Correct, which is what a single world bank would be.
One socio economic world demographic pyramid, cannot, by it's very nature and shape, be unbalanced.
Show me such an impossible shape.
Regards
DL
The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it. You?
- Thread starter French Patriot
- Start date
One socio economic world demographic pyramid, cannot, by it's very nature and shape, be unbalanced.
Show me such an impossible shape.
Regards
DL
I've no idea what you mean by the impossibility of an unbalanced demographic pyramid in this context. More people in certain age cohorts than others, deviating from some supposed norm? So what's the norm then, and who defines it, and why would the world necessarily conform to it?
The norm would necessarily be whatever we begin with.
Governments decide those norms and issues today via their valuation of their wealth.
All the bank becomes is a tool for the whole worlds population.
It is the slave and not the master any more than your current bank.
Regards
DL
That's extremely variable around the world, rich areas and poor areas differ significantly in their demographic pyramids, with the former generally showing a bulge in the 20-60 age groups so the pyramid is actually more pear shaped, and the latter showing relatively very large numbers of the very young, so it appears as a sharply pointed pyramid with a broad base.
I begin to wonder if you actually know what a demographic pyramid is. Government policies can influence things like birth rates and fertility rates and family size, but they don't really get to decide what they're going to be, that's strongly influenced by social and cultural factors, notably the status of women. It can't have escaped your notice that in general birth rates and poverty levels are highest, as are a lot of negative indicators of socio-economic well-being, where the status of women is lowest.
We do not know what the initial shape of the pyramid will be.
What we have at present is somewhat as you describe but I see it more as the horrid hockey stick shape, like the one shown below.
9 out of 10 Americans are completely wrong about this mind-blowing fact. - Upworthy
Regards
DL
It has not.
Stats are showing gains for women, but I agree that they have a ways to go.
Men are slow to give women equality due to male insecurity.
Regards
DL
Yes we do, it looks like this: https://www.populationpyramid.net/world/2023/
That's about wealth distribution in the U.S., not a demographic pyramid. At that site linked to above you can also see that the difference between rich and poor areas is exactly, not somewhat, as I described, that's where I got it from. Western Europe looks like this, for instance: https://www.populationpyramid.net/western-europe/2023/ and western Africa looks like this: https://www.populationpyramid.net/western-africa/2023/
Last edited:
Not have kids? It's too bad so many kids were vacuumed out of the womb 20 years ago on the misbelief they had no financial or ecological future.
A 20 year old Canadian kid has better opportunities than a 20 year old did in the post war 1950s and the environment never healthier since the the post war era.
Population pyramids are not economic pyramids.
A bank does not care about your age so much as your worth.
Our socio economic pyramid is close to what I gave you.
Did you happen to notice how little wealth would need redistribution to end poverty on the graph?
Are we heartless and immoral to not do so?
Given the wealth of the world, yes we are.
Regards
DL
Trends are to hide behind such meaningless trendy words.
Woke is like God.
No one knows what it means.
Uninformed people love to use such garbage language.
Regards
DL
I know, but demographic pyramids are what you started out talking about, and that's what I was responding to, then you suddenly switched to talking about wealth distribution as if it was the same thing.
That may be a factor, certainly, but I don't see that it has to have a single root, that's an example of the maxim that any complex problem has a solution that's simple, compelling, and wrong. The major monotheisms have a significant role in it, with their devaluation of women and misinformation about their natures, but that's rooted in ignorance and mythology and the disturbed misogynistic personalities of a few people like St. Paul. Personally I think the notion that history can be understood as an oppressive struggle between men and women rooted in male insecurity is absurd, it's far more complex than that and there's really no good evidence that it's true anyway, it looks to me an invention from the lunatic fringe of post-modern feminism.
Without youth to produce, serve, build, maintain and consume money won't buy what doesn't exist.
If insecurity and our selfish genes are not the root of all human against human evil, what is?
Sure it is not simple, but where else could the root of all human against human evil come from, if not the result of our competing for women?
Complicate things all you want, but there is no other normal root cause for human against human evil.
Regards
DL
We are talking
Hmm.
True to a point. Timing is everything.
It all depends on the demographics on age, and it seems that the old are becoming the main source of purchasing need in the foreseeable future.
Regards
DL
This guy in the link thinks he's got the situation solved.
I think it's all bs, because even if everyone alive understood "the human condition" there would still be a shit-ton of conflict and adversity.
ain't no 'science' gonna solve it.
the only answer is love
https://www.humancondition.com/?fbclid=IwAR1cqh6AAY9c335uZ1ssynqIVYXcpvxmsD0um5C1N99_gUkZojF885fmVfg
irregards
:?P
