It's fun to watch crazy people fight.
It is merrier than watching the weather.
It's fun to watch crazy people fight.
It isn't intended to be a complete answer but it is subject oriented so it does have a place in a reply when the topic is the book and what is inside it. With 'the gap' we have it would be better if most of our time was spent in looking at the book itself rather than what is in it.by quoting what I post and posting scriptures after it, I am left to believe you are using bible passages to prove your point.
Miss the Courtroom that much do you?It's fun to watch crazy people fight.
Scholars, and all kinds of learned people have been trying for centuries to analyze and understand the Bible,It's fun to watch crazy people fight.
And we're supposed to take the Frenchpatriots, Cliffys, megahurts, Motars....etc. of internet forums seriously???
All gods and religions are myths created by people seeking power and believed by people that have no faith in their own self.
You really want to claim the experts' have been looking at the book as a mystery when they started off with a higher level of understanding than we have today.Scholars, and all kinds of learned people have been trying for centuries to analyze and understand the Bible,
And we're supposed to take the Frenchpatriots, Cliffys, megahurts, Motars....etc. of internet forums seriously???
The Western religions push obedience while the Eastern ones mostly push enlightenment.
Did your statement include the Eastern religions?
Regards
DL
Good way for the elite to not have to lower their standard of living so the lowest can be raised a tad. In Nepal the poorest people would fare better in an ongoing disaster just because they are used to using their own hands to get the tasks needed to survive another day.The Western religions push obedience while the Eastern ones mostly push enlightenment.
Did your statement include the Eastern religions?
Regards
DL
You pretty much got a lock on insanity in your family didn't you?I regard all religions much the same. SOme are relatively benign and some are downright dangerous.
You should give a bit of warning before you turn somebody to dust like that, next time, this one is perfect as it stands. lolOr you for that matter.
I regard all religions much the same. SOme are relatively benign and some are downright dangerous. Many religions or cultures if you prefer have multiple gods. SOme have only one. To date not one has proven that their god(s) exist yet the western ones particularly fight about who has the best god. Can't all be right. Can all be wrong though.
Show me where I have quoted the Bible, to prove anything, except as a joke for the Bible thumperOr you for that matter.
By eastern religions, which ones did you mean, Christianity wasn't started in the west.The Western religions push obedience while the Eastern ones mostly push enlightenment.
Did your statement include the Eastern religions?
Regards
DL
Good way for the elite to not have to lower their standard of living so the lowest can be raised a tad. In Nepal the poorest people would fare better in an ongoing disaster just because they are used to using their own hands to get the tasks needed to survive another day.
You pretty much got a lock on insanity in your family didn't you?
You should give a bit of warning before you turn somebody to dust like that, next time, this one is perfect as it stands. lol
Show me where I have quoted the Bible, to prove anything, except as a joke for the Bible thumper
I surely don't proselytize like those I named
By eastern religions, which ones did you mean, Christianity wasn't started in the west.
QUOTE]
True but it is the West's major religion.
The Eastern ones I had in mind were Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism. Generally speaking, those religions who recognize that their traditions are myth based. They seem to seek wisdom and do not fear their Gods.
Regards
DL
Show me where I have quoted the Bible, to prove anything, except as a joke for the Bible thumper
I surely don't proselytize like those I named
Then you are agreeing with my saying that I don't take those discussions seriously......It's just that you don't like my doing so!FFS, your in the spirituality & philosophy forum. You post zebra pic's. Those who you are attempting to belittle are on topic and are enjoying a back and forth discussion about a topic they enjoy. If you don't enjoy it, go find another area of forum.
FFS, your in the spirituality & philosophy forum. You post zebra pic's. Those who you are attempting to belittle are on topic and are enjoying a back and forth discussion about a topic they enjoy. If you don't enjoy it, go find another area of forum.
Well, ya gotta admit, titling the thread "The Bible. Myth or Reality?" is kinda trawling for trolls.FFS, your in the spirituality & philosophy forum. You post zebra pic's. Those who you are attempting to belittle are on topic and are enjoying a back and forth discussion about a topic they enjoy. If you don't enjoy it, go find another area of forum.
Lookee who's talking....you did bite a whole day before I did hey chummy?Well, ya gotta admit, titling the thread "The Bible. Myth or Reality?" is kinda trawling for trolls.
Well, ya gotta admit, titling the thread "The Bible. Myth or Reality?" is kinda trawling for trolls.
Now...who would be the idiot......The pompous armchair philosopher ? or the guy laughing at that pitiful excuse pretending to be an intellectual giant?You waste you good advice on an idiot.
Regards
DL
So what if it attracts trolls they would all be on the 'myth' side which would fit that the book is a spiritual guide rather than a book that is about literalism, such as would be suggested by this reference and many others. That 'many other' would allow me to post something new while the myth side is pretty much stuck with one line. Repeating it endlessly makes you stupid as well as ill informed if the verse below is new information.Well, ya gotta admit, titling the thread "The Bible. Myth or Reality?" is kinda trawling for trolls.
It was so wonderful to see you get dusted yesterday, literally. Perhaps the literal version freaks people out so much as they don't anything but wrath. Hebrews:12 is pretty clear that that is the first introduction to a literal version, what is ignored is that it last for a blink of an eye and it is replaced by peace of mind as is only possible with a literal God.Now...who would be the idiot......The pompous armchair philosopher ? or the guy laughing at that pitiful excuse pretending to be an intellectual giant?