Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crimes?

[zoofer]

Too bad the Constitution forbids a 3rd term. The world needs GW more now than ever before. Electing a pinko appeaser will be disasterous for Western civilization. It would be poetic justice for the present wretched Saddamites among us. Their grand children will curse them for their abject surrender.

 

[FiveParadox]

Exactly that is why george w bush should be impreached.

Sorry, but on a point of procedure: impeachment, if I am not mistaken, is the act of the House of Representatives passing a motion in their House that would charge the President with some act or another, correct? Only after a President has been "impeached" are the charges heard in the Senate? Sorry, I am unfamiliar with how the republican impeachment process functions.

 

[I think not]

Well, it's a good thing the fringe left never gets its way. All they can do is come up with alternative realities to keep them going.

 

[pastafarian]

The world needs GW more now than ever before.

:laughing3: :laughing3: :laughing3: :laughing3: :laughing3:

No, no seriously, it's true...the planet has never needed an incompetent, inarticulate illiterate, lying, cowardly, spoiled rich boy more than now!

:laughing5:

 

[Johnny Utah]

Exactly that is why george w bush should be impreached.

Sorry, but on a point of procedure: impeachment, if I am not mistaken, is the act of the House of Representatives passing a motion in their House that would charge the President with some act or another, correct? Only after a President has been "impeached" are the charges heard in the Senate? Sorry, I am unfamiliar with how the republican impeachment process functions.

I think you have it right, when Clinton was charged with Impeachment he then faced trial in the Senate, which of course he was't found guilty of the charges. It's not a republican process of Impeachment persay, it was only a Republican lead Impeachement against Clinton.

The only chance Bush has to be Impeached is if the Democrats control both the House and the Senate, which is unlikely because the Democrats have a way of sticking their foots in their mouths which they will no doubt be doing before the 2006 elections.

Anyone who wants the President of The United States Impeached in a time of War isn't thinking straight because an Impeachment of any President while The United States is at War would greatly embolden America's Enemies World Wide including Bin Laden and Al Qaeda.

 

[Jay]

Well they sure as hell don't need some traitor Democrat who thinks America deserved 911, that's for sure.

 

[pastafarian]

Well they sure as hell don't need some traitor Democrat who thinks America deserved 911, that's for sure.

Problem is, Jay no Democrat thinks that, it's a hallucination from the Kool-Aid you're drinking. :wink:

In any case, the traitorous Democrats are all in favour of sending other people's children to die for Halliburton and to help create more America-hating terrorists.

 

[Jay]

Glad to see you back around Pasta...I missed you, you know.

 

[Johnny Utah]

Well they sure as hell don't need some traitor Democrat who thinks America deserved 911, that's for sure.

Problem is, Jay no Democrat thinks that, it's a hallucination from the Kool-Aid you're drinking. :wink:

In any case, the traitorous Democrats are all in favour of sending other people's children to die for Halliburton and to help create more America-hating terrorists.

The War in Iraq is for the evil Halliburton! That is such an Old Moonbat Talking point. :lol:

If you are saying the Iraq War under President Bush is creating more America hating Terrorists (which by the way is total BS), then the 8 years of President of President Clinton created America hating Terrorists who committed 9/11, or will you try to somehow blame that on President Bush to? :roll:

 

[zoofer]

Not wise to keep feeding the trolls.

 

[darkbeaver]

Well, it's a good thing the fringe left never gets its way. All they can do is come up with alternative realities to keep them going.

In case you don't keep up with the news ITN the left socialist global movement is taken over the world and the main stream media is to rotten to tell the masses, they keep using the term populist because they don't want to inform the people that lefties are back and the long war to exterminate us has failed.
If you're still arround after the revolution that vegetable picking job is still on the table but I see you're going to need more reeducation than I originally thought. :lol:

 

[pastafarian]

:laughing8: :laughing8: :laughing8:

If you are saying the Iraq War under President Bush is creating more America hating Terrorists (which by the way is total BS), then the 8 years of President of President Clinton created America hating Terrorists who committed 9/11, or will you try to somehow blame that on President Bush to?

:laughing8: :laughing8: :laughing8::laughing8: :laughing8: :laughing8:

 

[darkbeaver]

JonB2004

Your argument that 2300 American soldiers died and 250,000 Iraqi's died (where the hell did you ever get that number by the way) is not a premise for a war crime. War crimes are defined as breaking rules of engagement, intentionally killing civilian populations and so forth.

And people like JonB2004 wonder why their never taken serious. :roll:

Hey TV boy you're scared shitless of the left and you take us very seriously or you wouldn't be here mouthing off like a parrot <snip> Play nice or get out of the sandbox, thank you

 

[Jay]

Why is Dark Beaver given freedom to attack posters?

 

[FiveParadox]

Johnny Utah, I would suggest that while perhaps any "surge" in terrorism would not be quite as dramatic as pastafarian had implicated, I am sure that there are some citizens of countries which have been affected, such as the Republic of Iraq, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, that have perceived the situation in a negative context, and have perhaps turned to suggestions of terrorism.

As to whether or not such "new" terrorists would outnumber those terrorist subjects who have perhaps been "terminated" (through armed intervention, or through reform to more peaceful ideas) is quite in question, in my opinion.

:!: Revision : (Footnote) No, Jay, of course darkbeaver does not have that freedom. His post was inappropriate (in my opinion), as it attacked another user's character as opposed to his or her argument or ideas (I have no reservations assuring you that he has been reporters).

 

[darkbeaver]

Re: RE: Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crim

Why is Dark Beaver given freedom to attack posters?

What attack are you talking about Jay?

 

[pastafarian]

Glad to see you back around Pasta...I missed you, you know

Well, Jay, it's good to see you're still here keeping the board from being overrun by hordes of Godless lefties :wink:

 

[Jay]

Re: RE: Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crim

Why is Dark Beaver given freedom to attack posters?

What attack are you talking about Jay?

I realize there are many that you get away with, but I'm talking about the most recent one.

 

[Jay]

Glad to see you back around Pasta...I missed you, you know

Well, Jay, it's good to see you're still here keeping the board from being overrun by hordes of Godless lefties :wink:

It's a tough job but someone has to do it!

 

[Johnny Utah]

Re: RE: Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crim

Johnny Utah, I would suggest that while perhaps any "surge" in terrorism would not be quite as dramatic as pastafarian had implicated, I am sure that there are some citizens of countries which have been affected, such as the Republic of Iraq, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, that have perceived the situation in a negative context, and have perhaps turned to suggestions of terrorism.

As to whether or not such "new" terrorists would outnumber those terrorist subjects who have perhaps been "terminated" (through armed intervention, or through reform to more peaceful ideas) is quite in question, in my opinion.

Johnny Utah

If you are saying the Iraq War under President Bush is creating more America hating Terrorists (which by the way is total BS), then the 8 years of President of President Clinton created America hating Terrorists who committed 9/11, or will you try to somehow blame that on President Bush to?

This comment was sarcasm to counter the Left's thinking when President Bush went into Iraq it's creating more Terrorists who hate the United States. I don't believe that of President Bush or Clinton because the truth is Terrorists don't need a reason to hate the United States or any other Country they just do.