The Atheist Holy War

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Oh, nuts. Almost everyone beat me to the punch with the Hitler thing. That'll teach me to read the posts before I post something redundant. But I did add the bit about animal experiments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
Oh, nuts. Almost everyone beat me to the punch with the Hitler thing. That'll teach me to read the posts before I post something redundant. But I did add the bit about animal experiments.
Doesn't that give you the urge to spank me ?;-)
 

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
Bart,

You are a little obsessive about the spanking thing, yes? I mean, the thought of a pretty lady laying her hands on my cheeks... Oh hell now you got me going!:lol:
Umm I was thinking the other way around.
And i am not obsessed :angry3:
Have you ever had that juice steak cooked just right?
So tender mmmmmmmmmm
The sound and giggle of when that hand smacks that soft yet firm backside.
That gasp of air as a reaction to the stroke?
That moan for more?
It's not because I'm obsessed its just that you never had a good steak !!!!8O


HAHHAHHAHHHAHHHAHHAHA
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Check out some of the pioneering work into Genetics (twins),
or Hypothermia as a start. If you're not already aware of the
history, it may be an eye opener. This scientific research
took place at Buchenwald and Auschwitz among other
places. That should be enough for a start to a search.

Ron, that has been the running argument in the scientific community. Should the world make use of the results obtained by Nazi research? The research was certainly done in the most non humane manner, no doubt there was torture, people died during the research.

However, it cannot be denied that it did uncover some useful information. So the big ethical question has been, should we make use of the research, or should we just ignore it?
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
WOW, you are particularly dense tonight, huh. I guess you've never heard of Hitler's buddies performing all manners of atrocious experiments. I guess you have never heard PETA squawking about the rights of animals that are tested just to make a lipstick or eyeliner.
BTW, "String Theory" isn't a theory, it's an hypothesis.

And just what does that have anything to do with the topic at discussion? Hitler didn’t kill anybody in the name of science; he didn’t kill people because they refused to believe in Big Bang Theory.

Nazis may have killed people while doing scientific research, but how is that the fault of science?

And just who has PETA killed because PETA didn’t agree with their science? You are talking nonsense. Show me an example where one man killed another man because he didn’t agree with is scientific theory. History is full of wars, battles where people killed other people by millions because they didn’t agree with their religion.

And I am dense tonight? Is that the best you can do? What a poor imagination, what a poor vocabulary. You are slipping, Anna, your insults are getting more and more inane. Try harder the next time.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Ron, that has been the running argument in the scientific community. Should the world make use of the results obtained by Nazi research? The research was certainly done in the most non humane manner, no doubt there was torture, people died during the research.

However, it cannot be denied that it did uncover some useful information. So the big ethical question has been, should we make use of the research, or should we just ignore it?

Same person from an earlier post:
Sorry Anna, I don’t think people have killed in the name of science.
Would you like to admit your error or does my observation stand that you haven't the manhood to admit it?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
And just what does that have anything to do with the topic at discussion? Hitler didn’t kill anybody in the name of science; he didn’t kill people because they refused to believe in Big Bang Theory.

Nazis may have killed people while doing scientific research, but how is that the fault of science?
Religious people may have killed while doing whatever they were doing, but how is that the fault of religion?

And just who has PETA killed because PETA didn’t agree with their science?
What the heck are you talking about? I didn't say PETA killed anyone. Idiot. I said the PETA makes a big stink about people killing animals in experiments just to make a better lipstick or eyeliner. Get a grip, child.
You are talking nonsense.
Not near as much as you.
Show me an example where one man killed another man because he didn’t agree with is scientific theory.
Sorry, no. Because you are trying to twist the point.
History is full of wars, battles where people killed other people by millions because they didn’t agree with their religion.
So?

And I am dense tonight? Is that the best you can do? What a poor imagination, what a poor vocabulary. You are slipping, Anna, your insults are getting more and more inane. Try harder the next time.
Nope. You are dense. Why should I make a flowery speech about how dense you are and repeat myself a couple or 3 times? I am not you. I think simple is best.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Pick a point when life begins.

When Life Begins
geneticists have it right. If those cells made by sperm and ovum weren't alive to start dividing, there would be no outcome. As they are alive, the cells divide until something hatches in a nest or pops out of a womb.
 
Last edited:

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
geneticists have it right. If those cells made by sperm and ovum weren't alive to start dividing, there would be no outcome. As they are alive, the cells divide until something hatches in a nest or pops out of a womb.


I like your answer just "pops out of a womb". :lol: