...realistically, every one of those examples, despite the lack of details, can be ascribed to misperception, misunderstanding, imaginings, wishful thinking, and other such things.
You have gone too far in your may be's and probabilities. This is understood: the stable every day psychology needs to be steady; but this is wrong.
I tell you how: I have some observations that I myself understood as not realistic. But such observations that I told you: no, they are true.
A properly hung and balanced door, for instance, will move in a very slight draft, it doesn't require anything you'd feel as a wind.
The door: it was not hung as do you say; everyday observation of this man does not notice anything similar to it in his house, only when some of his children moved it.
The story about your friend fearing his brother had died and then finding out that he did is confirmation bias and selective thinking. How many times had he had a bad feeling about a loved one that turned out to be false? People don't remember that kind of information, they just remember coincidences that seem to be significant, but without that information, you don't have the complete dataset, you can't conclude anything from that.
The brother of my friend: he was intact and healthy and strong in built; young: about 20-30 years old. The idea came to him, and he surprised and sought the protection of God from the suggestion of Satan concerning this subject, which was strange, and later on someone came and told him: that his brother died.
This has nothing to do with some bad feeling turned to be false: no such anticipation of the brother's death was felt before; he was safe and healthy; his death was unexpected at all.
Under very poor lighting conditions through a window you saw something white that appeared to be moving along a path and interpreted it as being the ghost of your father. That might be pareidolia, it might be wishful thinking, it might have been a reflective or refractive effect on the window glass of a passing vehicle's lights, you don't have enough information to conclude it must have been the ghost of your father. Your 15-year old son jumping in to support you after your uncle and brother said it was nothing, well, that hardly needs explanation, assuming you're a good father and your son loves and respects you, which I do.
The ghost supposed to be of my father: it was not something white passing across the window; no, it was a man that passed before our sight along the path toward the kitchen, the door of which was locked. I described him in details to you: I did not see his face, only the broad shoulders and trunk, while my son sitting to my left side, he saw his face blurred with whiteness, as he said.
Moreover, my son (15 years old at that time) does not lie even for my behalf; he tells the truth to any side, even though against me. For he knew the Quran aya 4: 135
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ كُونُواْ قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاء لِلّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَى أَنفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالأَقْرَبِينَ إِن يَكُنْ غَنِيًّا أَوْ فَقَيرًا فَاللّهُ أَوْلَى بِهِمَا فَلاَ تَتَّبِعُواْ الْهَوَى أَن تَعْدِلُواْ وَإِن تَلْوُواْ أَوْ تُعْرِضُواْ فَإِنَّ اللّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرًا
The explanation:
(O believers, be 'upright and leaders' for justice, witnesses for [the sake of] God; [so say the true witness] even though it be against yourselves or [your] parents and [your] kinsmen.
Whether [the man] be rich or poor, God – surely – is more [than you] Worthy of either.
So do not follow [your] desires that you may not [witness] in justice.
But if you twist [your tongues to distort the testimony] or turn away [from saying the witness], then [surely] God is Most Aware of what you do.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, I did not anticipate my father at all; when I saw his frame, I thought he was my brother who is very similar to his father, even his voice: Glory be to God!
While my uncle and brother: they had their backs to the window, and they did not see that scene.
You already believed in the reality of ghosts and spirits before any of these things happened, and you've many times shown yourself willing, even eager, to accept a supernatural explanation of events when there are perfectly ordinary explanations available.
Yes, I believe in the afterlife, angels and souls and the Creator of this World and the afterlife; but I should not lie, neither should I say there is nothing about the souls and afterlife, only to declare myself scientific.
Even when your claims are easily falsified, like all the junk science threads you've started here based on Al-Hilly's interpretation of the Quran, you cling to the supernatural explanations, and you trust your memory and perceptions far more than you should. They're notoriously unreliable, that's why scientific procedures have such elaborate safeguards against errors in memory and perception. They're not like recordings, they're subject to additions and excisions and modifications and reconstructions over time to conform to other beliefs and values and what people want to be true, these things are well documented.
Concerning Al-Hilly, read what he said in the link that I gave you about the conditions for the inspiring of the soul; while angels have more capability than souls in this respect; angels can inspire man in the street or in his office.
man-after-death.t35.com/1.htm#[_How_Can_souls_inspire_us_]_
I also encountered some personal experience that is somewhat similar; but here the reply has become long.
I simply do not believe you're a reliable witness, your biases are too obvious.
As I said: I should not lie, neither should I say there is nothing about the souls and afterlife, only to declare myself scientific.
man-after-death.t35.com