So well revealing his character in a private conversation , what did he say that was untrue ?
The 'Official' Quit Picking On Trump Thread
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
A bunch of off colour banter is not an indication of character. A smart person can tell when to be frivolous and when to be serious. I'm sure even Hillary would agree with that.
Blog: If you think Donald Trump?s comments are vulgar, check out Hillary?s potty mouth
I can't support him , I do however wonder why you won't answer my question and explain exactly what was so wrong about Trump's remarks ?
Are there not a lot of women that a celebrity could just walk up and kiss ?
Are there not a lot of women that are so awed by the rich and famous that they would let anything go by these rich and famous ?
Were would the Playboy mansion find it's women if not .
Wrong? Nothing. Just another brick in the wall.
But I see you're still at the tactic of taking Trump's f*ckups one at a time and refusing to deal with the concept of "pattern of practice and behavior." Tres clever.
And a lot of men. Don't make it any less sexual assault when you "walk up and kiss" (don't that sound so much nicer than "grab by the p*ssy?" Nice rephrase there) somebody that don't want you to.
I think Trump would be excellent as the new master of the Playboy empire.
But you keep right ahead on dodging and ducking the fact that he's running for President, mmm-kay?
He was just a celebrity reality t v star at the time . And of course saying that a rich celebrity can walk up and start kissing certain women is the same as actually doing it . Right Mr. internet lawyer .Who cares if he is running for president or dog catcher .
Oh, right, I forgot. Nothing about a candidate's past can be brought into the campaign. Leastways not when the candidate in question is Trump.
But I see you're getting agitated enough to go with the ad hominem you can't possibly prove, so I calculate what little value you ever add to a discussion is pretty much down the drain. Y'all have a real nice day now, hear?
Yup you to , if a lawyer can't distinguish the difference between actions and words she is not much of a lawyer . Have a nice day now ya hear .
Yep, but I question whether she's good at it. I would characterize her as being "as transparent as glass"...............that supercilious simper would be my first clue.
I am qualified in judging internet lawyers though . Look at you a woman indian Washington D.C. lawyer who spends her days trolling Canadian content . Nope to me just a voice on the internet , no different than any other voice .
I fyou were a real lawyer you would have actual work to preform .
No problem, I'm pretty happy with my income.On the other side of the coin pgs, at their hourly stipend a couple of hours a day would allow them to live pretty handsomely allowing them to spend 6 or 10 hours on the I/N. Sorry Bones- that's the way it is in Canada anyway.
Still a little interested in the incisive analytical process that pgs used in determining that I'm a woman.
Betcha it was the ponies.
Picking on Trump will never end. Every second work on the air is 'Trump'.
There is just as much filth in Clinton's past as there is in Trump's but the media protects its Axx by burying it. Not a word about her past indiscretions; any time someone tries to being it up the moderator immediately cuts in and silences them.
Disgraceful! There's no such thing as objective journalism anymore. It's all personal opinion and propaganda.
There is just as much filth in Clinton's past as there is in Trump's but the media protects its Axx by burying it. Not a word about her past indiscretions; any time someone tries to being it up the moderator immediately cuts in and silences them.
Disgraceful! There's no such thing as objective journalism anymore. It's all personal opinion and propaganda.