Okay, I'll clarify JLM... why expect CT to only sell goods (this thread is discussing child safety products, btw, just to clarify which goods we're talking about) that meet health canada standards (manuals, all parts included, within expiry dates, never been in a car accident), but not expect Jane from down the road to do the same when profiting off their sale?
Because it was new, in the box.
Used, sold as is, is a fair enough statement when selling a used car.
It should apply across the board.
The purchaser has to bear some responsibility.
Perhaps the thread IS right... it's the death of personal responsibility if you can't tell people "Hey, you know that product we made sure was safe when you bought it? We expect you to extend the same responsibility forward if you resell it."
Why should the same responsibility be passed forward?
Isn't that like saying you can't re/sell a 69 Pick up, because there's no seat belts?
The brakes don't work?
The tires are bald?
The purchaser bears all responsibility to ensure a vehicle is safe for the road, and meets present applicable standards.
If you buy a used car seat at a garage sale, it's used, and old. It's sold as is, it's use is the purchasers responsibility.