Syrian rebel 'buried alive' at gunpoint
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
You ass is on the side that says arm the rebels to the nuts, just like in Libya but should any rebels show up in Bahrain then it is perfectly alright to gun them down where they stand.
Syria doesn't have to 'smuggle weapons in', they could have Russia air-lift the weapons in. That's why NATO is so chicken **** to fly over their land, the S-300 means they aren't defenseless, that is why there was a push to have Arab Nations do the grunt work. Once the rebels got pounded that pretty much evaporated. No use attacking when Russia is providing eyes in the sky, or is that through Iran, does it really matter
You can't even tell when 'your body' (ass) is being put in one camp as a vote as to who has the moral ground. The moral ground one that allows the rebels to use force against the Government as directed by outside nations. If you want to take it that you are an asshole, well that is between you and your shrink and if it was important to the conversation I would have already decided which is which and you wouldn't be left wondering what the decision was.
My comments are from the lack of posts by the usual war-hawks, as in the ones who supported the Libyan rebels even though they were not even from that country. I don't see you (or others in your group) having the same attitude if Bahrain got outside support that turned the protesters into gun-toting rebels even though they do hold the moral ground at the moment in that they are being killed rather than them being the killers.
All you care about is that Syria is friendly with Iran so they should be overthrown. There is a whole list of names that can be applied to that and ass isn't in the list. lol
Syria doesn't have to 'smuggle weapons in', they could have Russia air-lift the weapons in. That's why NATO is so chicken **** to fly over their land, the S-300 means they aren't defenseless, that is why there was a push to have Arab Nations do the grunt work. Once the rebels got pounded that pretty much evaporated. No use attacking when Russia is providing eyes in the sky, or is that through Iran, does it really matter
You can't even tell when 'your body' (ass) is being put in one camp as a vote as to who has the moral ground. The moral ground one that allows the rebels to use force against the Government as directed by outside nations. If you want to take it that you are an asshole, well that is between you and your shrink and if it was important to the conversation I would have already decided which is which and you wouldn't be left wondering what the decision was.
My comments are from the lack of posts by the usual war-hawks, as in the ones who supported the Libyan rebels even though they were not even from that country. I don't see you (or others in your group) having the same attitude if Bahrain got outside support that turned the protesters into gun-toting rebels even though they do hold the moral ground at the moment in that they are being killed rather than them being the killers.
All you care about is that Syria is friendly with Iran so they should be overthrown. There is a whole list of names that can be applied to that and ass isn't in the list. lol
We are even too cowardly to own up to our part in terrorizing Syrian civilians. My question isn't if we are losing our morality compared to if we ever even had any? Most likely not in that it was so easily given up to support acts such as the bombing below.
PressTV - ?'NATO-backed death squads basic cause of Syria unrest'?
PressTV - ?'NATO-backed death squads basic cause of Syria unrest'?
I thought Canada decided that this was a bad way to make changes in the ruling Government. The words 'Just watch.' were the next ones out of the PM's mouth and the citizens stood behind the imposed Martial Law when bodies showed up.
As part of NATO this is the kind of actions we are promoting as being acceptable but if arms were being given to protest groups here we would stop it quite quickly. (not that a large movement can be done without somebody in charge knowing about it)
Be nice to see how that crater compares to one that is at the heart of the STL investigation. Any bomb-blast experts out there? I think the barrier should have moved a little bit if the blast was lateral. I hope the UN was packing some cameras that actually worked or will they have been left behind just this one time. A UN disaster would bring Russian troops in rather than NATO who has ties to the 'enemy forces' Nato can monitor the election s when they happen, Egypt might be the model that sets the time-line for true change to take place.
Stability is the goal right, nothing like a few sets of S-400 systems to bring down the tension in the whole area. Wars are so much different when you have to walk there and pack your own bullets.
This bombing attack could be likened to the 9/11 hijackers finding out they were on remote control and they were just along for the ride, now the Syrian Rebels know who the boss is if this was a drone strike rather than road-side. They would not have sent out a parade route so no pre-planting.
NATO Summit and 17 Nation War Games on Syrian Border - Mr Syrian - YouTube
Even they are saying it was not a 'conventional' explosion.
Notice how this looks similar to the above post's photo as well as the similarities below.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/10/syria-violence_n_1505488.html#s=960496
Even they are saying it was not a 'conventional' explosion.
