Terrorist Attack in Vegas :: BREAKING!!!

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Yeah, buddy and I sat down for a burger at Jack-in-the-box next to The Wild West Truck stop.. if you could only get past his stuttering. ;)

F*ck off Blackie.. quit defending this loser.


I'm not defending him. I'm just saying there is no evidence he was a terrorist. Looks like the police agree with me, too.

Whinge all you like, but I'm right. There's no evidence the shooting was a terrorist attack.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
I'm not defending him. I'm just saying there is no evidence he was a terrorist. Looks like the police agree with me, too.

Whinge all you like, but I'm right. There's no evidence the shooting was a terrorist attack.

...are you sure..

Vegas killer Stephen Paddock went on a cruise to the MIDDLE EAST within the last year – as ISIS expert says a link to the terror group should not be ruled out

You see what happened when we banned SelfSame, he went on a shooting spree.

What's a 'lone wolf'? It's the special name we give white terrorists
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113

It doesn't take away from the fact that you're calling him a terrorist when you have ZERO evidence he was. Committing mass murder does not make you a terrorist - Columbine, for example, wasn't a terror attack. And just because you travelled to the Middle East and then came back and killed people still doesn't necessarily make you a terrorist.

The FBI's definition of terrorism specifies that the perpetrator must be pursuing a political objective. So the FBI would not be calling this a terror attack because they don't know the reasons behind the killing. Considering the killer's father was a schizophrenic it's entirely possible that the killer was also a schizophrenic and schizophrenia may have caused him to do it.

So all the loonies going round condemning Trump for rightly not calling this a terror attack just need to shut up.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
I'm not defending him. I'm just saying there is no evidence he was a terrorist. Looks like the police agree with me, too.

Whinge all you like, but I'm right. There's no evidence the shooting was a terrorist attack.

Why? What's your definition of "terrorist"? This was a highly planned attack, worked out over weeks, not some nutcase who snapped while delivering parcels.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Oh no, he called a mass murderer a terrorist without gathering all the evidence first.

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Why? What's your definition of "terrorist"? This was a highly planned attack, worked out over weeks, not some nutcase who snapped while delivering parcels.

Jack the Ripper probably meticulously planned his (or her) killing spree. Likewise, 100 years later, did the Yorkshire Ripper. Yet I've never heard anyone referring to their mass killings as terrorism.

I think it's quite cute that some people are trying to make this out to be a terrorist attack when they have no evidence that it has the requirements needed for it to be so. A mass killing does not always have to be terrorism, you numbskulls.

Columbine was never called a terror attack.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
BREAKING: Law enforcement says Las Vegas shooter “did not act alone” … new details

(Natural News) In a stunning statement that adds further weight to many of the questions raised by Natural News and other independent media leaders — the only remaining real journalists in America — Clark County Sheriff Joseph Lombardo publicly affirmed his belief that Stephen Paddock did not act alone.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10...as-shooter-did-not-act-alone-new-details.html

No, There Was Not More Than One Gunman in the Las Vegas Shooting
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/us/politics/fact-check-vegas-gunman.html
Oh look: the paper that we KNOW LIES for the LIE BARREL agenda!!!!

Yeah...
we know this is a cover up

Oh well, the dummies will go with the 'OS'
They always do.
While the dead go un answered and un avenged, which like dumping bin laden's body in the ocean so it couldn't be investigated,and blowing up the marines after, is the way things roll around here...there.
That is how a Sh!theel honors the innocent dead.


BTW: it becomes TERROR when the nazicommieglobalists who have always been allied with ISUS and the mid east Muslim terrorists use it to try to take the guns away in the US.

So really people like Ten Penny and Mental Floss and Boomer and the MSN are the "useless idiots" of the real terrorists.
 
Last edited:

