Let's hear from your perspective on definition of JusticeIf you think "justice" has a working definition, do tell us what it is.
I know most about administrative design
Not like people or lack of workings of people
Nothing really generic
Let's hear from your perspective on definition of JusticeIf you think "justice" has a working definition, do tell us what it is.
Precisely. "Justice" turns out to be "my opinion of what's right and wrong."What version would you like in how I perceive Justice to serve Canadians?
There are multiple choice versions,of my definition of Justice
,would you like my romantic Liberal version of working Justice?
How about sleep on it version?,hoping to articulate my experiences within information auditing,which left me with poor conclusions about the administration of Justice,tell it like it is and hoping to offend no one?
Maybe the conspiracy theory version,are u a conspirator lover?I could give you this version if needed,big business conspiracy theories is.
I have never thought about how I perceive working Justice,this question has me thinking,
How about the hot pen version,as I am demonstrating right now,
I guess I know more what Justice should not look like rather what it should look like in a positive manner,right from the bottom to the top
Individuals in a position to make a difference within the administration of Justice was a big disappointment,therefore I guess there is aflip side of positive thinking
Sleezy people are not allowed to operate with the administration of Justice,this is the flip side
Only nice,focussed,public serving,constitutional loving,none partisan,correct people need to serve Canadians
Geographically where one lives effects the administration of Justice
No more cartoon Justices under this positive thought program
I'm onto something
What version do you prefer?
As creation has it,there will be more versions
Shift change or mom calling you for supper?
You keep right on believing your opinions of right and wrong are somehow objective.Thank you
Right or Wrong?
When Justice purposefully engages in wrong,and when this wrong becomes a repetitive intention,or common practice,extra assurance,and all the other rotten means and methods,
Is it still wrong?
Oh believe me when I was in spin,and otherwiseYou keep right on believing your opinions of right and wrong are somehow objective.
I hope your formula is better than Angst's.There is an established formula to information laundering within Justice,a formula which serves few
This is not subjective speak
I found where one sits st the table impacts their views on JusticeI hope your formula is better than Angst's.
My formula is pretty dam goodI found where one sits st the table impacts their views on Justice
If you are not at the table,like myself,there are no reciprocal opportunities
I have lots to share in the formula department
I will keep some secrets
F off GerryH
GerryH I need you on my team
You can be a paid creeper,ease drop while you lurk about
I need good ears
And please don't post GerryH stupid comments
Thank you
I can't give away some of the technical knowledge of information auditing,what if you are my competition?I know. . . . secrets! Big, important secrets!
I am not sure what you mean,debate?Shows Pudney's intelligence debating that person.