Notice how this looks similar to the above post's photo as well as the similarities below.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/10/syria-violence_n_1505488.html#s=960496
There is no hope for the middle east, and if there is a Word War 3 it will start there for sure.
You two are aware that this was a NATO operation right, the same weapon in both instances and I doubt you are going to say Assad or the NATO backed Rebels have drones that can cause this kind of destruction. One of you should be able to know the difference, that both of you can't see the similarities speaks volumes. However if you would ;llike to change mu mind show me the pics that the French did in trying to recreate the same damage in investigation in the assassination. Israel followed that hit with a drone that Hezbullah had hacked the video to, no doubt Israel or the US has footage of how this explosion happened, don't expect any releases. Want proof, find out if the route was published, in tha assassignation it wasn't and there was all sorts of jamming equipment in the escort cars. Perhaps you two are just too trusting, to put it as nicely as I can (or care to)
Last edited:
Seems that the instigators for an uprising is coming from outside of the countries and those are the ones that is giving support to the rebels.
Those countries will eventually see a uprising within their borders.
Internal Domestic Issues, what part do the outside countries not understand.
World propaganda machines are pushing us towards another world war.
.
.
Those countries will eventually see a uprising within their borders.
Internal Domestic Issues, what part do the outside countries not understand.
World propaganda machines are pushing us towards another world war.
.
.
It gets better, rather than a real investigation that looked for the true culprits there was a set up that implicated some Syrian Generals which was not exposed as a hoax for about 55 years. In that time the Syrian/Lebanon relationship soured some, just like intended. Now is there any possibility that this would be a repeated use of a thermite weapon (white smoke in the photo)? Want to see the same smoke on 9/11 look at the corner of the tower that was pouring white smoke while rivers of molten metal poured out just around the corner. Just sayin .......
Going down in moral values if this is what it takes to bring democracy. Being so close to Israel that is where the drone would normally come from, mind you Turkey is right there as is any number of bases that are NATO controlled. Same technique twice and think it wouldn't get noticed is asking for a Pearl Harbor on 9/11? So that would have been a NATO operation also then, America taking a punch for the team. Sick pack of puppies, that's for sure.
NATO and CIA Covertly Arming Syrian Rebels in Order to Weaken Iran
Syrian Rebels wouldn't have wiped out civilians and only wounded Syrian troops, they would have gone after UN bodies as that is what would have brought troops in. NATO either though the backlash would be too great if Pearl Harbor III went sour, which it has cause they couldn't resist showing off of time is so short desperation is setting in. I hope they don't name that weapon a 'fire from the sky' that would just be so dorky.
Is that the NATO you mean???
NATO and CIA Covertly Arming Syrian Rebels in Order to Weaken Iran
Syrian Rebels wouldn't have wiped out civilians and only wounded Syrian troops, they would have gone after UN bodies as that is what would have brought troops in. NATO either though the backlash would be too great if Pearl Harbor III went sour, which it has cause they couldn't resist showing off of time is so short desperation is setting in. I hope they don't name that weapon a 'fire from the sky' that would just be so dorky.
Is that the NATO you mean???
I would think the ones letting off both explosions would be the cuckoo ones, but then that is an small insight into your world rather than mine. I'm sure you would agree Syrian Rebels do not have the capability of precision bombing with the nex-gen bombs, then again there is that filter you apply to most real things so you can fit in into your world.
You may doubt me but Russia is saying the Gov of Syria did not do this deed, that leaves you know who, the destroyer of towers, ... wait, that was the bas side of that group and Syria only has the good side of that group, free now their task in Libya has been paid for in gold. Real shock to the Lybians who did the same get nada, welcome to freedom, get it while you can. Damn, gone already.
Al-Qaida and its associates are behind the recent bomb attacks in Syria, the Russian foreign ministry said Monday.
"For us it is absolutely clear that terrorist groups are behind this -- al-Qaida and those groups that work with al-Qaida," Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told reporters.
Twin suicide bombings in Damascus last week killed 55 people and wounded 372, raising fears that extremist elements were taking advantage of the deadlock in Syria to stoke the unrest.
Russia Says Qaida behind Syria Attacks
Lets do a theory that the 'all knowing A-Q gang' have access to secret stuff because they are just that good. The UN sends in a forensic team to do a fine clean-up of the area so a realistic model can be built, Realistic down to a car with it's hood blown upwards and the engine gone and the rest of the vehicle is intact still. That car was not the one holding any bomb, Not so odd that some 9/11 cars showed similar damage if heat rather than a concussion wave was the means of the destruction (given that creating that heat will create an explosion that is not weak either)
It should be possible to do a software analysis of both craters to determine what forces could leave such damage. Visually they look quite similar, more power used in one is the only difference.
You may doubt me but Russia is saying the Gov of Syria did not do this deed, that leaves you know who, the destroyer of towers, ... wait, that was the bas side of that group and Syria only has the good side of that group, free now their task in Libya has been paid for in gold. Real shock to the Lybians who did the same get nada, welcome to freedom, get it while you can. Damn, gone already.
Al-Qaida and its associates are behind the recent bomb attacks in Syria, the Russian foreign ministry said Monday.
"For us it is absolutely clear that terrorist groups are behind this -- al-Qaida and those groups that work with al-Qaida," Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told reporters.
Twin suicide bombings in Damascus last week killed 55 people and wounded 372, raising fears that extremist elements were taking advantage of the deadlock in Syria to stoke the unrest.
Russia Says Qaida behind Syria Attacks
Lets do a theory that the 'all knowing A-Q gang' have access to secret stuff because they are just that good. The UN sends in a forensic team to do a fine clean-up of the area so a realistic model can be built, Realistic down to a car with it's hood blown upwards and the engine gone and the rest of the vehicle is intact still. That car was not the one holding any bomb, Not so odd that some 9/11 cars showed similar damage if heat rather than a concussion wave was the means of the destruction (given that creating that heat will create an explosion that is not weak either)
It should be possible to do a software analysis of both craters to determine what forces could leave such damage. Visually they look quite similar, more power used in one is the only difference.
The media is now openly reporting Al-Qaeda terrorists are working alongside UN Observers in Syria as videos show the terrorists gathering intel for future strikes.
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/20...-alqaeda-cover-syria-identify-targets-133011/
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/20...-alqaeda-cover-syria-identify-targets-133011/
Perhaps the UN should stop giving out it travel routes.
UN Openly Giving Al-Qaeda Cover In Syria To Identify Targets
Bomb Hits U.N. Convoy as NGO Accuses Syrian Regime of 'Massacre during Monitors Visit'
A convoy of U.N. truce observers came under bomb attack in a Syrian town on Tuesday during a funeral procession in which a monitoring group said regime forces "massacred" 20 people.
The incidents took place as Syria's anti-regime revolt entered a 15th month of relentless violence that has killed more than 12,000 people and amid growing fears that a U.N.-backed peace plan will fail.
The blast occurred as the convoy made its way along a narrow street in Khan Sheikhoun, a town in Idlib province, said activists, rebels and a watchdog.
U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said the bomb exploded in front of the convoy and that three vehicles were damaged but no casualties were reported.
UN Openly Giving Al-Qaeda Cover In Syria To Identify Targets
Bomb Hits U.N. Convoy as NGO Accuses Syrian Regime of 'Massacre during Monitors Visit'
A convoy of U.N. truce observers came under bomb attack in a Syrian town on Tuesday during a funeral procession in which a monitoring group said regime forces "massacred" 20 people.
The incidents took place as Syria's anti-regime revolt entered a 15th month of relentless violence that has killed more than 12,000 people and amid growing fears that a U.N.-backed peace plan will fail.
The blast occurred as the convoy made its way along a narrow street in Khan Sheikhoun, a town in Idlib province, said activists, rebels and a watchdog.
U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said the bomb exploded in front of the convoy and that three vehicles were damaged but no casualties were reported.
Can you guys even see the word 'Syria'? lol
So actually the regime change has been going on since 2007, about the same time the false claims about Syria being involved in the assassination that is at the heart of the STL. It certainly shows Canada is a deaf,dumb, blinf bitch of NATO or we are (and most likely true looking back on how long the Indian Torture Schools ran) as morally bankrupt as ever.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2012/05/us-officially-arming-extremists-in.html
Really we should have seen it (moral bankruptcy) coming, perhaps 'we' did and 'we' just don't give a **** because 'we' were doing the killing.
http://uruknet.com/?p=m88073&hd=&size=1&l=e
[FONT=Verdana,Arial][FONT=Verdana,Arial]Liberia's Charles Taylor has been convicted of war crimes, so why not the western leaders who escalated Libya's killing?
