Hey, Petros - you're losing your edge, that don't make sense. It's the law non abiding types they are trying to address. Actually just for sake of argument let's say I'm suspected of pedophilia/ porn distribution, if they take an hour of my time to rule me out GOOD. It just expedites the rest of their investigation and one less person is a consideration. Now having said that I don't want them breaking my door down at 3 A.M. :lol:
Wow....that's a spooky proposed law. Lets say you are suspected of pedophilia/porn
distribution? "
They" (being Law Enforcement) can take their evidence (
to justify their
suspicion) to a Judge, and if he/she feels the evidence
warrents it....a warrent can
be issued (removing the potential for unwarrented fishing expeditions into your, and
everyone else's, privacy), and then an hour of your time to rule you out as GOOD
can be taken. If it's just the
non abiding types "they" are trying to address, then
a warrent granted with evidence to a Judge wouldn't be out of sorts, would it?
Once the door to this sort'a thing is opened, without having to justify a "
suspicion" to
invade your (or anyone else's) privacy....where will it end? Right now it's proposed as
"
just" your name
& email
& ph#
& I.P.
& so on
and so forth...but can you not picture that
being expanded upon once the safeguards are removed and the taps are opened?