The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it. You?

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,795
2,751
113
What system? It has broken into several trade blocs. Globalism is dead. G7, BRICS, ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), CANZUK etc.
It may be dead, but There are still people pushing for a new world order. None of them have our best interests at heart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Not really dismal at predictions.

That's an unusually bright, perceptive, and articulate, character, I'd never heard of him before and I'm glad for your introduction of him, I'll be looking for more from him and thinking about what he says. He's not really making predictions as an economist though, he's going on about a much larger picture of geopolitics than economists usually grapple with. Maybe that's why they get it wrong so often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
I see a world version of what turdOWE has done to Canada. Deliberately causing mayhem in some areas to benefit other areas or as with turdOWE, punishing the areas that don't agree with his warped vision. Equalization payments going from producing nations to High population China and India.
We are indeed ahead of the curve.

We will profit sooner, perhaps.

We already have a great Canadian model to add to the initial world demographic pyramid shape.

Thanks for pointing it out.

Regards
DL
 

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
That seems highly doubtful to me, in fact I'd expect the opposite, I don't see any logic to the argument that melding a bunch of existing chaotic systems into a single system would produce stability or predictability. Doesn't work for weather prediction, the chaos at the heart of things remains no matter how wide the meteorologists cast their net, it's a feature of the system, we simply cannot get enough data or process it quickly enough to produce predictability. I see no reason to think it would work for economics. "Too big to fail" just seems to mean that taxpayers are on the hook to pay for keeping things going. I don't believe anything is too big to fail, that argument is really just that some things are so big and important we shouldn't let them fail, which means somebody has to pay to prevent it.
Not somebody my friend, ----- everybody, and everybody cannot fail.

That is why it profits all and cannot fail.

Regards
DL
 

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
Extremely doubtful. In theory maybe. But human nature is difficult to predict. And the system will be run by humans, probably way too many of them. Or a group of thugs like Russia and China will get together and take control of resources by force.
The theory is sound and has worked for companies on smaller scales.

A world bank can do nothing of the criminals you speak of, but it can make sure the bastards pay their fair share of taxes and stop picking your pocket.

The world and individual countries have only two collective choices to gain from the other side, as they compete against each other, for dominance. Force of arms or trade.

All banks hope that countries chose trade over physical war.

Regards
DL
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,150
3,913
113
Edmonton
What system? It has broken into several trade blocs. Globalism is dead. G7, BRICS, ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), CANZUK etc.
Tell that to the WEF - they want total control and it won't happen tomorrow or the next day. It will happen, over a period of time just like all this Trans B.S. has happened over time and WHAM!! there it is in it's full vile way - in our faces & god forbid if you don't agree.

Nothing is happening quickly; it's happening slowly and in an insidious way and it's being done on purpose. The elites don't want us paying attention so that they can "spring" it on us. Of course, it's all a "conspiracy" but is it? Really? I'm not so sure. Look what has happened in just the time that Biden & Trudeau have been in power. Look at the vile changes that have taken place. Hear the hatred spewed by people on the Left who refuse to debate issues and insist it's their way or the highway. There is no ability to discuss. We're in a horrible situation with no end in sight.

I consider myself fortunate in that when all this eventually comes into fruition, (2030 - 2050) I won't be here on planet earth to "reap the rewards of Marxism" but our kids will and that's what makes me crazy!! So, in the meantime, I'll bitch & complain at how horrible & vile this is for our kids as is my right. The poor souls will l have to pick up the pieces left by us because we were too "fearful" to fight for what is right & good and seem to accept things that have never been true or acceptable until now - i.e. biology no longer makes sense; medical personnel can't be trusted anymore; politicians are liars & don't care about who they represent; I can go on & on.

That's my rant for today! ;)
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,257
13,929
113
Low Earth Orbit
Tell that to the WEF - they want total control and it won't happen tomorrow or the next day. It will happen, over a period of time.
What do they want to control? Money? Energy? Society? All the rice? Or are they laying the groundwork for the movement of labour, technical and management to where its needed as the global population plummets over the next 30 years. Nothing will get built unless there is the free movement of workers as well as companies and nations to put it all together.

There is a huge labour shortage in Canada right now. Job creation pumped by gov't is bullshit. We need more people, we have the jobs.

Which nations are willing to sacrifice their youth and what does it cost us? A cheap post secondary education or trade they don't have to subsidize for their youth? Those nations also get an influx of cash from the students and workers who send money home.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Not somebody my friend, ----- everybody, and everybody cannot fail.

That is why it profits all and cannot fail.

Regards
DL
I'm still deeply skeptical. It's perfectly clear from history that whole societies, whole civilizations, can indeed fail, just look at a list of vanished empires. A single global civilization, which seems to be what you're promoting in some sense, as a human enterprise would have all the same weaknesses all human enterprises do--greed, ego, vested interests, ignorance, stupidity, thieves, liars, bullies, and so on--and seems no more likely to me to profit everybody and never fail than any other human enterprise. That's just not in the nature of things in my view. I'd immediately agree we could do much better than we have so far, but I have to agree with petros on most of this discussion. It's not happening, and most likely won't happen. I just cannot see most countries--especially powerful ones like the U.S., Russia, and China-- willingly surrendering any of their autonomy and independence to a world government. Some kind of global federalism might be achievable, and the EU might be a kind of model for that, but it's not in the best of shape right now either, Britain's exit has emboldened similar sentiments of independence in many of its members.

I don't mean to be cynical, but it's often hard not to be. As one of my favourite philosophers, George Carlin, once observed, never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. And if you've examined the matter at all, you'll know that a person of average intelligence isn't actually very bright, and by definition half of us aren't even that smart.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 55Mercury

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,710
9,241
113
Washington DC
So long as entire nations of people cannot even agree what form such a government should take, there cannot be a single world government other than an oligarchy enforced by a gigantic military. Probably the closest we ever came was the British Empire in its heyday, and by the time its heyday rolled around, it had already lost the United States.

The two powers with the best chance of imposing a world government if they could work together are the U.S. and China, and they can't work together.
 

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
Positions in what? A post globalism world?
A position in the various factions that will arise, be that right wing or left.

Nothing much will changer politically when we go to a world bank, --- that does not care about stupid politics.

Does you bank care today who rules you? No.

All they care about, and should care about, is maintaining a healthy too big to fail bank and economic system.

Regards
DL
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,710
9,241
113
Washington DC
But it cares who rules *it* in terms of statutes and regulations.
It also cares about the legitimacy of money. All money has been fiat money for quite some time now. Any country that suffers such problems as runaway inflation gets to the point where people lose faith in the money, and go to foreign currencies or barter. This is what banks dread most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 55Mercury

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,257
13,929
113
Low Earth Orbit
A position in the various factions that will arise, be that right wing or left.

Nothing much will changer politically when we go to a world bank, --- that does not care about stupid politics.

Does you bank care today who rules you? No.

All they care about, and should care about, is maintaining a healthy too big to fail bank and economic system.

Regards
DL
What about no wing? There can't be any wings for a single body to be leading the globe.
 

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,005
30
48
But it cares who rules *it* in terms of statutes and regulations.
All decided on by the world leaders and their banks.

The world gets to decide how big of a profit, off the top, that consolidation will gift us with.

We get to give to our children instead of taking their future and squandering it on our criminals.

Regards
DL