Sen. Graham Warns: 'Next 9/11' Is in the Making
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
I hope a nice swarthy middle eastern gentleman someday is inspired by your moronic mouth and drops you with a kick to your tiny nuts and then urinates on you while you snivel for your mommy. You are the poster boy for eugenic selection. You're stupid, it's not your fault, but it is a fault. You should confine yourself to the crayon pages and stay out of adult conversations until and if you mature, a lot.
al Qaeda's worse enemy:
--------------
Too bad he was stopped by these clowns:
I have a bronze statue of Saddam in my garden he urinates on the perverted Bush and Blair all day.
""Abdulaziz Alomari
Age: Unknown.
Nationality: Saudi.
The last hijacker to arrive in the United States. His grinning face captured at an ATM machine in Portland, Maine, gave rise to an FBI theory that some hijackers did not know the Sept. 11 plot was a suicide mission. Took flying classes in Vero Beach. Trained at a Boynton Beach gym."
Hey, guess what, fukknuts........................SURPRISE...........
:thefinger:
Saddam and Gonorrhea, right ?
Jesus and Allah and Moh(can't spell it) gonna shyte right on their heads.;
bad luck karma
Damn. Usta go with a nice gal from NYC.........sorry for her when the appokylips happens........Nah, she's pushin 66 now with a buncha kids and a man in prison.
Ah well, we all enter the rapids..............few do the required paddling.
fukk us , eh.
that's philosophy
Age: Unknown.
Nationality: Saudi.
The last hijacker to arrive in the United States. His grinning face captured at an ATM machine in Portland, Maine, gave rise to an FBI theory that some hijackers did not know the Sept. 11 plot was a suicide mission. Took flying classes in Vero Beach. Trained at a Boynton Beach gym."
Hey, guess what, fukknuts........................SURPRISE...........
:thefinger:
Saddam and Gonorrhea, right ?
Jesus and Allah and Moh(can't spell it) gonna shyte right on their heads.;
bad luck karma
Damn. Usta go with a nice gal from NYC.........sorry for her when the appokylips happens........Nah, she's pushin 66 now with a buncha kids and a man in prison.
Ah well, we all enter the rapids..............few do the required paddling.
fukk us , eh.
that's philosophy
LOL The rates are fighting and killing themselves in Iraq now..
Classic
Amazing some of the atrocities they are showing on the Internet.. this is violent sh*t Muslim against Muslim... why because they are not Muslim enough??? WTF!!
Graphic Video: ISIS Death Squads Killing Without Mercy on Iraqi Roads
After posting sickening beheading video of Iraqi policeman, ISIS boast of slaughtering 1,700 soldiers
ISIS butchers leave 'roads lined with decapitated police and soldiers
Iraq crisis: the bare faced ISIS executioner who spreads terror with his open killing
Crazy Muzzies, what's new..they whole region is bananas..
Religion of Peace... LOL
.
.
Last edited:
Quizling. good beer drinking people will rule, evrybody what;s somebody knows thqat.
LOL, there isn't much that McCain has been right about.Wait, McCain was wrong on Iraq?
Here’s a whole lot of Sen. John McCain being wrong on Iraq
Wait, McCain was wrong on Iraq? Yup. | MSNBC
In the spirit of James Poniewozik's superb new rule on Iraq, brought to us here by Barb Morrill, I present the following.
Today, David Brooks offered his opinion on Iraq, 2014. The guts are in the final paragraph, where he called for: "a more forward-leaning American posture around the world, an awareness that sometimes a U.S.-created vacuum can be ruinous. The president says his doctrine is don’t do stupid stuff. Sometimes withdrawal is the stupidest thing of all."
Hmmmmm. You know what. I don't think so. The stupidest thing of all is invading a country that hadn't attacked us, posed no real threat to us, had no weapons capable of reaching us, or any capability to produce such weapons for the foreseeable future.
To fulfill the Poniewozik Rule, let's see what Mr. Brooks was saying about the Iraq war before George W. Bush gave the order to invade:
The president has remained resolute. Momentum to liberate Iraq continues to build. The situation has clarified, and history will allow clear judgments about which leaders and which institutions were up to the challenge posed by Saddam and which were not.In other words, David Brooks was on board. Who wasn't, might we ask? Barack Obama. Remember what the current president said, at the same time Brooks was leading the charge in favor of invasion?
I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.So, when it comes to Iraq 2014, who do you want to listen to? The guy(s), like Brooks (or John McCain), who were dead wrong about Iraq 2003, or people like Barack Obama, who was 100 percent right. That's a rhetorical question, in case you're wondering.
The United States once had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but president Barack Obama let him go, it has emerged.
Al Baghdadi, who also goes by the name Abu Du'a, was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the US's now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.
But now, five years later, he is the head of a group of ruthless extremists who are bearing down on Baghdad, burning down everything in their way and carrying out executions on Iraqi civilians, soldiers and police officers.
It is unclear why the US let the merciless al-Qaeda leader slip away, however, one theory proposed by The Telegraph is that al Baghadadi was granted amnesty along with thousands of other detainees because the US was preparing to pull out of Iraq.
The United States began withdrawing troops from Iraq in 2010, and Camp Bucca closed in 2011 along with the United States' other military facilities as President Obama declared that the War in Iraq had come to an end.
Another possible explanation is that al Baghadadi did not become a jihadist until after his release from Camp Bucca.
The US now has a $10 million warrant out for Baghdadi, who is accused of bombing a mosque in Baghdad in 2011 and killing former Sunni lawmaker Khalid al-Fahdawl.
Al Baghadadi and his troops had already taken key cities of Fallujah and Ramadi in Iraq earlier this year and have conquered the Iraqi cities of Tikrit and Mosul within the last several days.
They are now on the war path to Iraq's capital city of Baghdad.
Read more: ISIS boast of slaughtering 1,700 soldiers after posting beheading video of Iraqi policeman | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
-----------------------------------
Obama let this nut bar go too... just like the 5 terrorists... who side is Obama on..???
The United States once had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but president Barack Obama let him go, it has emerged.
Al Baghdadi, who also goes by the name Abu Du'a, was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the US's now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.
But now, five years later, he is the head of a group of ruthless extremists who are bearing down on Baghdad, burning down everything in their way and carrying out executions on Iraqi civilians, soldiers and police officers.
It is unclear why the US let the merciless al-Qaeda leader slip away, however, one theory proposed by The Telegraph is that al Baghadadi was granted amnesty along with thousands of other detainees because the US was preparing to pull out of Iraq.
The United States began withdrawing troops from Iraq in 2010, and Camp Bucca closed in 2011 along with the United States' other military facilities as President Obama declared that the War in Iraq had come to an end.
Another possible explanation is that al Baghadadi did not become a jihadist until after his release from Camp Bucca.
The US now has a $10 million warrant out for Baghdadi, who is accused of bombing a mosque in Baghdad in 2011 and killing former Sunni lawmaker Khalid al-Fahdawl.
Al Baghadadi and his troops had already taken key cities of Fallujah and Ramadi in Iraq earlier this year and have conquered the Iraqi cities of Tikrit and Mosul within the last several days.
They are now on the war path to Iraq's capital city of Baghdad.
Read more: ISIS boast of slaughtering 1,700 soldiers after posting beheading video of Iraqi policeman | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
-----------------------------------
Obama let this nut bar go too... just like the 5 terrorists... who side is Obama on..???
The quintesential idiot.
American leftists live in NYC. American leftism is a status crime which makes one evil. When the fuzzy wuzzies rain hell fire down on the American leftists it won't be my problem. It's not my war.
corrected
really you shouldn't put yourself down in this manner...
The Almighty Mess in Iraq (Courtesy of Bush & Cheney)
by Eric Margolis
Saddam Hussein was certainly right when he predicted that America’s invasion of Iraq would become “the Mother of All Battles.” Eleven years later, it continues.
This week saw the collapse of two divisions of Iraq’s government army, a full 30,000 men running like chickens before the relentless advance of the fighters of ISIS – the Islamic State of Iraq and Shams (Syria). The same puppet army trained and equipped for a decade by the US at a cost of $14 billion. An evil portent of what awaits Afghanistan’s US-led army and police.
They are battling to overthrow the US-installed Shia regime in Baghdad of Nuri al-Maliki, an Iranian ally. There are suspicions ISIS may be secretly financed by Sunni Saudi Arabia, a US ally.
Wait a minute. My enemy’s enemy is my friend, as the old Mideast saying goes. The US is trying to overthrow Syria’s secular government to undermine its ally, Iran. The US has been using brutal jihadist groups against the Assad regime in Damascus. But now these jihadists in Syria have mostly fallen under the sway of ISIS – which is chewing up the US-backed regime in Baghdad. Confusing, is it not? My enemy’s enemy has become my friend’s enemy.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq, the stupidest war in US history, which was rousingly backed by Congress and the media, has produced a monumental mess of mind-numbing complexity as Washington trips over its own feet. The ladies advising President Barack Obama on his Mideast policy are hopelessly befuddled.
In fact, Israel emerged as the sole strategic victor of the Bush/Cheney war against Iraq. That war, so far, has cost the US 4,500 soldiers killed, 35,700 wounded, 45,000 sick and over $1 trillion. Iraq lies in ruins, likely shattered beyond all attempts to put it back together. No senior American or British official has faced trial for this disastrous, trumped-up war.
Nuri Maliki has totally excluded Sunnis from power in Iraq, and uses brutal secret police and torture to repress them. Small wonder he faces a major uprising. Iraq’s oil-based economy remains in ruins. Many Iraqis believe their now wretched nation was far better off under Saddam Hussein, as brutal and clumsy as he was.
Interestingly, efforts by ISIS to forge an Islamic state in a merged Syria and Iraq is one of the first major challenges to the foul Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916 under which the British and French Empires secretly colluded to divide up the moribund Ottoman Empire’s Mideast domains. Today’s artificial Mideast borders were drawn by the Anglo-French imperialists to impose their rule on the region. Iraq and Syria were the most egregious examples.