May 15, 2012
Libya was supposed to be different. The lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan had been learned, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy insisted last year. This would be a real humanitarian intervention. Unlike Iraq, there would be no boots on the ground. Unlike in Afghanistan, Nato air power would be used to support a fight for freedom and prevent a massacre. Unlike the Kosovo campaign, there would be no indiscriminate cluster bombs: only precision weapons would be used. This would be a war to save civilian lives.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial]Seven months on from Muammar Gaddafi's butchering in the ruins of Sirte, the fruits of liberal intervention in Libya are now cruelly clear, and documented by the UN and human rights groups: 8,000 prisoners held without trial, rampant torture and routine deaths in detention, the ethnic cleansing of Tawerga, a town of 30,000 mainly black Libyans (already in the frame as a crime against humanity) and continuing violent persecution of sub-Saharan Africans across the country.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial]A year after the western powers tried to make up for lost ground in the Arab uprisings by tipping the balance of the Benghazi-led revolt, Libya is in the lawless grip of rival warlords and armed conflict between militias, as the western-installed National Transitional Council (NTC) passes Gaddafi-style laws clamping down on freedom of speech, gives legal immunity to former rebels and disqualifies election candidates critical of the new order. These are the political forces Nato played the decisive role in bringing to power.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial]Now the evidence is starting to build up of what Nato's laser-guided bombing campaign actually meant on the ground. The New York-based Human Rights Watch this week released a report into the deaths of at least 72 Libyan civilians, a third of them children, killed in eight separate bombing raids (seven on non-military targets) – and denounced Nato for still refusing to investigate or even acknowledge civilian deaths that were always denied at the time.[/FONT]
[/FONT]
So actually the regime change has been going on since 2007, about the same time the false claims about Syria being involved in the assassination that is at the heart of the STL. It certainly shows Canada is a deaf,dumb, blinf bitch of NATO or we are (and most likely true looking back on how long the Indian Torture Schools ran) as morally bankrupt as ever.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2012/05/us-officially-arming-extremists-in.html
Really we should have seen it (moral bankruptcy) coming, perhaps 'we' did and 'we' just don't give a **** because 'we' were doing the killing.
http://uruknet.com/?p=m88073&hd=&size=1&l=e
[FONT=Verdana,Arial][FONT=Verdana,Arial]Liberia's Charles Taylor has been convicted of war crimes, so why not the western leaders who escalated Libya's killing?
May 15, 2012
Libya was supposed to be different. The lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan had been learned, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy insisted last year. This would be a real humanitarian intervention. Unlike Iraq, there would be no boots on the ground. Unlike in Afghanistan, Nato air power would be used to support a fight for freedom and prevent a massacre. Unlike the Kosovo campaign, there would be no indiscriminate cluster bombs: only precision weapons would be used. This would be a war to save civilian lives.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial]Seven months on from Muammar Gaddafi's butchering in the ruins of Sirte, the fruits of liberal intervention in Libya are now cruelly clear, and documented by the UN and human rights groups: 8,000 prisoners held without trial, rampant torture and routine deaths in detention, the ethnic cleansing of Tawerga, a town of 30,000 mainly black Libyans (already in the frame as a crime against humanity) and continuing violent persecution of sub-Saharan Africans across the country.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial]A year after the western powers tried to make up for lost ground in the Arab uprisings by tipping the balance of the Benghazi-led revolt, Libya is in the lawless grip of rival warlords and armed conflict between militias, as the western-installed National Transitional Council (NTC) passes Gaddafi-style laws clamping down on freedom of speech, gives legal immunity to former rebels and disqualifies election candidates critical of the new order. These are the political forces Nato played the decisive role in bringing to power.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial]Now the evidence is starting to build up of what Nato's laser-guided bombing campaign actually meant on the ground. The New York-based Human Rights Watch this week released a report into the deaths of at least 72 Libyan civilians, a third of them children, killed in eight separate bombing raids (seven on non-military targets) – and denounced Nato for still refusing to investigate or even acknowledge civilian deaths that were always denied at the time.[/FONT]
[/FONT]
Last edited: