It's a fu cking fishing expedition for you....dumba$$..... and he's had you on the "hook" for 2 days now. and so far..... you are the ONLY one on this board that doesn't realize it. Can you be any more dense?
The Intermittent Little Ice Age
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
It's a fu cking fishing expedition for you....dumba$$..... and he's had you on the "hook" for 2 days now. and so far..... you are the ONLY one on this board that doesn't realize it. Can you be any more dense?
oh wait... do you mean member Locutus went to the trouble in creating a whole separate thread for his linked reference... where he refuses to state what point(s) he intended to make with his C&P... and the best you can come up with in your declared "obviousness", is that his refusal comes down to "he's fishing"?
you mean, in your declared "it's soooooo obvious", you weren't implying the obvious points had nothing to do with the article itself? Is that your fallback when you're pressed, repeatedly pressed, to state your declared obvious point(s)?
it's a most telling reflection on deniers, like you, that when pressed to actually state what intent was behind a C&P linked reference, one provided verbatim without any additional commentary/qualification, the best deniers can do is... claim they were just fishing? Oh my!
do you have a decipher on how to interpret Locutus' posts?... since all his posts are simply direct verbatim C&P quotes, where he adds nothing subject related of his own commentary, what's the clue to ascertain when member Locutus "means it" and when he's "just fishing"? I mean, you said the point was soooooooo obvious, what clued you in and what should we look for in the next upcoming member Locutus direct verbatim C&P quoted post to know if he's "just fishing"?
ya see, there's an avenue to take legitimate discussion of that Locutus C&P linked article... but I'm certainly not going to presume on what member Locutus intended with it. So I asked, repeatedly asked. But Locutus doesn't do anything but C&P... apparently, he has no subject related thoughts of his own! And you being the doofus you are, you were "had" in showcasing just how much of a lapdog you truly are! I guess in your denier world, one is to assume what is intended/meant and discuss/argue with oneself!
as for your fake-outrage over the denier label, unless I'm confusing you with another like-guy here, I gave you the opportunity to state your position - you refused; you repeatedly refused. Sort of a pattern with you, hey! Based on a couple of your posts I labeled you a denier and said quite emphatically, if you would state your position, and it ran counter to my labeling of you, I would retract it and offer you an apology. And I only did this because you had a meltdown over it. You had such a meltdown and said so much, apparently, you had no words left to actually state your position. Go figure, hey. Of course, I can give you the same opportunity... again, here: simply state your position on GW/AGW/CC. I look forward to you actually responding this time!
this new-fish spastic has boss-level bait in his mouth. next to brent butts he's the most easily played chump on the world wide web.
like I said, your linked OP has an avenue for legitimate discussion; however it takes an interpretation of the originating author's intent in regards today's relatively recent warming, but more pointedly, an interpretation of your intent in posting yet another of your C&P gems! Since you never post any of your own subject related commentary, how does one interpret your intent, particularly if not self-evident within the linked article.
you claim you were "playing members" with this dedicated thread of yours! Is that the respect you have for the membership? In the face of your refusal to state your intent... and actually interpret the article (not just C&P it)... I guess you've got nothing else to fall-back on but to claim "you were fishing"! Locutus, the fisher!
and you've now been told by Locutus himself that you have been played. That this OP was solely a fishing expedition with you as the prize catch. Yet, here you are, trying to make it something it isn't. Trying to "save face" as it were. Something it is far too late to do.
The following is what I like to call an 'InfoPost':
hey new fish...you seem to think this is about other members or even one other member...you're an idiot.
I own you, you alone and all your gibberish on this forum...your weak will and sociopathic tendencies are the e-death of you and your ilk.
besides regurgitating warmist propaganda like a good little boy, you must continue to be seen as engaging this membership so as not to lose face. to cease would bring further shame. same as our flaky little friend there ricky bobby.
you were outed as a mentalfloss invitee by yours truly. *deep bow*
you sheepishly place on ignore those you know you have no chance at good contest with; your superiors here.
your fight is neither funky nor strong.
it is hilarious to watch an import troll flail and twitch and bemoan and fist-clench.
you are a joke.
you're funny; like a clown; you amuse us.
that's the only reason you're still here.
protip: most of the time I can't be bothered responding to you because you are not as important as you think you are, certainly not important to me, not very valid and a bit of a dork. you are not worthy of much of my time. just so we're clear eh.
I'm Bad.
hey now...have a swell day friend. :smile:
Last edited:
well what else has Locutus got! He clearly can't articulate a single thought of his own... that is clearly why his forte is blindly linking to C&P articles, typically sourced from his stable of go-to denier blogs (oh... and twitter feeds!)
yet again, there is an avenue for legitimate discussion of that OP linked article. Member Locutus now CLAIMS he was just putting on any members that bothered to actually read and contemplate it! :mrgreen: Of course that's what Locutus would claim... what else has he got when his C&P bullshyte is called out so directly?
you're floundering in your own lapdoggyess! Like I said/asked, going forward, what is the clue to deciphering any Locutus C&P post... they're all the same! He adds not word one of his own subject related commentary... he simply is a parrot... he quotes (C&P) verbatim from his gems! How does a guy know if Locutus means "whatever he means" with his C&P... how does a guy know if he's, Locutus the Fisher... or not!!!
Fu ck man, how deep you want to dig yourself in? There is no one here, aside from mentalfloss, that thinks you are worth "debating" with you. You ARE a mental midget. Locutus does the C&P just for shytes and giggles. When it comes to you, it is all about shytes and giggles. Nothing more. You are important in your own mind only.
coming from such an esteemed moderator as yourself, that really means a lot to me! Ya think? Clearly you're "MAD BRO" in continually having your bullshyte C&P denier crapola shown for what it is. You've clearly no game yourself... other than your "C&P Run & Gun" show, you've never, as I've read, actually argued anything in relation to your C&P posts... again, posts where you don't add word one of your commentary. You're a parrot; nothing more, nothing less. And you have the gall to presume to speak of owning someone - you're perpetually owned each and every time one of your C&P gems is punted... which happens repeatedly to you!
and yes, it is a swell day, any day, when you're shown for what you truly are here. Remember... don't BE MAD BRO! :mrgreen:
Yup, you just can't help proving over and over again how much of an idiot you truly are.
your butt hurtin' too? Again, the OP has an avenue for legitimate discussion... clearly, you've shown you haven't the intellect, or the wherewithal, to recognize that. As the loyal lapdog you are, you play up this "fishin' charade"! So, Locutus the Fisher, laid down a purposeful dedicated thread to "fish"! Is that what a board moderator would do to the membership at large? That OP link could provide the foundation for a most meaningful discussion... apparently, instead of taking it there, it's true intent was fishin'. As I said, I wasn't about to interpret the intent of the linked OP article for the thread originator... so I asked what was the intent, what was the point(s) the OP intended to make. "Locutus the Fisher" has a nice ring...
right back at you
Perhaps the loser is a school teacher. It uses bolded printing to assist teaching so called fine points (fine for idiots). It is obviously totally in love with the liberal lack of real knowledge.