ISIS appears set on erasing the British-French borders and re-creating the unified Ottoman province (Turkish: vilyat) of Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. In the West, the neocon-dominated commentariat calls ISIS terrorists. In the Mideast, many see them as anti-colonial fighters struggling to reunite the Arab world sundered and splintered by the western powers.
more
The Almighty Mess in Iraq (Courtesy of Bush & Cheney) | Common Dreams
and
Unthinkable Thoughts in the Debate About ISIS in Iraq | Common Dreams
by Eric Margolis
Saddam Hussein was certainly right when he predicted that America’s invasion of Iraq would become “the Mother of All Battles.” Eleven years later, it continues.
This week saw the collapse of two divisions of Iraq’s government army, a full 30,000 men running like chickens before the relentless advance of the fighters of ISIS – the Islamic State of Iraq and Shams (Syria). The same puppet army trained and equipped for a decade by the US at a cost of $14 billion. An evil portent of what awaits Afghanistan’s US-led army and police.
They are battling to overthrow the US-installed Shia regime in Baghdad of Nuri al-Maliki, an Iranian ally. There are suspicions ISIS may be secretly financed by Sunni Saudi Arabia, a US ally.
Wait a minute. My enemy’s enemy is my friend, as the old Mideast saying goes. The US is trying to overthrow Syria’s secular government to undermine its ally, Iran. The US has been using brutal jihadist groups against the Assad regime in Damascus. But now these jihadists in Syria have mostly fallen under the sway of ISIS – which is chewing up the US-backed regime in Baghdad. Confusing, is it not? My enemy’s enemy has become my friend’s enemy.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq, the stupidest war in US history, which was rousingly backed by Congress and the media, has produced a monumental mess of mind-numbing complexity as Washington trips over its own feet. The ladies advising President Barack Obama on his Mideast policy are hopelessly befuddled.
In fact, Israel emerged as the sole strategic victor of the Bush/Cheney war against Iraq. That war, so far, has cost the US 4,500 soldiers killed, 35,700 wounded, 45,000 sick and over $1 trillion. Iraq lies in ruins, likely shattered beyond all attempts to put it back together. No senior American or British official has faced trial for this disastrous, trumped-up war.
Nuri Maliki has totally excluded Sunnis from power in Iraq, and uses brutal secret police and torture to repress them. Small wonder he faces a major uprising. Iraq’s oil-based economy remains in ruins. Many Iraqis believe their now wretched nation was far better off under Saddam Hussein, as brutal and clumsy as he was.
Interestingly, efforts by ISIS to forge an Islamic state in a merged Syria and Iraq is one of the first major challenges to the foul Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916 under which the British and French Empires secretly colluded to divide up the moribund Ottoman Empire’s Mideast domains. Today’s artificial Mideast borders were drawn by the Anglo-French imperialists to impose their rule on the region. Iraq and Syria were the most egregious examples.
ISIS appears set on erasing the British-French borders and re-creating the unified Ottoman province (Turkish: vilyat) of Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. In the West, the neocon-dominated commentariat calls ISIS terrorists. In the Mideast, many see them as anti-colonial fighters struggling to reunite the Arab world sundered and splintered by the western powers.
more
The Almighty Mess in Iraq (Courtesy of Bush & Cheney) | Common Dreams
and
Unthinkable Thoughts in the Debate About ISIS in Iraq | Common Dreams
Graham's wrong, they are going to attack England...........
The Prime Minister has cautioned that doing nothing in Iraq and Syria would leave Islamist militants free to launch attacks on Britain.
David Cameron told MPs that leaving Iraq to look after its own affairs was not an option and an "extreme Islamist regime" must not be allowed to be created in the middle of the country.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Mr Cameron said those who said the bloody insurgency in the country was "nothing to do with us" were wrong and that left unchecked, ISIS would turn its fire on the UK.
Mr Cameron said at Prime Minister's Questions: "I disagree with those people who think this is nothing to do with us and if they want to have some sort of extreme Islamist regime in the middle of Iraq, that won't affect us. It will.
PM Warns Iraq Terrorists Will 'Hit UK At Home'
The Prime Minister has cautioned that doing nothing in Iraq and Syria would leave Islamist militants free to launch attacks on Britain.
David Cameron told MPs that leaving Iraq to look after its own affairs was not an option and an "extreme Islamist regime" must not be allowed to be created in the middle of the country.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Mr Cameron said those who said the bloody insurgency in the country was "nothing to do with us" were wrong and that left unchecked, ISIS would turn its fire on the UK.
Mr Cameron said at Prime Minister's Questions: "I disagree with those people who think this is nothing to do with us and if they want to have some sort of extreme Islamist regime in the middle of Iraq, that won't affect us. It will.
PM Warns Iraq Terrorists Will 'Hit UK At Home'
Imacreyshun is so lax in the UK the whole ISIS army could slip in equiped with tanks and rocket launchers and hide in boarding houses waiting for the signal. Cameron is five rungs at least too far up the ladder.
