Suncor CEO says every province/country should have a.. CARBON TAX
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
I already accepted that you agree there's no such thing as 'revenue neutral'.
I'm glad you're at least honest enough to admit that.
That is your game. What was your excuse? Something about small businesses are allowed to scam?
B.C.'s tax, implemented in 2008, covers most types of fuel use and carbon emissions. It started out low ($10 per tonne of carbon dioxide), then rose gradually to the current $30 per tonne, which works out to about 7 cents per litre of gas. “Revenue-neutral” by law, the policy requires equivalent cuts to other taxes.Jul 9, 2014
Google - bc carbon tax revenue neutral
Google - bc carbon tax revenue neutral
Liar, you did no such thing. You simply ignored it.
I'm not surprised to see you resort to dishonesty though, it's the hallmark of your ilk.
Oh, the Asian trophy wife. I wonder if she enjoys the mysogyny or is that a white privilege?
I read the whole thing.
The carbon tax reduced emissions and is revenue neutral.
No legally binding required.
The carbon tax reduced emissions and is revenue neutral.
No legally binding required.
All of these pitchforks and not even a grazing.
It's revenue neutral and it reduced carbon emissions.
It's revenue neutral and it reduced carbon emissions.
I was referring to him bringing up your wife in another thread.
Liar.
There's the proof.
When the Gov't. returns a tax why bitch about it? (I know they are ripping off a couple of cents on the dollar)
No and no. Burning gasoline from Washington state doesn't lower BC emissions.
Is it the fact that you've got your eyes closed, and your pingers in your ears, or is it that you're too hopped up on molly to feel it?
It does if you're strung out on molly.