The Gun Registry Must be Deregistered!!
- Thread starter bluealberta
- Start date
Did he say Cosmo and Blue Bwhaaahahahahahahahahahah :lol: :lol: :lol: Now
I've seen everything :lol: :lol:
I've seen everything :lol: :lol:
Rev,
There is no reason why they should be registered.
And if you check the statistics, you'll find that the northern States that run along our southern border have roughly the same, or in some cases, even better gun crime statistics than we. Seems it's more of a cultural cause for the rampant gun crime in the rest of the states.
Nonsense. The registry will not tell the authorities that. It’s purpose was to win votes from urban people.
Yes there is. Registration serves no purpose.
There is no reason why they should be registered.
No I don’t.
That’s the guy who will have an arsenal of unregistered weapons, so that isn’t a reason for registration.
No doubt they would, but the registry will not tell them that.
No, more like safer cars with crumple zones and airbags, and seatbelt laws.
And if you check the statistics, you'll find that the northern States that run along our southern border have roughly the same, or in some cases, even better gun crime statistics than we. Seems it's more of a cultural cause for the rampant gun crime in the rest of the states.
Re: RE: The Gun Registry Must be Deregistered!!
Silly statements.
Registration always preceeds confiscation. In Britain, some weapons were required to be registered and the owners were assured they would never be confiscated. Then along came a horrific gun crime (massacre of 16 school kids in Scotland) and all the registered restricted weapons including handguns) were confiscated. Handgun crime then increased by something like 30%.
Here’s a simple concept; Guns used in the commission of a crime can be seized. Including those now registered. Saves the cost of the totally useless registry. And yes, registered guns can be seized. Officers responding to a domestic call, seeing guns, even legally owned, registered and stored, frequently seize them and it can take years to get them back.
TenPenny said:
Silly statements.
Registration always preceeds confiscation. In Britain, some weapons were required to be registered and the owners were assured they would never be confiscated. Then along came a horrific gun crime (massacre of 16 school kids in Scotland) and all the registered restricted weapons including handguns) were confiscated. Handgun crime then increased by something like 30%.
Here’s a simple concept; Guns used in the commission of a crime can be seized. Including those now registered. Saves the cost of the totally useless registry. And yes, registered guns can be seized. Officers responding to a domestic call, seeing guns, even legally owned, registered and stored, frequently seize them and it can take years to get them back.
Not exactly mom....it old quotes of cosmos and blue...buts I did hit the brakes sorta speaks whens I read the post...like I have told you many times on our trail rides momsy..its the odd things that catches me eye...Like...ehm......holy batdung on a rope...music man did lots of reading from his introduction post until his quote post up there...he must be taking one of those speed reading courses... :? :? :? :?
I think I might have left the last couple of words off of that sentence. :wink:
Oh well, his determination to remain open-minded and refusal to be rude is kind of...well...it's kind of hot, actually. I've always kind of like a man that can handle guns too. Don't tell Mrs. Rev, but I think the Music Man could be my magic man, if you know what I mean.
Reverend Blair said:
Wow Rev...you exemplify such tolerance, and set a shining example for us all... 8)
RE: The Gun Registry Must
I try Vanni. These guys that used to play in country bands are, you know....hot.
I try Vanni. These guys that used to play in country bands are, you know....hot.
Re: RE: The Gun Registry Must be Deregistered!!
You people persist in this insane delusion that "the government" wants to take your guns. You really really need some therapy. There's no point in debating this any more: there is a large group of people who suffer from some delusion about confiscation. If registration always preceeds confiscation, why aren't you worried about your cars? I use my car a lot more than I use my rifle, and I'm far more worried about "them" confiscating my car.
To use your logic, "they" are obviously planning to seize everyone's car, because, in your own words, registration always preceeds confiscation. And that reminds me, we had to "register" our children....are they going to be confiscated, too? I'd better run out and by an Uzi or an AK47 so that I can defend my family against the evil "they" who are going to take my car and my daughters.
Extrafire said:
You people persist in this insane delusion that "the government" wants to take your guns. You really really need some therapy. There's no point in debating this any more: there is a large group of people who suffer from some delusion about confiscation. If registration always preceeds confiscation, why aren't you worried about your cars? I use my car a lot more than I use my rifle, and I'm far more worried about "them" confiscating my car.
To use your logic, "they" are obviously planning to seize everyone's car, because, in your own words, registration always preceeds confiscation. And that reminds me, we had to "register" our children....are they going to be confiscated, too? I'd better run out and by an Uzi or an AK47 so that I can defend my family against the evil "they" who are going to take my car and my daughters.
Very logical of you :wink: I see only bureauocracy rearing it's ugly head in the Gun Registry,and not some conspiracy.
I'm convinced that the big overspending on the gun registry was due to the same thing as the sponsorship scandal. I expect that if anyone really investigated, they'd find most of the money went elsewhere.
Let's face it: every Province runs a system for registering cars and trucks, and drivers. How hard could it possibly be to implement a similar system to register firearms? There is no possible way that it could cost what has been spent.
Let's face it: every Province runs a system for registering cars and trucks, and drivers. How hard could it possibly be to implement a similar system to register firearms? There is no possible way that it could cost what has been spent.
Just a thought here: The govt. could have bought all of us a few guns and pre registered them for that price!
Here we are, two guys who are probably only10-15miles apart, discussing this over a server located 1000s of kms away......oh, the wonder of the net.
And it's so damn slow today that we could take a walk and meet in less time! 
But,I already did my walk today[and got some stuff at Olson's,too]
But,I already did my walk today[and got some stuff at Olson's,too]
It was so thick here that I couldn't see any signs of the breakins at the IT on lancaster &Dunn or at the Martello Tower office. Couldn't even see the Tower!
Vanni Fucci said:
Did I miss something? I read a lot of threads without signing on, and that one post caught my attention, so I signed on and posted it. No speed reading involved. And Reverend Blair, I don't hink I am your type. My wife likes me though! (Hey, I AM trying to lighten up a little!) But playing in a country band sure let me see a lot of stuff you don't see everyday.
RE: The Gun Registry Must
I'm heartbroken now, my Magic Music Man. I have hope though, I can leave my wife if you'll leave yours. We can get a cabin back in the woods someplace and shoot our guns off all day long.
I'm heartbroken now, my Magic Music Man. I have hope though, I can leave my wife if you'll leave yours. We can get a cabin back in the woods someplace and shoot our guns off all day long.