Read it.
That didn't disqualify that the carbon tax reduced emissions and is revenue neutral.
the oil companies want a carbon tax that will reduce the oil companies own profits eh?
lol
now if anyone was wondering if the whole mmgw debate was BS, there's your sign
(though, I am not certain its a good sign if it takes a person this long to see something that plain)
They sent their best that is for sure. So much for that 'recovery' you always imagine happens.I was only operating at yours and Fluffers level.
Is this one of those messages or is this you being an idiot? It might matter to somebody somewhere.Since any attempt to communication above that, would be lost on either of you.
Because it is grade 'c' rather than grade 'a'. Fermenting fruit is better for you anyways if you are in SK.Let's add in the inflated neutral cost of living. Why else would BC fruit and veg be 20¢ an lb cheaper in SK?
Trust me when I say chatting with you doesn't elevate me or anybody else that does it. More like that lone mosquito in the room after you turn out the light for a nap. You might as well get up and hunt it down as soon as it makes it's appearance known to you. You should be able to relate to that.You're not elevating yourself or disproving my well established claim.
'oft repeated' claimYou're not elevating yourself or disproving my well established claim.
Neutral? Impoverished lending the province cash money and waiting a year to get it back with zero interest is not f-cking neutral. It is stealing from the poor.
There's no such thing.It's revenue neutral.
There's no such thing.
But lets say for one second, there is. Why place a carbon tax on anything? If it's neutral, just shuffle the funds without filtering it through the taxpayer.
There's no such thing.
But lets say for one second, there is. Why place a carbon tax on anything? If it's neutral, just shuffle the funds without filtering it through the taxpayer.
I'm glad you agree that the term is fraudulent.The revenue to the government lost from carbon reduction is made up somewhere else.
That is all that revenue neutral means.
According to Fluffer here, that never happened.I'll take the revenue positive route and head to Washington state for gasoline with everyone else.
I'm glad you agree that the term is fraudulent.