It's cuz they close their eyes and make that scrunchy face as they pull the trigger.That was the silver lining ... liberals cannot shoot.
It's cuz they close their eyes and make that scrunchy face as they pull the trigger.That was the silver lining ... liberals cannot shoot.
Doing exactly what you support: using guns to fight a tyrannical government.
Too bad it's not the 1700s.
I see the liberals are really having a tough time accepting that their hate speech caused this.
They voted out their tyrannical government in November. Remember all the snowflakes crying because they lost the election they were positive they had rigged?
Could you support that statement? I do not support what he did at all, nor is this a tyrannical government.
So please... support your statement.
He found the government tyrannical. Just like Sam Adams and Patrick Henry did. And John Brown.Could you support that statement? I do not support what he did at all, nor is this a tyrannical government.
So please... support your statement.
You don't believe in the Second Amendment? Or do you believe that guns are for decoration, never to be used?
A lunatic like Patrick Henry. A lunatic like Nathan Hale. A lunatic like Ethan Allen.Yep... More twisted justification for the actions of a lunatic
As I also said (not "like," you illiterate peasant!), the history isn't written yet.Like you said, it's the victors that write history.
In this case, buddy was not victorious
As I also said (not "like," you illiterate peasant!),
the history isn't written yet.
Too bad Congressman Greg Gianforte wasn't there. He woulda just body-slammed Nutbar McGee, and that woulda been the end of it!
'Course, then the righty snowflakes'd have to find something else to whimper about.
You have some kind of filter that blocks Old Stock Canadian and Real American whimpering about how lefties are all violent Nazi Klansmen? Where can I get me one of those?My bad: My interpretation of your contribution (I'll be generous on that) is that there was the implication to which I referred
Oh, but it has... The moment that the issue was reported on wrote the event into a form of history.
That said, the interpretation of said event will evolve over time subject to the influences du jour
.... Or, Bill Clinton might have taken steps to solicit buddy into wearing a blue dress and play a round of Eager Intern.... Buddy may have been star-struck enough to pass on the shooting altogether
It's the leftard snowflakes that are doing all the whining, back peddling and whimpering at this point
Yep... More twisted justification for the actions of a lunatic
A lunatic like Patrick Henry. A lunatic like Nathan Hale. A lunatic like Ethan Allen.
You don't believe in the Second Amendment? Or do you believe that guns are for decoration, never to be used?
Doing exactly what you support: using guns to fight a tyrannical government.
Patrick Henry and Nathan Hale weren't like Patrick Henry and Nathan Hale. Who knows what history will make of Hodgkinson (probably nothing at all, but you never know). Remember that the fuse for the Boston Massacre was lit by a colonial who falsely accused a British Officer of not paying his bill.Hodgkinson was like Patrick Henry and Nathan Hale... come on now.
Patrick Henry and Nathan Hale weren't like Patrick Henry and Nathan Hale. Who knows what history will make of Hodgkinson (probably nothing at all, but you never know). Remember that the fuse for the Boston Massacre was lit by a colonial who falsely accused a British Officer of not paying his bill.
Who remembers now that a slanderer started the American Revolution?
It was the trigger for the Boston Massacre, which was one of the triggers for the Revolution. Because it happened first in time (March 5, 1770) many call it the source of the Revolution.Whoa! There were MANY reasons for the Boston Massacre and the Revolution. A false accusation of such insignificance was not the trigger for the Revolution.
I KNOW you don't believe that.
It was the trigger for the Boston Massacre, which was one of the triggers for the Revolution. Because it happened first in time (March 5, 1770) many call it the source of the Revolution.
I beg your pardon, sir! Do you, perhaps, refer to Dorchester Heights?right there in Southie!
Yes, Illinois will be on Sarah Palin's target map no doubt.
I beg your pardon, sir! Do you, perhaps, refer to Dorchester Heights?
Funniest part is all the colonials (most of 'em anyhow) really wanted was representation in Parliament. The legendary stiff necks of the Brits cost them an empire.