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,549
113
Vegas shooter's note contained calculations for aim precision
Michael Balsamo and Amanda Lee Myers, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Saturday, October 07, 2017 09:54 PM EDT | Updated: Saturday, October 07, 2017 10:01 PM EDT
LAS VEGAS — Vice-President Mike Pence praised the heroic response by police and the resolve of the American people at a prayer service Saturday in Las Vegas before organizers released 58 white doves in memory of each victim killed in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.
At the same time, federal agents started hauling away piles of backpacks, baby strollers and lawn chairs left behind by fleeing concertgoers who scrambled to escape raining bullets from a gunman who was shooting from his high-rise hotel suite.
“It was a tragedy of unimaginable proportions,” Pence said as he addressed nearly 300 people at Las Vegas City Hall. “Those we lost were taken before their time, but their names and their stories will forever be etched into the hearts of the American people.”
Investigators have remained stumped about what drove gunman Stephen Paddock, a reclusive 64-year-old high-stakes video poker player, to begin shooting at the crowd at a country music festival from his 32nd-floor Mandalay Bay hotel suite last Sunday, killing 58 and wounding hundreds before taking his own life.
Investigators believe a note found on a nightstand in Paddock’s hotel room contained a series of numbers that helped him calculate a more precise aim, accounting for the trajectory of shots being fired from that height and the distance between his room and the concert, a law enforcement official said Saturday. The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the details of the ongoing investigation publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
The unity service Saturday afternoon came after dozens of people — many wearing shirts that said “Vegas Strong” — marched from Mandalay Bay to City Hall. After speeches from Pence and other politicians, doves were released into the air, flying in a wide arc and then disappearing into the distance as someone shouted, “God bless America!”
“On Sunday night, Las Vegas came face-to-face with pure evil, but no evil, no act of violence, will ever diminish the strength and goodness of the American people,” Pence said. “In the depths of horror, we will always find hope in the men and women who risk their lives for ours.”
Las Vegas Mayor Carolyn Goodman told the audience that the focus needs to remain on the victims, not “that horrific senseless animal.”
Lisa Rhoads-Shook, whose brother-in-law was inside the Mandalay Bay when the shooting broke out, said she wanted to attend the unity service to be part of the conversation about change.
“I’m so sad and it’s not fair, really, for us to experience another avoidable tragedy. We have to acknowledge that there is no better time to talk about gun control,” she said. “I don’t think the Founding Fathers wanted the right to bear arms to become the right to build an arsenal in your home.”
Investigators have chased 1,000 leads and examined Paddock’s politics, finances, any possible radicalization and his social behaviour — typical investigative avenues that have helped uncover the motive in past shootings. But Clark County Undersheriff Kevin McMahill said there’s still no clear motive.
What officers have found is that Paddock planned his attack meticulously.
He requested an upper-floor room overlooking the festival, stockpiled 23 guns, a dozen of them modified to fire continuously like an automatic weapon, and set up cameras inside and outside his room to watch for approaching officers.
Vegas shooter's note contained calculations for aim precision | VEGAS SHOOTING |
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Clearly, his motive was clearly to kill as many people as possible.

Is that a sufficient qualifier for a political motive?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113

How do you know he just didn't kill people for fun or because he was a schizophrenic like his father?

Terrorism is murdering for a cause, like the Paddies in the past and the Muzzies now. Going out and committing a huge killing spree because you think it's fun or because you are schizophrenic or because you are being bullied at high school isn't terrorism. It's just murder. There seems to be a strange tendency by some people nowadays to equate any mass murder to terrorism. I never remember Dunblane and Columbine being referred to as terrorist attacks.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Obviously, his cause is that he hates people.

I actually thought those were labelled terrorist attacks, but was never following them.

Clearly you can understand why there is some discrepancy here.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Obviously, his cause is that he hates people.

Maybe you should tell the police that, because it seems they don't know why he did it (although his father had schizophrenia, which can be inherited).

You seem to know a lot about this fellow and his motive. You seem rather suspicious.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,395
1,367
113
60
Alberta
Terrorists commit acts of terror. You don't think this was an act of terror? What would you call it?

How do you know he was a terrorist? You have no idea why he did it.

He murdered 58 innocent people.
What ****ing difference does arguing semantics of that bloodshed really accomplish?

Is he more of a killer because he was a terrorist?
Is he less of a killer because he's not a terrorist?

What a stupid ****ing argument.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Maybe you should tell the police that, because it seems they don't know why he did it (although his father had schizophrenia, which can be inherited).

You seem to know a lot about this fellow and his motive. You seem rather suspicious.

Free speech.

He murdered 58 innocent people.
What ****ing difference does arguing semantics of that bloodshed really accomplish?

Is he more of a killer because he was a terrorist?
Is he less of a killer because he's not a terrorist?

What a stupid ****ing argument.

He seems suspicious.

I wonder what his secret motive is.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
He murdered 58 innocent people.
What ****ing difference does arguing semantics of that bloodshed really accomplish?

Is he more of a killer because he was a terrorist?
Is he less of a killer because he's not a terrorist?

What a stupid ****ing argument.

A "stupid" argument which is even involving the US President, because there are numpties out there condemning him for not calling it a terror attack even though he can't do so because it's not definite that it as was.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,395
1,367
113
60
Alberta
A "stupid" argument which is even involving the US President, because there are numpties out there condemning him for not calling it a terror attack even though he can't do so because it's not definite that it as was.

Two out of three ain't bad.

ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
noun: terrorism
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.




But beyond the obvious, what does arguing such a point accomplish?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,187
14,245
113
Low Earth Orbit
He murdered 58 innocent people.
What ****ing difference does arguing semantics of that bloodshed really accomplish?

Is he more of a killer because he was a terrorist?
Is he less of a killer because he's not a terrorist?

What a stupid ****ing argument.

Maybe he thought guns laws were too weak so he tried making a point by wasting 58 lives and injuring 550 in the hope of gun laws being changed.

A useless martyr.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Two out of three ain't bad.

ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
noun: terrorism
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.




But beyond the obvious, what does arguing such a point accomplish?

I know what terrorism is.