’s (and Mexico’s) goods are immune to the import duties unleashed on the rest of the world by the White House. Now, staring down a truculent political base, an anemic economy and a massive failure on Iran, the White House should be frantic to change the narrative.

An extension of CUSMA is just the type of win that will pacify the president’s base, including the business sector. Yet, it remains clear, the American president is equally intransigent and less sanguine about securing the economic future of the nation, much less the region.

As evidence, look no further than the still closed Gordie Howe Bridge. A newly minted multi-billion project connecting Ontario to Michigan, it’s meant to ease congestion and allow for easier transport and flow of billions in goods and services across the two nations. However, this seismic and badly needed engine of progress remains shut down as the Trump administration continues to put up barriers that not only harm a once-close ally but also extracts a heavy price on American businesses and jobs.
"Canada and Mexico purchase more U.S. manufactured goods than the next dozen U.S. trading partners combined and represent the top export markets for U.S. agricultural products," said Business Roundtable president Kristen Silverberg in an article for the Brookings Institution, a think-tank in Washington, D.C.
The Business Roundtable, an association of more than 200 chief executives of major U.S. companies, published a report that shows a 50 per cent increase in two-way trade in the region since the deal took effect, with 13 million U.S. jobs supported by trade with Canada and Mexico.

Not surprisingly, President Trump continues to double down on rhetoric suggesting the U.S. will walk away from the landmark agreement. Seemingly ignoring the economic malaise caused by his war of choice in Iran, Trump fails to account for his reckless military offensive in the Middle East which ultimately gave Tehran outsized leverage forcing his administration to accept a politically untenable deal.

Yet despite the braggadocio, the desperation was apparent, which is why it is highly likely Trump will eventually cave on his grandiosity and relinquish to an extension of CUSMA. But not before causing tremendous levels of angst and frustration.

At a press conference outlining his reasons behind the Iran deal, Trump said: “…rather than having your favorite president be Herbert Hoover, he was always the one I didn’t want to be…I didn’t want to see economic catastrophe. If you kept this going, that could have happened…”

If the war was a glidepath to “economic catastrophe,” walking away from CUSMA will lead to equally calamitous consequences. Perhaps that is why Canada’s prime minister offered a hand of support. Unfortunately, where Trump often remains consistent is in biting the hand that feeds him.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
July 1 is the deadline for all three parties involved in the trade pact to decide whether to renew the deal for another 16 years, withdraw from the agreement altogether, or start an annual rolling review process that could last years…so…you’d ‘think’ there would be a trilateral meeting before Canada Day on July 1st, right?

In a statement to CTV News, the spokesperson said Leblanc is looking forward to meeting with his U.S. and Mexican counterparts on July 1 (on the day of the deadline), “as prescribed in the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement.”(?)
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
July 1 is the deadline for all three parties involved in the trade pact to decide whether to renew the deal for another 16 years, withdraw from the agreement altogether, or start an annual rolling review process that could last years…so…you’d ‘think’ there would be a trilateral meeting before Canada Day on July 1st, right?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Trump wants Carney to ditch Canada’s supply management system and open the dairy market to more U.S. dairy farmers. While Canada abandoned its Digital Services Tax as a concession last year — getting nothing in return — Washington also wants Ottawa to drop the Online News Act and Online Streaming Act, which it sees as unfairly protectionist.
“In a post on Truth Social, Trump said: “Numerous European Countries have been discussing the imminent implementation of a Digital Services Tax on American Companies. Some of these Countries are close to actually doing this. Please let this statement serve to represent that any Country that imposes such a Tax will immediately be met with a 100 per cent TARIFF on any and all Goods sent to the United States of America.
1782563733566.jpeg
“This TARIFF will supersede Trade Deals made with the Country, whether implemented, signed, or not. Additionally, the 100 per cent TARIFF will be immediately imposed, if they proceed.”
The threat could set off another saga in Trump’s global trade war, in which he has placed drastic tariffs on countries and economic blocs at once. If Trump followed through on his warning, it could set off a larger trade war between the US and EU if the 27-country economic bloc felt compelled to retaliate to the tariff hike.

Trump’s threats came as his 4 July deadline for the EU and US to start implementing a tariff deal looms. In May, the EU signed a trade deal with the US which caps most tariffs on EU imports at 15% – a deal that came after months of wrangling and tensions between the two sides.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Trump has repeatedly stated that the era of free trade is over, and some baseline level of tariffs is the starting point of any deal. He's busy replacing one wave of tariffs struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court with others.

Although Trump slapped a range of global tariffs on allies and foes alike, most Canadian exports that comply with the CUSMA's rules of origin, particularly for North American content, are exempt. However, sector-specific tariffs remain on industries important to Canada, like autos, steel, aluminum and lumber. There are still big issues, (up to 50 per cent tariffs on) aluminum, steel, automobiles and softwood lumber specifically," he said, before adding that it's been "clear for a while" the whole thing will take more time.

