Yeah.... According to some folks, it's all black or white. If you're not for them you're against them. It's nicer to live in a much more colourful world....
Woof!
The neoconning of a nation
- Thread starter Avro
- Start date
Yeah.... According to some folks, it's all black or white. If you're not for them you're against them. It's nicer to live in a much more colourful world....
Woof!
Thats because you are being deliberately obtuse.
Seriously.
If I say "If you live by the sword you die by the sword" do you also assume I am talking about both you (as an individual) and the usage of swords in your day to day lives?
That that is your ultimate defense says alot about how much you really know about your position.
I find it wierd you think that death is an acceptable response to "They wouldn't listen to me and were really bugging me"
I think thats bullcrap, up there with "I hit her because she wouldn't leave me alone"
Zorch, you are sounding more and more like you are sending from the loonie bin all the time. Perhaps it would help with your communication skills if you (meaning YOU) learned to identify to and about whom you speak?
Woof!
Woof!
Perhaps you should learn English before commenting on its use.
you
yə/Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[yoo; unstressed yoo, yuh]Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciationpronoun, possessive your or yours, objective you, plural you; noun, plural yous.
–pronoun
1.the pronoun of the second person singular or plural, used of the person or persons being addressed, in the nominative or objective case: You are the highest bidder. It is you who are to blame. We can't help you. This package came for you. Did she give you the book?
2.one; anyone; people in general: a tiny animal you can't even see.
3.(used in apposition with the subject of a sentence, sometimes repeated for emphasis following the subject): You children pay attention. You rascal, you!
4.Informal. (used in place of the pronoun your before a gerund): There's no sense in you getting upset.
Seriously, don't make your defense to an arguement that you are "confused by poor wording", if in fact the wording is correct and you just have nothing to add to the conversation.
you
–pronoun
1.the pronoun of the second person singular or plural, used of the person or persons being addressed, in the nominative or objective case: You are the highest bidder. It is you who are to blame. We can't help you. This package came for you. Did she give you the book?
2.one; anyone; people in general: a tiny animal you can't even see.
3.(used in apposition with the subject of a sentence, sometimes repeated for emphasis following the subject): You children pay attention. You rascal, you!
4.Informal. (used in place of the pronoun your before a gerund): There's no sense in you getting upset.
Seriously, don't make your defense to an arguement that you are "confused by poor wording", if in fact the wording is correct and you just have nothing to add to the conversation.
Okay ... now you're just conflicting with yourself in a feeble attempt at spin doctoring. Actually, the confusion arises when first you (meaning YOU) are speaking to me, then you (meaning YOU) are speaking in general terms with a collective YOU. It's sort of like using turn signals and why you (collective YOU) have brake lights. Give it up, Zorch. You are sunk!
BTW ... am I being obtuse because I fail understand you, or because I don't agree that Israel is persecuted?
Woof!
BTW ... am I being obtuse because I fail understand you, or because I don't agree that Israel is persecuted?
Woof!
Last edited:
No, your obtuse because your arguement, again, falls down to trying to misinterpret the word "You"
You didn't say anything about the message was incorrect, only my presentation. Turns out the presentation is correct however.
So lets go back and I'll put in helpful hints for those with English as a second language.
"If you (any nation or group) choose not to trust it fine, but if you(any nation or group) started the war and you(any nation or group) refuse to end it. So don't cry when you(any nation or group) are in it."
Syria is involved in massacres and invading foreign countries to annex territories.
You didn't say anything about the message was incorrect, only my presentation. Turns out the presentation is correct however.
So lets go back and I'll put in helpful hints for those with English as a second language.
"If you (any nation or group) choose not to trust it fine, but if you(any nation or group) started the war and you(any nation or group) refuse to end it. So don't cry when you(any nation or group) are in it."
Syria is involved in massacres and invading foreign countries to annex territories.
Zzarchov feels I'm sure that if Hilary decides (should this person attain the office of the President{which I strongly doubt} that it would be entirely appropriate for the u.s. to invade Iran and if TPB decide...obliterate that nation because Israel has a straw up it's ass and the levers and wheels to indulge their form of terrorism via their proxy the u.s.
I'd like to see Israel wiped off the face of the earth, not because I harbor any hatred for Jews or the Judaic religion, but because that appears to be the only workable solution to the problems in that region of the world. Why doesn't the u.s. offer every Israeli free entry and assisted immigration and empty out that little blister on the worlds arse and let whatever happens happen?
Many reasons of course but the principle reason is because Israel and the people of that nation would then fulfill their status as the world's pariah unable unfit and unsuited to manage their own future.
I'd like to see Israel wiped off the face of the earth, not because I harbor any hatred for Jews or the Judaic religion, but because that appears to be the only workable solution to the problems in that region of the world. Why doesn't the u.s. offer every Israeli free entry and assisted immigration and empty out that little blister on the worlds arse and let whatever happens happen?
Many reasons of course but the principle reason is because Israel and the people of that nation would then fulfill their status as the world's pariah unable unfit and unsuited to manage their own future.
Mikey, this is hatred. It belies your claim of having nothing against Jews. Open your eyes, man.....a little self-examination is in order.
Zorch: If you (meaning YOU) want to get nit-picky about utilizaion of the English language, the second word into your post is incorrect as you are trying to say "you are" which contracts to you're. Your is a possessive term.
Sad how one has to resort to the pettiest of terms in attempts to reach through brainwash into little mindsful of propaganda. There is hope for you....
When we first started our discussion, we were referring to each others' points of view - re: 1974 Israeli violations of a cease-fire. Then, without notice, you switched to abstract "YOU". Now, I am obtuse? Are you Israel?
Enjoy....
Wolf
Last edited:
I'd like to see Israel wiped off the face of the earth, not because I harbor any hatred for Jews or the Judaic religion, but because that appears to be the only workable solution to the problems
-------------------------------------------MikeyDB----------------------------------------------
I can see you need a spanking.
After both your buttocks are raw from the necessary treatment, shake it all off and then speak to us.
But keep it pithy and go wise.
-------------------------------------------MikeyDB----------------------------------------------
I can see you need a spanking.
After both your buttocks are raw from the necessary treatment, shake it all off and then speak to us.
But keep it pithy and go wise.
What about the other problem with Israel gone of Jordanians and Egyptian ethnic's (aka West Bank and Gaza or Fatah and Hamas) fighting for the region?
Not to mention the Shia (such as Hezbollah) and Sunni fighting, seeing as they would have massive militaries.
Right now Israel (odd as it sounds ) is a massive force of peace in the region. All of these disparate groups are actually working togethor for a common goal (genocide of the Jewish population).
Once Israel is gone, there is no need for them to work togethor on their next goal, whiping out each other.
This has been shown time and time again in similar circumstances in human history.
Look at the Balkans, look whats starting to happen to south africa post-aparatheid, look at what happened in Iran once the shah was kicked out (not alot of secular democrats in Iran anymore is there? surprising the Islamic hardliners turned on them when the Shah was out of the picture)
Your being naive if you think it would out differently with so many vastly different militant factions (with very different goals) surrounding Israel.