What was found was negligible. Does not substantiate the Bush argument of WMD.
Kerist, who would buy into this as proof?
I think it's what wasn't found that might be dangerous!
What was found was negligible. Does not substantiate the Bush argument of WMD.
Kerist, who would buy into this as proof?
As the NY Times concludes, “The discoveries of these chemical weapons did NOT support the government’s invasion rationale.”
George W. Bush was still completely wrong about Iraq’s WMDs | Rare
Posted in the conservative antiwar.com.
Wait... what?
lmao... Owned by yourself.
WMD were in Iraq before, during and after the war.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/....html?emc=edit_na_20141014&nlid=58569598&_r=1
Rove blamed for not letting info go public in '06.
Insiders Blame Rove for Covering Up Iraq’s Real WMD - The Daily Beast