“At the insistence of the Americans — who came to the negotiating table during President Donald Trump's first term demanding a hard stop or expiration date for an agreement — the deal signed in 2018 built in a series of possible reviews. It was a concession without which, two former Canadian officials told the Star, a deal would never have been reached. ”

A virtual three-way meeting is expected to last from mid-morning to before noon. No media scrums before. No joint news conferences after. No rah-rah. Ottawa may release an official statement early in the afternoon.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
we are going to get buttfucked with terroriffs. 💡 :(
July 1 is the deadline for all three parties involved in the trade pact to decide whether to renew the deal for another 16 years, withdraw from the agreement altogether, or start an annual rolling review process that could last years…so…you’d ‘think’ there would be a trilateral meeting before Canada Day on July 1st, right?
This will end up being negotiated and toyed with annually until at least into 2029. Also, the "Fortress North America" concept cannot simultaneously work and advantage all three nations if the U.S. imposes unilateral tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods. For the continental bloc to benefit all three countries, North American trade policies must be fundamentally reciprocal.

The primary vision of "Fortress North America" relies on zero tariffs between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico to build an integrated manufacturing bloc capable of countering overseas competitors. Imposing U.S. tariffs on these neighbors directly undermines this by disrupting continental supply chains.

A working fortress requires unified external tariffs (often targeting Chinese or European goods). Under current U.S. trade objectives, this effectively means Canada and Mexico adopting U.S. trade policies, which limits their ability to negotiate independent deals globally.

However, this alignment is a concession to economic leverage. It acts as a defensive strategy to minimize economic damage and avoid a complete breakdown of agreements like the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement, even though it sacrifices sovereign trade policy to appease U.S. demands.

“There’s light at the end of the trade tunnel, there’s enormous benefit to the U.S. in keeping a Fortress North America mindset,” said former Republican House Leader Paul Ryan in an interview last week in Calgary, where he met with business leaders as vice-chairman of consulting firm Teneo. “What you don’t want to do is deliberately antagonize the president.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Mr. Trump, who in January indicated he planned to use “economic forceto coerce Canadians into agreeing to be annexed by the U.S. as the “51st state,” is continuing to pile new tariff threats on Canada – levies that by all accounts would stack or apply on top of each other.
“There’s light at the end of the trade tunnel, there’s enormous benefit to the U.S. in keeping a Fortress North America mindset,” said former Republican House Leader Paul Ryan in an interview last week in Calgary, where he met with business leaders as vice-chairman of consulting firm Teneo. “What you don’t want to do is deliberately antagonize the president.
The Trump administration has embraced tariffs not as tactical measures but as instruments of national strategy. Under the banner of “economic statecraft,” Washington is recalibrating global trade—chiefly to counter China—and expecting its continental allies to fall in line while also being punished with tariffs imposed upon them by the Trump administration.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,535
11,750
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Fuck 'em both.
They're both Epstein pedofile class global parasite swine.
…And the twists in the truth are blatant. The U.S. typically imports more in cars and auto parts from both Canada and Mexico than it exports to them, & relies heavily on Canadian crude oil, creating a massive goods deficit ‘in that area,’ though the U.S. generally enjoys an energy surplus with Mexico and yet it (America) maintains surpluses in certain sectors like exporting natural gas and gasoline to Mexico, or running a general surplus in services across both nations…but that’s not being mentioned.

What’s also not being mentioned is that the US has a population greater than double Mexico and Canada combined, and yet Canada in Mexico are the top importers of American goods on the planet…with the third largest being China…and again individually Canada or Mexico imports more than twice as much in American goods then China does.
1782944331730.jpeg
Economists generally agree that trade deficits are the natural result of consumer demand and global supply chain integration rather than deceptive practices. American consumers continuously purchase goods (such as vehicles, auto parts, and agriculture) produced in Canada and Mexico, which skews the balance. Mr. Trump said he plans to let the pact expire because American citizens “don’t need anything” from Canada or Mexico.

“But they need everything that we have to treat us better,” he said of the North American partners. “We don’t need their cars. We don’t need their lumber. We don’t need their energy. We don’t need anything.”
The treaty, which replaced the North American free-trade agreement (NAFTA) in 2020 and sets out the rules for continental trade, remains in force. Likewise, the U.S. tariff carve-out for Canadian and Mexican goods that comply with USMCA rules of origin remains in place.

“Without a 16-year extension, the agreement moves into a period of annual reviews that will last for a decade. Technically, this is an exit ramp. If no extension agreement is reached by 2036, the USMCA will expire. However, there will be plenty of opportunities to reach an agreement before that final deadline.

Most Canadian exports will continue to enter the U.S. tariff-free, while certain sectors – namely steel, aluminum, copper, metal derivative products, automobiles, lumber, furniture, etc…will continue to face hefty U.S. tariffs of between 25 per cent and 50 per cent.

At the same time the Trump administration also wants more co-ordination between the three countries on external tariffs, particularly on China. And it has suggested it wants both countries to pay more attention to the sources of capital, with the goal of reducing Chinese investment in North America under the banner of “economic security.”

Mexico & Canada want relief from U.S. sectoral tariffs; the preservation of the tariff carve-out for goods that comply with USMCA rules of origin; and some sense of stability in U.S. tariff policy.