Terrorist Attack in Vegas :: BREAKING!!!

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,767
3,544
113
Parents of Las Vegas massacre victim sue gunmakers over bump-stock-ready weapons
Reuters
Published:
July 3, 2019
Updated:
July 3, 2019 1:46 PM EDT
A bump stock device (left) that fits on a semi-automatic rifle to increase the firing speed, making it similar to a fully automatic rifle, is installed on a AK-47 semi-automatic rifle, (right) at a gun store in Salt Lake City, Utah on Oct. 5, 2017.George Frey / Getty Images / Files
The parents of one of the 58 people slain in a 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting sued the makers and sellers of the assault-style rifles used in the attack, saying they knew the weapons could be jury-rigged to work similarly to illegal machine guns.
The wrongful death lawsuit placed blame for the high death toll in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history squarely on the manufacturers and dealers who allegedly knew the weapons could be converted into rapid-firing machines.
The lawsuit filed by James and Ann-Marie Parsons, whose daughter Carrie was struck by one of the 1,049 shots fired in the 10-minute Oct. 1, 2017, barrage on 20,000 unsuspecting concertgoers, seeks unspecified damages from 16 gunmakers and gun dealers.
“The events of Oct. 1 would not have occurred but for the defendants’ illegal and wrongful conduct,” said the complaint, which was filed in Nevada state court in Las Vegas.
The gunman, Steven Paddock, brought ammunition and an arsenal of 12 semi-automatic AR-15-style rifles that he converted with “bump stocks” to fire about as quickly as fully automatic weapons. He ended his attack by taking his own life.
Bump stocks use a gun’s recoil to bump its trigger, enabling a legal semi-automatic weapon to fire hundreds of rounds per minute as if it were a fully automatic machine gun. Machine guns are illegal in the United States.
The incident prompted the Trump administration to implement a ban on bump stocks on March 26, which the Supreme Court upheld in at least three challenges.
The lawsuit alleges that the defendants knew the ease with which AR-15s could be made to fire similarly to illegal machine guns, not only with bump stocks, but with household items such as shoe laces and rubber bands, and promoted them that way.
The lawsuit said “AR-15s were the weapon of choice for mass shooters looking to inflict maximum casualties,” at targets including Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater and an Orlando, Florida, nightclub.
“It was only a question of when – not if – a gunman would take advantage of the ease of modifying AR-15s to fire automatically in order to substantially increase the body count during a mass shooting,” the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit names as defendants Colt Defense LLC and its Colt Manufacturing Co LLC subsidiary; Daniel Defense Inc; Patriot Ordinance Factory; Herstal Group and its FN America and FN Herstal subsidiaries; Noveske Rifleworks LLC, Christensen Arms, Lewis Machine & Tool Co, LWRC International LLC, Discount Firearms and AMMO LLC, DF&A Holdings LLC, Maverick Investments LP, Sportsman’s Warehouse and Guns and Guitars Inc.
The companies could not be reached for immediate comment on Wednesday.
‘THEY WANT TO BE FAMOUS’: Should media stop naming gunmen in shootings?
Fire chief wants changes in wake of Las Vegas mass shooting
‘SOME FORM OF INFAMY’: FBI finds no specific motive in Las Vegas mass shooting
http://torontosun.com/news/world/pa...m-sue-gunmakers-over-bump-stock-ready-weapons
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
With the NRA in a mess its a good time to go after gun makers.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,183
14,241
113
Low Earth Orbit
Are you going after your parents for not splurging the extra $5 for seat belts?

How different would your life be had you been strapped in?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Married to a dominatrix? Imagine that.
;)
Just think of all the money you'd save.

But then, she would probably just tell you to give the cash to her, and you would. Then she would blow it all on her boy friend.

Like trudie does with Canada's tax dollars. He's obviously socking it away.
 
Last edited:

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Are you going after your parents for not splurging the extra $5 for seat belts?
How different would your life be had you been strapped in?
How different life would be if his mother had remembered to take her pill. He should sue the dr. for not making daily house calls to check on that.